mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

BinaryPPO: Efficient Policy Optimization for Binary Classification

arXiv 2602.02708 ↗First posted 2 Feb 2026cs.LG cs.AI cs.CLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Supervised fine-tuning (SFT) is the standard approach for binary classification tasks such as toxicity detection, factuality verification, and causal inference. However, SFT often performs poorly in real-world settings with label noise, class imbalance, or sparse supervision. We introduce BinaryPPO, an offline reinforcement learning large language model (LLM) framework that reformulates binary classification as a reward maximization problem. Our method leverages a variant of Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO) with a confidence-weighted reward function that penalizes uncertain or incorrect predictions, enabling the model to learn robust decision policies from static datasets without online interaction. Across eight domain-specific benchmarks and multiple models with differing architectures, BinaryPPO improves accuracy by 40-60 percentage points, reaching up to 99%, substantially outperforming supervised baselines. We provide an in-depth analysis of the role of reward shaping, advantage scaling, and policy stability in enabling this improvement. Overall, we demonstrate that confidence-based reward design provides a robust alternative to SFT for binary classification. Our code is available at https://github.com/psyonp/BinaryPPO.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Feb 2026.

Builds on

22 of 42 references.

References · 22

  1. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 7,916
  2. 2019BoolQ: Exploring the Surprising Difficulty of Natural Yes/No Questionscited by 2,140
  3. 2018FEVER: a large-scale dataset for Fact Extraction and VERificationcited by 1,362
  4. 2023An Empirical Study of Catastrophic Forgetting in Large Language Models During Continual Fine-tuningcited by 622
  5. 2023"Do Anything Now": Characterizing and Evaluating In-The-Wild Jailbreak Prompts on Large Language Modelscited by 457
  6. 2018Gender Bias in Coreference Resolutioncited by 438
  7. 2022ToxiGen: A Large-Scale Machine-Generated Dataset for Adversarial and Implicit Hate Speech Detectioncited by 419
  8. 2023Toxicity in ChatGPT: Analyzing Persona-assigned Language Modelscited by 356
  9. 2024A StrongREJECT for Empty Jailbreakscited by 352
  10. 2022A Holistic Approach to Undesired Content Detection in the Real Worldcited by 337
  11. 2018Adversarially Robust Generalization Requires More Datacited by 318
  12. 2025Reinforcement Learning for Reasoning in Large Language Models with One Training Examplecited by 288
10 more
  1. 2025Constitutional Classifiers: Defending against Universal Jailbreaks across Thousands of Hours of Red Teamingcited by 172
  2. 2023Understanding Catastrophic Forgetting in Language Models via Implicit Inferencecited by 138
  3. 2025On the Generalization of SFT: A Reinforcement Learning Perspective with Reward Rectificationcited by 121
  4. 2025Beyond Binary Rewards: Training LMs to Reason About Their Uncertaintycited by 107
  5. 2024Binary Classifier Optimization for Large Language Model Alignmentcited by 44
  6. 2021Causal Reinforcement Learning using Observational and Interventional Datacited by 38
  7. 2019Towards Robust Toxic Content Classificationcited by 22
  8. 2025BadJudge: Backdoor Vulnerabilities of LLM-as-a-Judgecited by 13
  9. 2025LLM Microscope: What Model Internals Reveal About Answer Correctness and Context Utilizationcited by 11
  10. 2024Adversarial Robustness Guarantees for Quantum Classifierscited by 6

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025BNPO: Beta Normalization Policy Optimization
  2. 2025Supervised Fine Tuning on Curated Data is Reinforcement Learning (and can be improved)
  3. 2026Start Classifying: Categorical Critics for LLM Reinforcement Learning
  4. 2026DDO-RM: Distribution-Level Policy Improvement after Reward Learning
  5. 2026Binary Rewards and Reinforcement Learning: Fundamental Challenges
  6. 2025Self-Rewarding PPO: Aligning Large Language Models with Demonstrations Only
  7. 2026Bridging SFT and RL: Dynamic Policy Optimization for Robust Reasoning
  8. 2024Binary Reward Labeling: Bridging Offline Preference and Reward-Based Reinforcement Learning