mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

On the Difficulty of Translating Free-Order Case-Marking Languages

arXiv 2107.06055 ↗First posted 13 Jul 2021cs.CLcited by 8

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Identifying factors that make certain languages harder to model than others is essential to reach language equality in future Natural Language Processing technologies. Free-order case-marking languages, such as Russian, Latin or Tamil, have proved more challenging than fixed-order languages for the tasks of syntactic parsing and subject-verb agreement prediction. In this work, we investigate whether this class of languages is also more difficult to translate by state-of-the-art Neural Machine Translation models (NMT). Using a variety of synthetic languages and a newly introduced translation challenge set, we find that word order flexibility in the source language only leads to a very small loss of NMT quality, even though the core verb arguments become impossible to disambiguate in sentences without semantic cues. The latter issue is indeed solved by the addition of case marking. However, in medium- and low-resource settings, the overall NMT quality of fixed-order languages remains unmatched.

Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 63 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Jul 2021.

Builds on

24 of 63 references.

References · 24

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2014Neural Machine Translation by Jointly Learning to Align and Translatecited by 4,530
  3. 2015Neural Machine Translation of Rare Words with Subword Unitscited by 2,898
  4. 2020Multilingual Denoising Pre-training for Neural Machine Translationcited by 1,028
  5. 2015Effective Approaches to Attention-based Neural Machine Translationcited by 1,024
  6. 2020The State and Fate of Linguistic Diversity and Inclusion in the NLP Worldcited by 789
  7. 2020Stanza: A Python Natural Language Processing Toolkit for Many Human Languagescited by 719
  8. 2019Theoretical Limitations of Self-Attention in Neural Sequence Modelscited by 286
  9. 2018Colorless green recurrent networks dream hierarchicallycited by 210
  10. 2017What do Neural Machine Translation Models Learn about Morphology?cited by 165
  11. 2018Achieving Human Parity on Automatic Chinese to English News Translationcited by 119
  12. 2019Jointly Learning to Align and Translate with Transformer Modelscited by 75
12 more
  1. 2019The FLoRes Evaluation Datasets for Low-Resource Machine Translation: Nepali-English and Sinhala-Englishcited by 61
  2. 2018Are All Languages Equally Hard to Language-Model?cited by 53
  3. 2019What Kind of Language Is Hard to Language-Model?cited by 50
  4. 2018The Importance of Being Recurrent for Modeling Hierarchical Structurecited by 42
  5. 2018Contextual Parameter Generation for Universal Neural Machine Translationcited by 40
  6. 2019Studying the Inductive Biases of RNNs with Synthetic Variations of Natural Languagescited by 37
  7. 2016Tree-to-Sequence Attentional Neural Machine Translationcited by 28
  8. 2020It's Easier to Translate out of English than into it: Measuring Neural Translation Difficulty by Cross-Mutual Informationcited by 26
  9. 2017The Galactic Dependencies Treebanks: Getting More Data by Synthesizing New Languagescited by 19
  10. 2019Word-order biases in deep-agent emergent communicationcited by 18
  11. 2020Predicting Declension Class from Form and Meaningcited by 5
  12. 2018Inducing Grammars with and for Neural Machine Translationcited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 1; 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 3.

8 papers.