mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Self-Rewarding PPO: Aligning Large Language Models with Demonstrations Only

arXiv 2510.21090 ↗First posted 24 Oct 2025cs.CL cs.AI cs.LGcited by 1

On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → LLM preference optimization methods

also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)

Supervised fine-tuning (SFT) has emerged as a crucial method for aligning large language models (LLMs) with human-annotated demonstrations. However, SFT, being an off-policy approach similar to behavior cloning, often struggles with overfitting and poor out-of-domain generalization, especially in limited-data scenarios. To address these limitations, we propose Self-Rewarding PPO, a novel fine-tuning method that leverages on-policy techniques to enhance generalization performance. Our approach combines the strengths of SFT and proximal policy optimization (PPO) to achieve more effective alignment from demonstration data. At its core is a reward function designed as the log policy ratio between the SFT model and the pretrained base model. This function serves as an implicit reward signal, using the pretrained policy as a baseline and the SFT policy as a target. By doing so, it enables on-policy fine-tuning without relying on human preference annotations. The integration of this self-rewarding mechanism with PPO addresses key limitations of SFT, improving generalization, data efficiency, and robustness. Our empirical evaluation across a range of natural language processing tasks demonstrates that Self-Rewarding PPO consistently outperforms traditional SFT methods. The results highlight the effectiveness of our approach in aligning LLMs using demonstration data, particularly in scenarios where high-quality annotated data is scarce.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in LLM preference optimization methods, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 53 of its 69 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Oct 2025.

Builds on

53 of 69 references.

Closest ancestors · 8

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024WPO: Enhancing RLHF with Weighted Preference Optimization17 Jun
  2. 2024Unpacking DPO and PPO: Disentangling Best Practices for Learning from Preference Feedback13 Jun
  3. 2024Understanding the performance gap between online and offline alignment algorithms14 May
  4. 2024Is DPO Superior to PPO for LLM Alignment? A Comprehensive Study16 Apr
  5. 2024Direct Language Model Alignment from Online AI Feedback7 Feb
  6. 2023Camels in a Changing Climate: Enhancing LM Adaptation with Tulu 217 Nov
  7. 2023LIMA: Less Is More for Alignment18 May
  8. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback4 Mar

Other references · 45

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  2. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
  3. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
  4. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,192
  5. 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 12,865
  6. 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,302
  7. 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 9,743
  8. 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 8,851
  9. 2021Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Codecited by 8,053
  10. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 7,916
  11. 2025DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learningcited by 6,146
  12. 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferencescited by 3,846
33 more
  1. 2021Finetuned Language Models Are Zero-Shot Learnerscited by 3,747
  2. 2022Training a Helpful and Harmless Assistant with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 3,634
  3. 2023Mistral 7Bcited by 3,065
  4. 2022Scaling Instruction-Finetuned Language Modelscited by 2,997
  5. 2022Constitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI Feedbackcited by 2,950
  6. 2023GPQA: A Graduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A Benchmarkcited by 2,748
  7. 2020Learning to summarize from human feedbackcited by 2,562
  8. 2019HuggingFace's Transformers: State-of-the-art Natural Language Processingcited by 2,201
  9. 2019Fine-Tuning Language Models from Human Preferencescited by 2,124
  10. 2016Generative Adversarial Imitation Learningcited by 1,576
  11. 2022LaMDA: Language Models for Dialog Applicationscited by 1,218
  12. 2023PaLM 2 Technical Reportcited by 1,154
  13. 2023Instruction-Following Evaluation for Large Language Modelscited by 1,143
  14. 2022Scaling Laws for Reward Model Overoptimizationcited by 1,056
  15. 2024Length-Controlled AlpacaEval: A Simple Way to Debias Automatic Evaluatorscited by 865
  16. 2022Red Teaming Language Models to Reduce Harms: Methods, Scaling Behaviors, and Lessons Learnedcited by 702
  17. 2024Self-Play Fine-Tuning Converts Weak Language Models to Strong Language Modelscited by 552
  18. 2018Behavioral Cloning from Observationcited by 482
  19. 2018An Algorithmic Perspective on Imitation Learningcited by 455
  20. 2021Implicit Behavioral Cloningcited by 442
  21. 2023UltraFeedback: Boosting Language Models with Scaled AI Feedbackcited by 394
  22. 2024RLHF Workflow: From Reward Modeling to Online RLHFcited by 265
  23. 2024When Scaling Meets LLM Finetuning: The Effect of Data, Model and Finetuning Methodcited by 201
  24. 2019A Divergence Minimization Perspective on Imitation Learning Methodscited by 188
  25. 2022Defining and Characterizing Reward Hackingcited by 184
  26. 2023ReMax: A Simple, Effective, and Efficient Reinforcement Learning Method for Aligning Large Language Modelscited by 184
  27. 2024Preference Fine-Tuning of LLMs Should Leverage Suboptimal, On-Policy Datacited by 184
  28. 2024Dense Reward for Free in Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 77
  29. 2024Getting More Juice Out of the SFT Data: Reward Learning from Human Demonstration Improves SFT for LLM Alignmentcited by 32
  30. 2024Inverse-RLignment: Large Language Model Alignment from Demonstrations through Inverse Reinforcement Learningcited by 27
  31. 2023Coherent Soft Imitation Learningcited by 21
  32. 2024Imitating Language via Scalable Inverse Reinforcement Learningcited by 21
  33. 2024Unveiling Imitation Learning: Exploring the Impact of Data Falsity to Large Language Modelcited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024Aligning Large Language Models by On-Policy Self-Judgment
  2. 2024Aligning Large Language Models via Fine-grained Supervision
  3. 2024Direct Alignment of Language Models via Quality-Aware Self-Refinement
  4. 2023Beyond Imitation: Leveraging Fine-grained Quality Signals for Alignment
  5. 2026The Flip Side of RLHF: On-Policy Feedback for Reward Model Self-Supervised Improvement
  6. 2024Dynamic Rewarding with Prompt Optimization Enables Tuning-free Self-Alignment of Language Models
  7. 2025A Self-Supervised Reinforcement Learning Approach for Fine-Tuning Large Language Models Using Cross-Attention Signals
  8. 2025Self-Consistency of the Internal Reward Models Improves Self-Rewarding Language Models