DivEMT: Neural Machine Translation Post-Editing Effort Across Typologically Diverse Languages
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We introduce DivEMT, the first publicly available post-editing study of Neural Machine Translation (NMT) over a typologically diverse set of target languages. Using a strictly controlled setup, 18 professional translators were instructed to translate or post-edit the same set of English documents into Arabic, Dutch, Italian, Turkish, Ukrainian, and Vietnamese. During the process, their edits, keystrokes, editing times and pauses were recorded, enabling an in-depth, cross-lingual evaluation of NMT quality and post-editing effectiveness. Using this new dataset, we assess the impact of two state-of-the-art NMT systems, Google Translate and the multilingual mBART-50 model, on translation productivity. We find that post-editing is consistently faster than translation from scratch. However, the magnitude of productivity gains varies widely across systems and languages, highlighting major disparities in post-editing effectiveness for languages at different degrees of typological relatedness to English, even when controlling for system architecture and training data size. We publicly release the complete dataset including all collected behavioral data, to foster new research on the translation capabilities of NMT systems for typologically diverse languages.
Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 57 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 May 2022.
Builds on
23 of 57 references.
References · 23
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
- 2015Neural Machine Translation of Rare Words with Subword Unitscited by 2,918
- 2018A Call for Clarity in Reporting BLEU Scorescited by 1,799
- 2020Multilingual Denoising Pre-training for Neural Machine Translationcited by 1,035
- 2020COMET: A Neural Framework for MT Evaluationcited by 1,033
- 2020Beyond English-Centric Multilingual Machine Translationcited by 561
- 2021The FLORES-101 Evaluation Benchmark for Low-Resource and Multilingual Machine Translationcited by 560
- 2021Experts, Errors, and Context: A Large-Scale Study of Human Evaluation for Machine Translationcited by 338
- 2017What do Neural Machine Translation Models Learn about Morphology?cited by 166
- 2019Choosing Transfer Languages for Cross-Lingual Learningcited by 144
- 2018Are All Languages Equally Hard to Language-Model?cited by 53
- 2019What Kind of Language Is Hard to Language-Model?cited by 50
11 more
- 2020MLQE-PE: A Multilingual Quality Estimation and Post-Editing Datasetcited by 47
- 2021Continual Mixed-Language Pre-Training for Extremely Low-Resource Neural Machine Translationcited by 29
- 2020It's Easier to Translate out of English than into it: Measuring Neural Translation Difficulty by Cross-Mutual Informationcited by 26
- 2016Neural versus Phrase-Based Machine Translation Quality: a Case Studycited by 19
- 2022Consistent Human Evaluation of Machine Translation across Language Pairscited by 13
- 2021Neural Machine Translation Quality and Post-Editing Performancecited by 12
- 2021On the Difficulty of Translating Free-Order Case-Marking Languagescited by 8
- 2022What do complexity measures measure? Correlating and validating corpus-based measures of morphological complexitycited by 8
- 2019Post-editing Productivity with Neural Machine Translation: An Empirical Assessment of Speed and Quality in the Banking and Finance Domaincited by 7
- 2021How Suitable Are Subword Segmentation Strategies for Translating Non-Concatenative Morphology?cited by 7
- 2021Assessing Post-editing Effort in the English-Hindi Directioncited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 4; 2025: 5; 2026: 2.
11 papers.
- 2024What the Harm? Quantifying the Tangible Impact of Gender Bias in Machine Translation with a Human-centered Studycited by 15
- 2025QE4PE: Word-level Quality Estimation for Human Post-Editingcited by 6
- 2025Unsupervised Word-level Quality Estimation for Machine Translation Through the Lens of Annotators (Dis)agreementcited by 4
- 2025A survey of diversity quantification in natural language processing: The why, what, where and howcited by 4
- 2025Specification-Aware Machine Translation and Evaluation for Purpose Alignmentcited by 4
- 2024What is "Typological Diversity" in NLP?cited by 3
- 2025CAPO: Confidence Aware Preference Optimization Learning for Multilingual Preferencescited by 3
- 2024SADAS: A Dialogue Assistant System Towards Remediating Norm Violations in Bilingual Socio-Cultural Conversationscited by 2
- 2026Assessing the Impact of Typological Features on Multilingual Machine Translation in the Age of Large Language Modelscited by 1
- 2026Speaking in Self-Assessing Tongues: On the Verbalized Confidence of LLMs in Machine Translationcited by 1
- 2024Revealing Trends in Datasets from the 2022 ACL and EMNLP Conferencescited by 0
- 2026Speaking in Self-Assessing Tongues: On the Verbalized Confidence of LLMs in Machine Translation15 Jun 2026
- 2026Assessing the Impact of Typological Features on Multilingual Machine Translation in the Age of Large Language Models3 Feb 2026
- 2025CAPO: Confidence Aware Preference Optimization Learning for Multilingual Preferences10 Nov 2025
- 2025Specification-Aware Machine Translation and Evaluation for Purpose Alignment22 Sep 2025
- 2025A survey of diversity quantification in natural language processing: The why, what, where and how28 Jul 2025
- 2025Unsupervised Word-level Quality Estimation for Machine Translation Through the Lens of Annotators (Dis)agreement29 May 2025
- 2025QE4PE: Word-level Quality Estimation for Human Post-Editing4 Mar 2025
- 2024What the Harm? Quantifying the Tangible Impact of Gender Bias in Machine Translation with a Human-centered Study1 Oct 2024
- 2024Revealing Trends in Datasets from the 2022 ACL and EMNLP Conferences31 Mar 2024
- 2024What is "Typological Diversity" in NLP?6 Feb 2024
- 2024SADAS: A Dialogue Assistant System Towards Remediating Norm Violations in Bilingual Socio-Cultural Conversations29 Jan 2024