mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Integrating Reason-Based Moral Decision-Making in the Reinforcement Learning Architecture

arXiv 2507.15895 ↗First posted 20 Jul 2025cs.AI cs.CY cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Reinforcement Learning is a machine learning methodology that has demonstrated strong performance across a variety of tasks. In particular, it plays a central role in the development of artificial autonomous agents. As these agents become increasingly capable, market readiness is rapidly approaching, which means those agents, for example taking the form of humanoid robots or autonomous cars, are poised to transition from laboratory prototypes to autonomous operation in real-world environments. This transition raises concerns leading to specific requirements for these systems - among them, the requirement that they are designed to behave ethically. Crucially, research directed toward building agents that fulfill the requirement to behave ethically - referred to as artificial moral agents(AMAs) - has to address a range of challenges at the intersection of computer science and philosophy. This study explores the development of reason-based artificial moral agents (RBAMAs). RBAMAs are build on an extension of the reinforcement learning architecture to enable moral decision-making based on sound normative reasoning, which is achieved by equipping the agent with the capacity to learn a reason-theory - a theory which enables it to process morally relevant propositions to derive moral obligations - through case-based feedback. They are designed such that they adapt their behavior to ensure conformance to these obligations while they pursue their designated tasks. These features contribute to the moral justifiability of the their actions, their moral robustness, and their moral trustworthiness, which proposes the extended architecture as a concrete and deployable framework for the development of AMAs that fulfills key ethical desiderata. This study presents a first implementation of an RBAMA and demonstrates the potential of RBAMAs in initial experiments.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 20 Jul 2025.

Builds on

0 of 0 references.

No references here yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024Acting for the Right Reasons: Creating Reason-Sensitive Artificial Moral Agents
  2. 2024Why should we ever automate moral decision making?
  3. 2026Metanormative Theory for RL-Based Moral Agents
  4. 2023Hybrid Approaches for Moral Value Alignment in AI Agents: a Manifesto
  5. 2026Beyond Binary Moral Judgment: Modeling Ethical Pluralism in AI
  6. 2026Are LLMs Bad at Moral Reasoning?
  7. 2025Developmental Support Approach to AI's Autonomous Growth: Toward the Realization of a Mutually Beneficial Stage Through Experiential Learning
  8. 2024Reinforcement Learning and Machine ethics:a systematic review