mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

What do complexity measures measure? Correlating and validating corpus-based measures of morphological complexity

arXiv 2204.05056 ↗First posted 11 Apr 2022cs.CLcited by 8

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We present an analysis of eight measures used for quantifying morphological complexity of natural languages. The measures we study are corpus-based measures of morphological complexity with varying requirements for corpus annotation. We present similarities and differences between these measures visually and through correlation analyses, as well as their relation to the relevant typological variables. Our analysis focuses on whether these `measures' are measures of the same underlying variable, or whether they measure more than one dimension of morphological complexity. The principal component analysis indicates that the first principal component explains 92.62 % of the variation in eight measures, indicating a strong linear dependence between the complexity measures studied.

Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 4 of its 61 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Apr 2022.

Builds on

4 of 61 references.

References · 4

  1. 2019The SIGMORPHON 2019 Shared Task: Morphological Analysis in Context and Cross-Lingual Transfer for Inflectioncited by 43
  2. 2018The CoNLL--SIGMORPHON 2018 Shared Task: Universal Morphological Reinflectioncited by 41
  3. 2018On the Complexity and Typology of Inflectional Morphological Systemscited by 15
  4. 2016The statistical trade-off between word order and word structure - large-scale evidence for the principle of least effortcited by 8

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 0; 2024: 2; 2025: 3; 2026: 2.

8 papers.