mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Breaking Up with Normatively Monolithic Agency with GRACE: A Reason-Based Neuro-Symbolic Architecture for Safe and Ethical AI Alignment

arXiv 2601.10520 ↗First posted 15 Jan 2026cs.AI cs.CYcited by 5

On the map: LLM reasoning → Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation

Abstract (arXiv)

As AI agents become increasingly autonomous, widely deployed in consequential contexts, and efficacious in bringing about real-world impacts, ensuring that their decisions are not only instrumentally effective but also normatively aligned has become critical. We introduce a neuro-symbolic reason-based containment architecture, Governor for Reason-Aligned ContainmEnt (GRACE), that decouples normative reasoning from instrumental decision-making and can contain AI agents of virtually any design. GRACE restructures decision-making into three modules: a Moral Module (MM) that determines permissible macro actions via deontic logic-based reasoning; a Decision-Making Module (DMM) that encapsulates the target agent while selecting instrumentally optimal primitive actions in accordance with derived macro actions; and a Guard that monitors and enforces moral compliance. The MM uses a reason-based formalism providing a semantic foundation for deontic logic, enabling interpretability, contestability, and justifiability. Its symbolic representation enriches the DMM's informational context and supports formal verification and statistical guarantees of alignment enforced by the Guard. We demonstrate GRACE on an example of a LLM therapy assistant, showing how it enables stakeholders to understand, contest, and refine agent behavior.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 22 of its 63 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Jan 2026.

Builds on

22 of 63 references.

References · 22

  1. 2023Generative Agents: Interactive Simulacra of Human Behaviorcited by 3,568
  2. 2022Constitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI Feedbackcited by 3,050
  3. 2016Concrete Problems in AI Safetycited by 1,642
  4. 2023Open Problems and Fundamental Limitations of Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 759
  5. 2017Safe Reinforcement Learning via Shieldingcited by 449
  6. 2020Artificial Intelligence, Values and Alignmentcited by 448
  7. 2025AI Agents vs. Agentic AI: A Conceptual Taxonomy, Applications and Challengescited by 169
  8. 2019Neural-Symbolic Computing: An Effective Methodology for Principled Integration of Machine Learning and Reasoningcited by 151
  9. 2024Scaling Laws for Reward Model Overoptimization in Direct Alignment Algorithmscited by 143
  10. 2024Social Choice Should Guide AI Alignment in Dealing with Diverse Human Feedbackcited by 100
  11. 2024Towards Guaranteed Safe AI: A Framework for Ensuring Robust and Reliable AI Systemscited by 96
  12. 2016Research Priorities for Robust and Beneficial Artificial Intelligencecited by 74
10 more
  1. 2024Safetywashing: Do AI Safety Benchmarks Actually Measure Safety Progress?cited by 61
  2. 2024Beyond Preferences in AI Alignmentcited by 49
  3. 2025Characterizing AI Agents for Alignment and Governancecited by 30
  4. 2022Online Shielding for Reinforcement Learningcited by 22
  5. 2023Hybrid Approaches for Moral Value Alignment in AI Agents: a Manifestocited by 7
  6. 2025Agentic AI and Multiagentic: Are We Reinventing the Wheel?cited by 5
  7. 2025Disentangling AI Alignment: A Structured Taxonomy Beyond Safety and Ethicscited by 3
  8. 2025Justifications for Democratizing AI Alignment and Their Prospectscited by 2
  9. 2024Acting for the Right Reasons: Creating Reason-Sensitive Artificial Moral Agentscited by 1
  10. 2025Integrating Reason-Based Moral Decision-Making in the Reinforcement Learning Architecturecited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 5.

5 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Normative Conflicts and Shallow AI Alignment
  2. 2026MoralityGym: A Benchmark for Evaluating Hierarchical Moral Alignment in Sequential Decision-Making Agents
  3. 2025CogniAlign: Survivability-Grounded Multi-Agent Moral Reasoning for Safe and Transparent AI
  4. 2026Moral Competence Before Moral Content: Why LLM Agents Lack the Prerequisites for Coherent Alignment
  5. 2026Beyond Binary Moral Judgment: Modeling Ethical Pluralism in AI
  6. 2025NAEL: Non-Anthropocentric Ethical Logic
  7. 2025Moral Responsibility or Obedience: What Do We Want from AI?
  8. 2026FormalJudge: A Neuro-Symbolic Paradigm for Agentic Oversight