Adversarial Robustness Guarantees for Quantum Classifiers
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Despite their ever more widespread deployment throughout society, machine learning algorithms remain critically vulnerable to being spoofed by subtle adversarial tampering with their input data. The prospect of near-term quantum computers being capable of running {quantum machine learning} (QML) algorithms has therefore generated intense interest in their adversarial vulnerability. Here we show that quantum properties of QML algorithms can confer fundamental protections against such attacks, in certain scenarios guaranteeing robustness against classically-armed adversaries. We leverage tools from many-body physics to identify the quantum sources of this protection. Our results offer a theoretical underpinning of recent evidence which suggest quantum advantages in the search for adversarial robustness. In particular, we prove that quantum classifiers are: (i) protected against weak perturbations of data drawn from the trained distribution, (ii) protected against local attacks if they are insufficiently scrambling, and (iii) show evidence that they are protected against universal adversarial attacks if they are sufficiently chaotic. Our analytic results are supported by numerical evidence demonstrating the applicability of our theorems and the resulting robustness of a quantum classifier in practice. This line of inquiry constitutes a concrete pathway to advantage in QML, orthogonal to the usually sought improvements in model speed or accuracy.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 32 of its 101 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 May 2024.
Builds on
32 of 101 references.
References · 32
- 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
- 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,114
- 2018Obfuscated Gradients Give a False Sense of Security: Circumventing Defenses to Adversarial Examplescited by 1,259
- 2019Adversarial Examples Are Not Bugs, They Are Featurescited by 950
- 2016Universal adversarial perturbationscited by 774
- 2017Evasion Attacks against Machine Learning at Test Timecited by 686
- 2018Barren plateaus in quantum neural network training landscapescited by 624
- 2017One pixel attack for fooling deep neural networkscited by 579
- 2018Certified Robustness to Adversarial Examples with Differential Privacycited by 462
- 2020The power of quantum neural networkscited by 377
- 2016Quantum Machine Learningcited by 325
- 2020A rigorous and robust quantum speed-up in supervised machine learningcited by 270
20 more
- 2020Noise-Induced Barren Plateaus in Variational Quantum Algorithmscited by 192
- 2021Connecting ansatz expressibility to gradient magnitudes and barren plateauscited by 180
- 2024Barren Plateaus in Variational Quantum Computingcited by 130
- 2020Absence of Barren Plateaus in Quantum Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 124
- 2020Entanglement Induced Barren Plateauscited by 101
- 2017Universal Adversarial Perturbations Against Semantic Image Segmentationcited by 92
- 2020Robust data encodings for quantum classifierscited by 91
- 2023Does provable absence of barren plateaus imply classical simulability?cited by 78
- 2020Quantum noise protects quantum classifiers against adversariescited by 68
- 2019Quantum Adversarial Machine Learningcited by 64
- 2022Theoretical Guarantees for Permutation-Equivariant Quantum Neural Networkscited by 52
- 2022Experimental quantum adversarial learning with programmable superconducting qubitscited by 38
- 2022Benchmarking Adversarially Robust Quantum Machine Learning at Scalecited by 28
- 2023Towards quantum enhanced adversarial robustness in machine learningcited by 26
- 2023Training robust and generalizable quantum modelscited by 21
- 2022Enhancing Quantum Adversarial Robustness by Randomized Encodingscited by 16
- 2023Quantum neural networks form Gaussian processescited by 11
- 2019Information Scrambling in Quantum Neural Networkscited by 7
- 2020Defence against adversarial attacks using classical and quantum-enhanced Boltzmann machinescited by 5
- 2024Constructing Optimal Noise Channels for Enhanced Robustness in Quantum Machine Learningcited by 5
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 4; 2026: 1.
6 papers.
- 2024Quantum Kernel Learning for Small Dataset Modeling in Semiconductor Fabrication: Application to Ohmic Contactcited by 2
- 2025Adversarial Robustness of Partitioned Quantum Classifierscited by 2
- 2025Adversarial Robustness in Distributed Quantum Machine Learningcited by 2
- 2025On the Generalization of Adversarially Trained Quantum Classifierscited by 1
- 2025Detecting underdetermination in parameterized quantum circuitscited by 0
- 2026BinaryPPO: Efficient Policy Optimization for Binary Classificationcited by 0
- 2026BinaryPPO: Efficient Policy Optimization for Binary Classification2 Feb 2026
- 2025Adversarial Robustness in Distributed Quantum Machine Learning16 Aug 2025
- 2025On the Generalization of Adversarially Trained Quantum Classifiers24 Apr 2025
- 2025Detecting underdetermination in parameterized quantum circuits4 Apr 2025
- 2025Adversarial Robustness of Partitioned Quantum Classifiers28 Jan 2025
- 2024Quantum Kernel Learning for Small Dataset Modeling in Semiconductor Fabrication: Application to Ohmic Contact17 Sep 2024