mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Comparing Rationality Between Large Language Models and Humans: Insights and Open Questions

arXiv 2403.09798 ↗First posted 14 Mar 2024cs.CYcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

This paper delves into the dynamic landscape of artificial intelligence, specifically focusing on the burgeoning prominence of large language models (LLMs). We underscore the pivotal role of Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) in augmenting LLMs' rationality and decision-making prowess. By meticulously examining the intricate relationship between human interaction and LLM behavior, we explore questions surrounding rationality and performance disparities between humans and LLMs, with particular attention to the Chat Generative Pre-trained Transformer. Our research employs comprehensive comparative analysis and delves into the inherent challenges of irrationality in LLMs, offering valuable insights and actionable strategies for enhancing their rationality. These findings hold significant implications for the widespread adoption of LLMs across diverse domains and applications, underscoring their potential to catalyze advancements in artificial intelligence.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 14 Mar 2024.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 2.

4 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024RLHF Deciphered: A Critical Analysis of Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback for LLMs
  2. 2023Studying and improving reasoning in humans and machines
  3. 2026Understanding Large Language Models
  4. 2024CogBench: a large language model walks into a psychology lab
  5. 2025Noise, Adaptation, and Strategy: Assessing LLM Fidelity in Decision-Making
  6. 2024Large Model Strategic Thinking, Small Model Efficiency: Transferring Theory of Mind in Large Language Models
  7. 2024A critical review of methods and challenges in large language models
  8. 2026Emulating Aggregate Human Choice Behavior and Biases with GPT Conversational Agents