Feedback by Design: Understanding and Overcoming User Feedback Barriers in Conversational Agents
On the map: LLM agents and tool use → General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks
also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)
High-quality feedback is essential for effective human-AI interaction. It bridges knowledge gaps, corrects digressions, and shapes system behavior; both during interaction and throughout model development. Yet despite its importance, human feedback to AI is often infrequent and low quality. This gap motivates a critical examination of human feedback during interactions with AIs. To understand and overcome the challenges preventing users from giving high-quality feedback, we conducted two studies examining feedback dynamics between humans and conversational agents (CAs). Our formative study, through the lens of Grice's maxims, identified four Feedback Barriers -- Common Ground, Verifiability, Communication, and Informativeness -- that prevent high-quality feedback by users. Building on these findings, we derive three design desiderata and show that systems incorporating scaffolds aligned with these desiderata enabled users to provide higher-quality feedback. Finally, we detail a call for action to the broader AI community for advances in Large Language Models capabilities to overcome Feedback Barriers.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 81 of its 161 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Feb 2026.
Builds on
81 of 161 references.
Closest ancestors · 1
Same direction, newest first
Other references · 80
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
- 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,160
- 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 7,916
- 2023Lost in the Middle: How Language Models Use Long Contextscited by 3,383
- 2017Explanation in Artificial Intelligence: Insights from the Social Sciencescited by 1,201
- 2023Language Models Don't Always Say What They Think: Unfaithful Explanations in Chain-of-Thought Promptingcited by 1,081
- 2023Towards Understanding Sycophancy in Language Modelscited by 988
- 2023CRITIC: Large Language Models Can Self-Correct with Tool-Interactive Critiquingcited by 751
- 2021Retrieval Augmentation Reduces Hallucination in Conversationcited by 691
- 2024A Survey on Large Language Models for Code Generationcited by 646
- 2023RLAIF vs. RLHF: Scaling Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback with AI Feedbackcited by 615
- 2023A Prompt Pattern Catalog to Enhance Prompt Engineering with ChatGPTcited by 612
38 more
- 2024A Survey on RAG Meeting LLMs: Towards Retrieval-Augmented Large Language Modelscited by 450
- 2024A Systematic Survey of Prompt Engineering in Large Language Models: Techniques and Applicationscited by 428
- 2025LLMs Get Lost In Multi-Turn Conversationcited by 400
- 2023RAGTruth: A Hallucination Corpus for Developing Trustworthy Retrieval-Augmented Language Modelscited by 272
- 2025Why Language Models Hallucinatecited by 205
- 2024Disentangling Length from Quality in Direct Preference Optimizationcited by 194
- 2024Large Language Models for Education: A Survey and Outlookcited by 185
- 2025MultiChallenge: A Realistic Multi-Turn Conversation Evaluation Benchmark Challenging to Frontier LLMscited by 171
- 2024Agent AI: Surveying the Horizons of Multimodal Interactioncited by 167
- 2017A Survey on Dialogue Systems: Recent Advances and New Frontierscited by 162
- 2023Cultural Bias and Cultural Alignment of Large Language Modelscited by 149
- 2020A Survey on Conversational Recommender Systemscited by 142
- 2025CollabLLM: From Passive Responders to Active Collaboratorscited by 117
- 2024Know Your Limits: A Survey of Abstention in Large Language Modelscited by 116
- 2024Emergent social conventions and collective bias in LLM populationscited by 115
- 2025A Comprehensive Survey on Long Context Language Modelingcited by 113
- 2024What Large Language Models Know and What People Think They Knowcited by 109
- 2024When combinations of humans and AI are useful: A systematic review and meta-analysiscited by 100
- 2024CriticBench: Benchmarking LLMs for Critique-Correct Reasoningcited by 88
- 2025PlanGenLLMs: A Modern Survey of LLM Planning Capabilitiescited by 82
- 2020Recent Advances and Challenges in Task-oriented Dialog Systemcited by 78
- 2024LongCite: Enabling LLMs to Generate Fine-grained Citations in Long-context QAcited by 78
- 2024Found in the Middle: How Language Models Use Long Contexts Better via Plug-and-Play Positional Encodingcited by 72
- 2024Modeling Future Conversation Turns to Teach LLMs to Ask Clarifying Questionscited by 70
- 2023Bridging the Gap: A Survey on Integrating (Human) Feedback for Natural Language Generationcited by 55
- 2024Can Large Language Models be Good Emotional Supporter? Mitigating Preference Bias on Emotional Support Conversationcited by 55
- 2023The Past, Present and Better Future of Feedback Learning in Large Language Models for Subjective Human Preferences and Valuescited by 53
- 2024Learning to Clarify: Multi-turn Conversations with Action-Based Contrastive Self-Trainingcited by 53
- 2025Why human-AI relationships need socioaffective alignmentcited by 47
- 2025PersonaLens: A Benchmark for Personalization Evaluation in Conversational AI Assistantscited by 44
- 2017Machine Teaching: A New Paradigm for Building Machine Learning Systemscited by 41
- 2021Putting Humans in the Natural Language Processing Loop: A Surveycited by 40
- 2024A Taxonomy for Human-LLM Interaction Modes: An Initial Explorationcited by 38
- 2024Learning to Ask: When LLM Agents Meet Unclear Instructioncited by 38
- 2024WildFeedback: Aligning LLMs With In-situ User Interactions And Feedbackcited by 31
- 2025Is Long Context All You Need? Leveraging LLM's Extended Context for NL2SQLcited by 30
- 2023Selective Explanations: Leveraging Human Input to Align Explainable AIcited by 29
- 2023The Trickle-down Impact of Reward (In-)consistency on RLHFcited by 29
50 most cited of 80 All 80 (JSON)
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 4.
4 papers.
- 2026Synthetic Users, Real Differences: an Evaluation Framework for User Simulation in Multi-Turn Conversationscited by 2
- 2026Caring Without Feeling: Affective Dynamics as the Control Layer of Human-AI Agent Collaborationcited by 1
- 2026MOONWALK: Mediating Operations with Intent-Evidence-Action Alignment Across Junior-Supervisor Review Workflows in Animation/VFX Pre-Productioncited by 0
- 2026Gricea: An Open Science Platform for Conversational AI Researchcited by 0
- 2026Gricea: An Open Science Platform for Conversational AI Research18 Sep 2026
- 2026MOONWALK: Mediating Operations with Intent-Evidence-Action Alignment Across Junior-Supervisor Review Workflows in Animation/VFX Pre-Production9 Sep 2026
- 2026Caring Without Feeling: Affective Dynamics as the Control Layer of Human-AI Agent Collaboration8 May 2026
- 2026Synthetic Users, Real Differences: an Evaluation Framework for User Simulation in Multi-Turn Conversations4 May 2026
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2024The Future of Open Human Feedback
- 2024Mapping out the Space of Human Feedback for Reinforcement Learning: A Conceptual Framework
- 2025Agentic Workflows for Conversational Human-AI Interaction Design
- 2024Challenges in Human-Agent Communication
- 2024Comparing Rationality Between Large Language Models and Humans: Insights and Open Questions
- 2025A Desideratum for Conversational Agents: Capabilities, Challenges, and Future Directions
- 2024Constraining Participation: Affordances of Feedback Features in Interfaces to Large Language Models ↗
- 2026What Are You Doing? Effects of Intermediate Feedback from Agentic LLM In-Car Assistants During Multi-Step Processing