Robust Sequential Experimental Design for A/B Testing
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Experimental design has emerged as a powerful approach for improving the sample efficiency of A/B testing, yet existing designs rely critically on correctly specified models. We study robust sequential experimental design under model misspecification and develop a unified framework that covers both contextual bandit and dynamic settings. Theoretically, we prove that our design bounds the worst-case mean squared error of the estimated treatment effect. Empirically, we demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed approach using synthetic and real-world datasets from a leading technology company.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 32 of its 80 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 May 2026.
Builds on
32 of 80 references.
References · 32
- 2021A Deep Value-network Based Approach for Multi-Driver Order Dispatchingcited by 45
- 2020Design and Analysis of Switchback Experimentscited by 37
- 2022Anytime-valid off-policy inference for contextual banditscited by 37
- 2022Off-Policy Confidence Interval Estimation with Confounded Markov Decision Processcited by 31
- 2020Dynamic Causal Effects Evaluation in A/B Testing with a Reinforcement Learning Frameworkcited by 29
- 2016Sequential Bayesian optimal experimental design via approximate dynamic programmingcited by 27
- 2022Markovian Interference in Experimentscited by 22
- 2021Multiple Randomization Designs: Estimation and Inference with Interferencecited by 20
- 2022An Instrumental Variable Approach to Confounded Off-Policy Evaluationcited by 20
- 2022Switchback Experiments under Geometric Mixingcited by 17
- 2023A/B Testing: A Systematic Literature Reviewcited by 16
- 2020Adaptive Experimental Design with Temporal Interference: A Maximum Likelihood Approachcited by 15
20 more
- 2022Conformal Off-policy Predictioncited by 14
- 2023Correcting for Interference in Experiments: A Case Study at Douyincited by 12
- 2024Active Adaptive Experimental Design for Treatment Effect Estimation with Covariate Choicescited by 12
- 2023Optimal Treatment Allocation for Efficient Policy Evaluation in Sequential Decision Makingcited by 11
- 2024Data-Driven Switchback Experiments: Theoretical Tradeoffs and Empirical Bayes Designscited by 11
- 2022Policy Evaluation for Temporal and/or Spatial Dependent Experimentscited by 8
- 2023Evaluating Dynamic Conditional Quantile Treatment Effects with Applications in Ridesharingcited by 7
- 2020Cluster-Adaptive Network A/B Testing: From Randomization to Estimationcited by 6
- 2024Unraveling the Interplay between Carryover Effects and Reward Autocorrelations in Switchback Experimentscited by 6
- 2024Combining Experimental and Historical Data for Policy Evaluationcited by 6
- 2019Synthetic learner: model-free inference on treatments over timecited by 5
- 2025Balancing Interference and Correlation in Spatial Experimental Designs: A Causal Graph Cut Approachcited by 5
- 2022Detecting Interference in A/B Testing with Increasing Allocationcited by 4
- 2023Leveraging covariate adjustments at scale in online A/B testingcited by 4
- 2021An Online Sequential Test for Qualitative Treatment Effectscited by 2
- 2025A Two-armed Bandit Framework for A/B Testingcited by 2
- 2026Budgeted Active Experimentation for Treatment Effect Estimation from Observational and Randomized Datacited by 2
- 2014Model-Robust Designs for Quantile Regressioncited by 1
- 2025Estimation of Treatment Effects Under Nonstationarity via the Truncated Policy Gradient Estimatorcited by 1
- 2026Designing Time Series Experiments in A/B Testing with Transformer Reinforcement Learningcited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.