Self-Rewarding PPO: Aligning Large Language Models with Demonstrations Only
On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → LLM preference optimization methods
also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)
Supervised fine-tuning (SFT) has emerged as a crucial method for aligning large language models (LLMs) with human-annotated demonstrations. However, SFT, being an off-policy approach similar to behavior cloning, often struggles with overfitting and poor out-of-domain generalization, especially in limited-data scenarios. To address these limitations, we propose Self-Rewarding PPO, a novel fine-tuning method that leverages on-policy techniques to enhance generalization performance. Our approach combines the strengths of SFT and proximal policy optimization (PPO) to achieve more effective alignment from demonstration data. At its core is a reward function designed as the log policy ratio between the SFT model and the pretrained base model. This function serves as an implicit reward signal, using the pretrained policy as a baseline and the SFT policy as a target. By doing so, it enables on-policy fine-tuning without relying on human preference annotations. The integration of this self-rewarding mechanism with PPO addresses key limitations of SFT, improving generalization, data efficiency, and robustness. Our empirical evaluation across a range of natural language processing tasks demonstrates that Self-Rewarding PPO consistently outperforms traditional SFT methods. The results highlight the effectiveness of our approach in aligning LLMs using demonstration data, particularly in scenarios where high-quality annotated data is scarce.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in LLM preference optimization methods, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 53 of its 69 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Oct 2025.
Builds on
53 of 69 references.
Closest ancestors · 8
Same direction, newest first
- 2024WPO: Enhancing RLHF with Weighted Preference Optimization17 Jun
- 2024Unpacking DPO and PPO: Disentangling Best Practices for Learning from Preference Feedback13 Jun
- 2024Understanding the performance gap between online and offline alignment algorithms14 May
- 2024Is DPO Superior to PPO for LLM Alignment? A Comprehensive Study16 Apr
- 2024Direct Language Model Alignment from Online AI Feedback7 Feb
- 2023Camels in a Changing Climate: Enhancing LM Adaptation with Tulu 217 Nov
- 2023LIMA: Less Is More for Alignment18 May
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback4 Mar
Other references · 45
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
- 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
- 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,192
- 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 12,865
- 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,302
- 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 9,743
- 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 8,851
- 2021Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Codecited by 8,053
- 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 7,916
- 2025DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learningcited by 6,146
- 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferencescited by 3,846
33 more
- 2021Finetuned Language Models Are Zero-Shot Learnerscited by 3,747
- 2022Training a Helpful and Harmless Assistant with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 3,634
- 2023Mistral 7Bcited by 3,065
- 2022Scaling Instruction-Finetuned Language Modelscited by 2,997
- 2022Constitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI Feedbackcited by 2,950
- 2023GPQA: A Graduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A Benchmarkcited by 2,748
- 2020Learning to summarize from human feedbackcited by 2,562
- 2019HuggingFace's Transformers: State-of-the-art Natural Language Processingcited by 2,201
- 2019Fine-Tuning Language Models from Human Preferencescited by 2,124
- 2016Generative Adversarial Imitation Learningcited by 1,576
- 2022LaMDA: Language Models for Dialog Applicationscited by 1,218
- 2023PaLM 2 Technical Reportcited by 1,154
- 2023Instruction-Following Evaluation for Large Language Modelscited by 1,143
- 2022Scaling Laws for Reward Model Overoptimizationcited by 1,056
- 2024Length-Controlled AlpacaEval: A Simple Way to Debias Automatic Evaluatorscited by 865
- 2022Red Teaming Language Models to Reduce Harms: Methods, Scaling Behaviors, and Lessons Learnedcited by 702
- 2024Self-Play Fine-Tuning Converts Weak Language Models to Strong Language Modelscited by 552
- 2018Behavioral Cloning from Observationcited by 482
- 2018An Algorithmic Perspective on Imitation Learningcited by 455
- 2021Implicit Behavioral Cloningcited by 442
- 2023UltraFeedback: Boosting Language Models with Scaled AI Feedbackcited by 394
- 2024RLHF Workflow: From Reward Modeling to Online RLHFcited by 265
- 2024When Scaling Meets LLM Finetuning: The Effect of Data, Model and Finetuning Methodcited by 201
- 2019A Divergence Minimization Perspective on Imitation Learning Methodscited by 188
- 2022Defining and Characterizing Reward Hackingcited by 184
- 2023ReMax: A Simple, Effective, and Efficient Reinforcement Learning Method for Aligning Large Language Modelscited by 184
- 2024Preference Fine-Tuning of LLMs Should Leverage Suboptimal, On-Policy Datacited by 184
- 2024Dense Reward for Free in Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 77
- 2024Getting More Juice Out of the SFT Data: Reward Learning from Human Demonstration Improves SFT for LLM Alignmentcited by 32
- 2024Inverse-RLignment: Large Language Model Alignment from Demonstrations through Inverse Reinforcement Learningcited by 27
- 2023Coherent Soft Imitation Learningcited by 21
- 2024Imitating Language via Scalable Inverse Reinforcement Learningcited by 21
- 2024Unveiling Imitation Learning: Exploring the Impact of Data Falsity to Large Language Modelcited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2024Aligning Large Language Models by On-Policy Self-Judgment
- 2024Aligning Large Language Models via Fine-grained Supervision
- 2024Direct Alignment of Language Models via Quality-Aware Self-Refinement
- 2023Beyond Imitation: Leveraging Fine-grained Quality Signals for Alignment
- 2026The Flip Side of RLHF: On-Policy Feedback for Reward Model Self-Supervised Improvement
- 2024Dynamic Rewarding with Prompt Optimization Enables Tuning-free Self-Alignment of Language Models
- 2025A Self-Supervised Reinforcement Learning Approach for Fine-Tuning Large Language Models Using Cross-Attention Signals
- 2025Self-Consistency of the Internal Reward Models Improves Self-Rewarding Language Models