mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

MOONWALK: Mediating Operations with Intent-Evidence-Action Alignment Across Junior-Supervisor Review Workflows in Animation/VFX Pre-Production

arXiv 2609.10385 ↗First posted 9 Sep 2026cs.HC cs.AI cs.GRcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Animation and VFX pre-production review requires teams to translate loosely specified creative intent--briefs, evolving specifications, heterogeneous references, and verbal decisions--into revisions that junior artists can execute without repeated clarification. In practice, criteria drift across iterations, review judgments lose their evidential basis, and the reasoning behind a request rarely survives the senior-junior handoff. We contribute a design framework for intent-evidence-action alignment: intent is articulated into a shared project record, judgments are anchored to grounded evidence, and authorized decisions are converted into clear revision tasks tied directly to reference notes. We instantiate this framework in MOONWALK, a professional pre-production review system comprising a shared intent record, reference/specification anchoring, structured work-in-progress comparison, and supervisor-authorized action planning. In this workflow, AI handles administrative coordination--flagging missing context and organizing notes--while artists retain full creative direction. An in-studio study with professional practitioners compares MOONWALK with a chat-only (chatbot) interface using matched production materials, while participants' existing workflows provide a retrospective ecological baseline. Results indicate stronger intent alignment, decision traceability, and checklist executability, while also showing that aesthetic authority and final prioritization must remain with practitioners. The evaluation establishes the value of the integrated structured workflow over unstructured conversational AI chatbot. Code: https://github.com/Akinesia112/Moonwalk/tree/english-version

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 32 of its 74 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Sep 2026.

Builds on

32 of 74 references.

References · 32

  1. 2024MLLM-as-a-Judge: Assessing Multimodal LLM-as-a-Judge with Vision-Language Benchmarkcited by 362
  2. 2023Generative artificial intelligence enhances creativity but reduces the diversity of novel contentcited by 165
  3. 2024Who Validates the Validators? Aligning LLM-Assisted Evaluation of LLM Outputs with Human Preferencescited by 142
  4. 2024Prometheus-Vision: Vision-Language Model as a Judge for Fine-Grained Evaluationcited by 123
  5. 2024Limitations of the LLM-as-a-Judge Approach for Evaluating LLM Outputs in Expert Knowledge Taskscited by 102
  6. 2023EvalLM: Interactive Evaluation of Large Language Model Prompts on User-Defined Criteriacited by 73
  7. 2025Interactive Debugging and Steering of Multi-Agent AI Systemscited by 68
  8. 2024Critic-V: VLM Critics Help Catch VLM Errors in Multimodal Reasoningcited by 50
  9. 2023CreativeConnect: Supporting Reference Recombination for Graphic Design Ideation with Generative AIcited by 34
  10. 2025EditDuet: A Multi-Agent System for Video Non-Linear Editingcited by 16
  11. 2025VisJudge-Bench: Aesthetics and Quality Assessment of Visualizationscited by 16
  12. 2025AIdeation: Designing a Human-AI Collaborative Ideation System for Concept Designerscited by 14
20 more
  1. 2024LogoMotion: Visually-Grounded Code Synthesis for Creating and Editing Animationcited by 10
  2. 2025ArtMentor: AI-Assisted Evaluation of Artworks to Explore Multimodal Large Language Models Capabilitiescited by 9
  3. 2025PosterMate: Audience-driven Collaborative Persona Agents for Poster Designcited by 9
  4. 2025When Teams Embrace AI: Human Collaboration Strategies in Generative Prompting in a Creative Design Taskcited by 8
  5. 2024MemoVis: A GenAI-Powered Tool for Creating Companion Reference Images for 3D Design Feedbackcited by 7
  6. 2025CineVision: An Interactive Pre-visualization Storyboard System for Director-Cinematographer Collaborationcited by 7
  7. 2025More AI Assistance Reduces Cognitive Engagement: Examining the AI Assistance Dilemma in AI-Supported Note-Takingcited by 7
  8. 2025Reflecting on Design Paradigms of Animated Data Video Toolscited by 6
  9. 2025Compositional Structures as Substrates for Human-AI Co-creation Environment: A Design Approach and A Case Studycited by 6
  10. 2025POET: Supporting Prompting Creativity and Personalization with Automated Expansion of Text-to-Image Generationcited by 6
  11. 2024LADICA: A Large Shared Display Interface for Generative AI Cognitive Assistance in Co-Located Team Collaborationcited by 5
  12. 2025GenTune: Toward Traceable Prompts to Improve Controllability of Image Refinement in Environment Designcited by 5
  13. 2026Feedback by Design: Understanding and Overcoming User Feedback Barriers in Conversational Agentscited by 4
  14. 2026PrevizWhiz: Combining Rough 3D Scenes and 2D Video to Guide Generative Video Previsualizationcited by 4
  15. 2025MeetMap: Real-Time Collaborative Dialogue Mapping with LLMs in Online Meetingscited by 3
  16. 2025MapStory: Prototyping Editable Map Animations with LLM Agentscited by 3
  17. 2026Reflexis: Supporting Reflexivity and Rigor in Collaborative Qualitative Analysis through Design for Deliberationcited by 3
  18. 2025Are We On Track? AI-Assisted Active and Passive Goal Reflection During Meetingscited by 2
  19. 2025What Does Success Look Like? Catalyzing Meeting Intentionality with AI-Assisted Prospective Reflectioncited by 1
  20. 2025Towards Aligning Multimodal LLMs with Human Experts: A Focus on Parent-Child Interactioncited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.