mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Graph cluster randomization: network exposure to multiple universes

arXiv 1305.6979 ↗First posted 30 May 2013cs.SI physics.soc-ph stat.MEcited by 42

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

A/B testing is a standard approach for evaluating the effect of online experiments; the goal is to estimate the `average treatment effect' of a new feature or condition by exposing a sample of the overall population to it. A drawback with A/B testing is that it is poorly suited for experiments involving social interference, when the treatment of individuals spills over to neighboring individuals along an underlying social network. In this work, we propose a novel methodology using graph clustering to analyze average treatment effects under social interference. To begin, we characterize graph-theoretic conditions under which individuals can be considered to be `network exposed' to an experiment. We then show how graph cluster randomization admits an efficient exact algorithm to compute the probabilities for each vertex being network exposed under several of these exposure conditions. Using these probabilities as inverse weights, a Horvitz-Thompson estimator can then provide an effect estimate that is unbiased, provided that the exposure model has been properly specified. Given an estimator that is unbiased, we focus on minimizing the variance. First, we develop simple sufficient conditions for the variance of the estimator to be asymptotically small in n, the size of the graph. However, for general randomization schemes, this variance can be lower bounded by an exponential function of the degrees of a graph. In contrast, we show that if a graph satisfies a restricted-growth condition on the growth rate of neighborhoods, then there exists a natural clustering algorithm, based on vertex neighborhoods, for which the variance of the estimator can be upper bounded by a linear function of the degrees. Thus we show that proper cluster randomization can lead to exponentially lower estimator variance when experimentally measuring average treatment effects under interference.

Key facts. Cited by 42 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 30 May 2013.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 5; 2023: 8; 2024: 9; 2025: 11; 2026: 7.

42 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2022Learning Causal Effects on Hypergraphscited by 31
  2. 2022Markovian Interference in Experimentscited by 22
  3. 2024Multi-Armed Bandits with Interferencecited by 10
  4. 2024Multi-Armed Bandits with Network Interferencecited by 8
  5. 2022Sample Constrained Treatment Effect Estimationcited by 7
  6. 2023Causal Message Passing for Experiments with Unknown and General Network Interferencecited by 7
  7. 2024Unraveling the Interplay between Carryover Effects and Reward Autocorrelations in Switchback Experimentscited by 6
  8. 2023Causal Lifting and Link Predictioncited by 5
  9. 2023Inferring Individual Direct Causal Effects Under Heterogeneous Peer Influencecited by 5
  10. 2025Graph-Dependent Regret Bounds in Multi-Armed Bandits with Interferencecited by 5
  11. 2025Balancing Interference and Correlation in Spatial Experimental Designs: A Causal Graph Cut Approachcited by 5
  12. 2024Graph Machine Learning based Doubly Robust Estimator for Network Causal Effectscited by 4
30 more
  1. 2023A Two-Part Machine Learning Approach to Characterizing Network Interference in A/B Testingcited by 3
  2. 2023Tackling Interference Induced by Data Training Loops in A/B Tests: A Weighted Training Approachcited by 3
  3. 2023Clustered Switchback Designs for Experimentation Under Spatio-temporal Interferencecited by 3
  4. 2024Uplift Modeling Under Limited Supervisioncited by 3
  5. 2025Simulating and Experimenting with Social Media Mobilization Using LLM Agentscited by 3
  6. 2022Network Synthetic Interventions: A Causal Framework for Panel Data Under Network Interferencecited by 2
  7. 2024Cascade-based Randomization for Inferring Causal Effects under Diffusion Interferencecited by 2
  8. 2024Causal Deepsets for Off-policy Evaluation under Spatial or Spatio-temporal Interferencescited by 2
  9. 2025A Two-armed Bandit Framework for A/B Testingcited by 2
  10. 2021Feedback Shaping: A Modeling Approach to Nurture Content Creationcited by 1
  11. 2022Treatment Effect Estimation with Observational Network Data using Machine Learningcited by 1
  12. 2023Contagion Effect Estimation Using Proximal Embeddingscited by 1
  13. 2024Model-Based Inference and Experimental Design for Interference Using Partial Network Datacited by 1
  14. 2025Learning Exposure Mapping Functions for Inferring Heterogeneous Peer Effectscited by 1
  15. 2025Differences-in-Neighbors for Network Interference in Experimentscited by 1
  16. 2025Bayesian Estimation of Causal Effects Using Proxies of a Latent Interference Networkcited by 1
  17. 2025On Evolution-Based Models for Experimentation Under Interferencecited by 1
  18. 2026Designing Time Series Experiments in A/B Testing with Transformer Reinforcement Learningcited by 1
  19. 2026Choosing Online Experiment Designs under Interference in Ads, Recommendations, and Member-Experience Systemscited by 1
  20. 2026The Price of Isolation: Estimating the Ecosystem Cost of Symmetric Two-Sided A/B Testingcited by 1
  21. 2021LinkLouvain: Link-Aware A/B Testing and Its Application on Online Marketing Campaigncited by 0
  22. 2023Near-Optimal Experimental Design Under the Budget Constraint in Online Platformscited by 0
  23. 2024A/B testing under Interference with Partial Network Informationcited by 0
  24. 2025Qini Curve Estimation under Clustered Network Interferencecited by 0
  25. 2025Estimating Causal Effects in Networks with Cluster-Based Banditscited by 0
  26. 2025Unbiased Platform-Level Causal Estimation for Search Systems: A Competitive Isolation PSM-DID Frameworkcited by 0
  27. 2026Journey to the Centre of Cluster: Harnessing Interior Nodes for A/B Testing under Network Interferencecited by 0
  28. 2026Causal Effects with Unobserved Unit Types in Interacting Human-AI Systemscited by 0
  29. 2026Adaptive Policy Learning Under Unknown Network Interferencecited by 0
  30. 2026Learning to target with network interferencecited by 0