DDO-RM: Distribution-Level Policy Improvement after Reward Learning
On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → Reward modeling and RLHF
Abstract (arXiv)
Recent theory suggests that reward-model-first methods can be more sample-efficient than direct policy fitting when the reward function is statistically simpler than the induced policy. We propose DDO-RM, a finite-candidate decision-optimization method that converts reward scores into an explicit target distribution. Unlike PPO-based RLHF or DPO, DDO-RM performs a KL-regularized mirror-descent update to project the policy toward a reward-improved distribution over a candidate set. Preliminary experiments on Pythia-410M show that DDO-RM outperforms DPO in pair accuracy (0.52 to 0.56) and mean margin (0.13 to 0.53). Our framework provides a principled connection between reward learning and mirror-descent policy improvement.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Reward modeling and RLHF, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 8 of its 18 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Apr 2026.
Builds on
8 of 18 references.
Closest ancestors · 2
Same direction, newest first
- 2025Understanding the Performance Gap in Preference Learning: A Dichotomy of RLHF and DPO26 May
- 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Model29 May
Other references · 6
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
- 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 15,215
- 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 9,379
- 2023Pythia: A Suite for Analyzing Large Language Models Across Training and Scalingcited by 1,786
- 2024SimPO: Simple Preference Optimization with a Reference-Free Rewardcited by 963
- 2024ORPO: Monolithic Preference Optimization without Reference Modelcited by 562
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2024Reward Model Learning vs. Direct Policy Optimization: A Comparative Analysis of Learning from Human Preferences
- 2024Policy Filtration for RLHF to Mitigate Noise in Reward Models
- 2026Fine-Tuning on Self-Generated and Reward-Weighted Data: Learning Dynamics, Convergence Rates, and Benefits of Off-Policyness
- 2025Value-Free Policy Optimization via Reward Partitioning
- 2026GOPO: Policy Optimization using Ranked Rewards
- 2023Policy Optimization in RLHF: The Impact of Out-of-preference Data
- 2025Reward Models in Deep Reinforcement Learning: A Survey
- 2024Zeroth-Order Policy Gradient for Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback without Reward Inference