mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Data-Efficient Policy Evaluation Through Behavior Policy Search

arXiv 1706.03469 ↗First posted 12 Jun 2017cs.AIcited by 25

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We consider the task of evaluating a policy for a Markov decision process (MDP). The standard unbiased technique for evaluating a policy is to deploy the policy and observe its performance. We show that the data collected from deploying a different policy, commonly called the behavior policy, can be used to produce unbiased estimates with lower mean squared error than this standard technique. We derive an analytic expression for the optimal behavior policy --- the behavior policy that minimizes the mean squared error of the resulting estimates. Because this expression depends on terms that are unknown in practice, we propose a novel policy evaluation sub-problem, behavior policy search: searching for a behavior policy that reduces mean squared error. We present a behavior policy search algorithm and empirically demonstrate its effectiveness in lowering the mean squared error of policy performance estimates.

Key facts. Cited by 25 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 12 Jun 2017.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 1; 2023: 3; 2024: 8; 2025: 7; 2026: 5.

25 papers.

Sort:

  1. 2021Robust On-Policy Sampling for Data-Efficient Policy Evaluation in Reinforcement Learningcited by 15
  2. 2022ReVar: Strengthening Policy Evaluation via Reduced Variance Samplingcited by 15
  3. 2023Efficient Policy Evaluation with Offline Data Informed Behavior Policy Designcited by 12
  4. 2024Policy Gradient with Active Importance Samplingcited by 9
  5. 2024Doubly Optimal Policy Evaluation for Reinforcement Learningcited by 7
  6. 2024Unraveling the Interplay between Carryover Effects and Reward Autocorrelations in Switchback Experimentscited by 6
  7. 2024Efficient Policy Evaluation with Safety Constraint for Reinforcement Learningcited by 5
  8. 2025Adaptive Exploration for Multi-Reward Multi-Policy Evaluationcited by 5
  9. 2025Balancing Interference and Correlation in Spatial Experimental Designs: A Causal Graph Cut Approachcited by 5
  10. 2023SPEED: Experimental Design for Policy Evaluation in Linear Heteroscedastic Banditscited by 3
  11. 2024Logarithmic Neyman Regret for Adaptive Estimation of the Average Treatment Effectcited by 3
  12. 2024Adaptive Exploration for Data-Efficient General Value Function Evaluationscited by 2
13 more
  1. 2025Optimistic Algorithms for Adaptive Estimation of the Average Treatment Effectcited by 2
  2. 2023Efficient Open-world Reinforcement Learning via Knowledge Distillation and Autonomous Rule Discoverycited by 1
  3. 2024SaVeR: Optimal Data Collection Strategy for Safe Policy Evaluation in Tabular MDPcited by 1
  4. 2024Truncating Trajectories in Monte Carlo Policy Evaluation: an Adaptive Approachcited by 1
  5. 2025Demystifying the Paradox of Importance Sampling with an Estimated History-Dependent Behavior Policy in Off-Policy Evaluationcited by 1
  6. 2025Behaviour Policy Optimization: Provably Lower Variance Return Estimates for Off-Policy Reinforcement Learningcited by 1
  7. 2026Designing Time Series Experiments in A/B Testing with Transformer Reinforcement Learningcited by 1
  8. 2026Value Bonuses using Ensemble Errors for Exploration in Reinforcement Learningcited by 1
  9. 2026Robust Data-Collection Policy Learning for Low-Variance Online Policy Evaluationcited by 1
  10. 2025Clustered KL-barycenter design for policy evaluationcited by 0
  11. 2025Evaluation-Aware Reinforcement Learningcited by 0
  12. 2026Actor-Critic with Active Importance Samplingcited by 0
  13. 2026Training ML Models with Predictable Failurescited by 0