mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Prune-Then-Plan: Step-Level Calibration for Stable Frontier Exploration in Embodied Question Answering

arXiv 2511.19768 ↗First posted 24 Nov 2025cs.CV cs.AI cs.ROcited by 2

On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → VLM benchmarks and visual reasoning

Abstract (arXiv)

Large vision-language models (VLMs) have improved embodied question answering (EQA) agents by providing strong semantic priors for open-vocabulary reasoning. However, when used directly for step-level exploration, VLMs often exhibit frontier oscillations, unstable back-and-forth movements caused by overconfidence and miscalibration, leading to inefficient navigation and degraded answer quality. We propose Prune-Then-Plan, a simple and effective framework that stabilizes exploration through step-level calibration. Instead of trusting raw VLM scores, our method prunes implausible frontier choices using a Holm-Bonferroni inspired pruning procedure and then delegates final decisions to a coverage-based planner. This separation converts overconfident predictions into conservative, interpretable actions by relying on human-level judgments to calibrate the step-level behavior of VLMs. Integrated into the 3D-Mem EQA framework, our approach achieves relative improvements of up to 49% and 33% in visually grounded SPL and LLM-Match metrics respectively over baselines. Overall, our method achieves better scene coverage under equal exploration budgets on both OpenEQA and EXPRESS-Bench datasets.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in VLM benchmarks and visual reasoning, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. Builds on 28 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Nov 2025.

Builds on

28 of 36 references.

Closest ancestors · 3

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025Identifying and Mitigating Position Bias of Multi-image Vision-Language Models18 Mar
  2. 2025Words or Vision: Do Vision-Language Models Have Blind Faith in Text?4 Mar
  3. 2022BLIP: Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training for Unified Vision-Language Understanding and Generation28 Jan

Other references · 25

  1. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
  2. 2023BLIP-2: Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training with Frozen Image Encoders and Large Language Modelscited by 6,137
  3. 2023Lost in the Middle: How Language Models Use Long Contextscited by 3,455
  4. 2023Evaluating Object Hallucination in Large Vision-Language Modelscited by 1,729
  5. 2018On Evaluation of Embodied Navigation Agentscited by 547
  6. 2020How Can We Know When Language Models Know? On the Calibration of Language Models for Question Answeringcited by 445
  7. 2023An Embodied Generalist Agent in 3D Worldcited by 365
  8. 2023Robots That Ask For Help: Uncertainty Alignment for Large Language Model Plannerscited by 308
  9. 2023A Survey of Confidence Estimation and Calibration in Large Language Modelscited by 256
  10. 2023VLFM: Vision-Language Frontier Maps for Zero-Shot Semantic Navigationcited by 205
  11. 2024Hierarchical Open-Vocabulary 3D Scene Graphs for Language-Grounded Robot Navigationcited by 196
  12. 2025Context Length Alone Hurts LLM Performance Despite Perfect Retrievalcited by 127
13 more
  1. 2024Vision-and-Language Navigation Today and Tomorrow: A Survey in the Era of Foundation Modelscited by 79
  2. 20243D-Mem: 3D Scene Memory for Embodied Exploration and Reasoningcited by 75
  3. 2024Explore until Confident: Efficient Exploration for Embodied Question Answeringcited by 74
  4. 2024Overconfidence is Key: Verbalized Uncertainty Evaluation in Large Language and Vision-Language Modelscited by 54
  5. 2024GraphEQA: Using 3D Semantic Scene Graphs for Real-time Embodied Question Answeringcited by 37
  6. 2025CityEQA: A Hierarchical LLM Agent on Embodied Question Answering Benchmark in City Spacecited by 32
  7. 2025Beyond the Destination: A Novel Benchmark for Exploration-Aware Embodied Question Answeringcited by 30
  8. 2024Uncertainty-Aware Evaluation for Vision-Language Modelscited by 29
  9. 2024Reference-free Hallucination Detection for Large Vision-Language Modelscited by 23
  10. 2025Confidence Calibration in Vision-Language-Action Modelscited by 12
  11. 2023Simple Token-Level Confidence Improves Caption Correctnesscited by 11
  12. 2024Map-based Modular Approach for Zero-shot Embodied Question Answeringcited by 9
  13. 2025MaLoRA: Gated Modality LoRA for Key-Space Alignment in Multimodal LLM Fine-Tuningcited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026FAST-EQA: Efficient Embodied Question Answering with Global and Local Region Relevancy
  2. 2024EfficientEQA: An Efficient Approach to Open-Vocabulary Embodied Question Answering
  3. 2025Multi-Step Reasoning for Embodied Question Answering via Tool Augmentation
  4. 2026Hierarchical Floorplan-Guided Vision-Language Exploration for Embodied Question Answering ↗
  5. 2026Semantic Flip: Synthetic OOD Generation for Robust Refusal in Embodied Question Answering and Spatial Localization
  6. 2026Extending Embodied Question Answering from Perception to Decision
  7. 2024NoisyEQA: Benchmarking Embodied Question Answering Against Noisy Queries
  8. 2026ERQA-Plus: A Diagnostic Benchmark for Reasoning in Embodied AI