Designing Time Series Experiments in A/B Testing with Transformer Reinforcement Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
A/B testing has become a gold standard for modern technological companies to conduct policy evaluation. Yet, its application to time series experiments, where policies are sequentially assigned over time, remains challenging. Existing designs suffer from two limitations: (i) they do not fully leverage the entire history for treatment allocation; (ii) they rely on strong assumptions to approximate the objective function (e.g., the mean squared error of the estimated treatment effect) for optimizing the design. We first establish an impossibility theorem showing that failure to condition on the full history leads to suboptimal designs, due to the dynamic dependencies in time series experiments. To address both limitations simultaneously, we next propose a transformer reinforcement learning (RL) approach which leverages transformers to condition allocation on the entire history and employs RL to directly optimize the MSE without relying on restrictive assumptions. Empirical evaluations on synthetic data, a publicly available dispatch simulator, and a real-world ridesharing dataset demonstrate that our proposal consistently outperforms existing designs.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 93 of its 153 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Feb 2026.
Builds on
93 of 153 references.
References · 93
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2015Deep Reinforcement Learning with Double Q-learningcited by 1,704
- 2022Are Transformers Effective for Time Series Forecasting?cited by 1,400
- 2018Attention, Learn to Solve Routing Problems!cited by 646
- 2016Neural Combinatorial Optimization with Reinforcement Learningcited by 600
- 2015Doubly Robust Off-policy Value Evaluation for Reinforcement Learningcited by 337
- 2019Batch Policy Learning under Constraintscited by 242
- 2020Reinforcement Learning for Combinatorial Optimization: A Surveycited by 235
- 2018Breaking the Curse of Horizon: Infinite-Horizon Off-Policy Estimationcited by 226
- 2019Causal Discovery with Reinforcement Learningcited by 145
- 2019Towards Optimal Off-Policy Evaluation for Reinforcement Learning with Marginalized Importance Samplingcited by 118
- 2019Double Reinforcement Learning for Efficient Off-Policy Evaluation in Markov Decision Processescited by 118
38 more
- 2021Deep Adaptive Design: Amortizing Sequential Bayesian Experimental Designcited by 103
- 2022A Review of Off-Policy Evaluation in Reinforcement Learningcited by 92
- 2017Device Placement Optimization with Reinforcement Learningcited by 84
- 2019Efficiently Breaking the Curse of Horizon in Off-Policy Evaluation with Double Reinforcement Learningcited by 75
- 2020Batch Policy Learning in Average Reward Markov Decision Processescited by 69
- 2020Statistical Inference of the Value Function for Reinforcement Learning in Infinite Horizon Settingscited by 65
- 2018FIRST: A Framework for Optimizing Information Quality in Mobile Crowdsensing Systemscited by 50
- 2021A Deep Value-network Based Approach for Multi-Driver Order Dispatchingcited by 45
- 2022Optimizing Sequential Experimental Design with Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 45
- 2013Graph cluster randomization: network exposure to multiple universescited by 42
- 2021Bootstrapping Fitted Q-Evaluation for Off-Policy Inferencecited by 40
- 2020Experimental Design in Two-Sided Platforms: An Analysis of Biascited by 39
- 2020Design and Analysis of Switchback Experimentscited by 37
- 2022Anytime-valid off-policy inference for contextual banditscited by 37
- 2021Deeply-Debiased Off-Policy Interval Estimationcited by 36
- 2022On Well-posedness and Minimax Optimal Rates of Nonparametric Q-function Estimation in Off-policy Evaluationcited by 33
- 2022Off-Policy Confidence Interval Estimation with Confounded Markov Decision Processcited by 31
- 2020Dynamic Causal Effects Evaluation in A/B Testing with a Reinforcement Learning Frameworkcited by 29
- 2017Data-Efficient Policy Evaluation Through Behavior Policy Searchcited by 25
- 2021Off-Policy Evaluation in Partially Observed Markov Decision Processes under Sequential Ignorabilitycited by 24
- 2021Real-world Ride-hailing Vehicle Repositioning using Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 22
- 2021Interference, Bias, and Variance in Two-Sided Marketplace Experimentation: Guidance for Platformscited by 22
- 2022Markovian Interference in Experimentscited by 22
- 2017Time series experiments and causal estimands: exact randomization tests and tradingcited by 21
- 2024Dual Active Learning for Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 19
- 2017A framework for Multi-A(rmed)/B(andit) testing with online FDR controlcited by 17
- 2022Switchback Experiments under Geometric Mixingcited by 17
- 2021Treatment Effects in Market Equilibriumcited by 16
- 2023A/B Testing: A Systematic Literature Reviewcited by 16
- 2020Adaptive Experimental Design with Temporal Interference: A Maximum Likelihood Approachcited by 15
- 2022Safe Exploration for Efficient Policy Evaluation and Comparisoncited by 15
- 2022Policy-Based Bayesian Experimental Design for Non-Differentiable Implicit Modelscited by 15
- 2022ReVar: Strengthening Policy Evaluation via Reduced Variance Samplingcited by 15
- 2021Rate-Optimal Cluster-Randomized Designs for Spatial Interferencecited by 14
- 2019Optimal Experimental Design for Staggered Rolloutscited by 13
- 2023Efficient Policy Evaluation with Offline Data Informed Behavior Policy Designcited by 12
- 2023Correcting for Interference in Experiments: A Case Study at Douyincited by 12
- 2024Active Adaptive Experimental Design for Treatment Effect Estimation with Covariate Choicescited by 12
50 most cited of 93 All 93 (JSON)
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
- 2026Robust Sequential Experimental Design for A/B Testingcited by 0
- 2026Robust Sequential Experimental Design for A/B Testing13 May 2026