mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Robust Physical Adversarial Patches Using Dynamically Optimized Clusters

arXiv 2511.18656 ↗First posted 23 Nov 2025cs.CVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Physical adversarial attacks on deep learning systems is concerning due to the ease of deploying such attacks, usually by placing an adversarial patch in a scene to manipulate the outcomes of a deep learning model. Training such patches typically requires regularization that improves physical realizability (e.g., printability, smoothness) and/or robustness to real-world variability (e.g. deformations, viewing angle, noise). One type of variability that has received little attention is scale variability. When a patch is rescaled, either digitally through downsampling/upsampling or physically through changing imaging distances, interpolation-induced color mixing occurs. This smooths out pixel values, resulting in a loss of high-frequency patterns and degrading the adversarial signal. To address this, we present a novel superpixel-based regularization method that guides patch optimization to scale-resilient structures. Our ap proach employs the Simple Linear Iterative Clustering (SLIC) algorithm to dynamically cluster pixels in an adversarial patch during optimization. The Implicit Function Theorem is used to backpropagate gradients through SLIC to update the superpixel boundaries and color. This produces patches that maintain their structure over scale and are less susceptible to interpolation losses. Our method achieves greater performance in the digital domain, and when realized physically, these performance gains are preserved, leading to improved physical performance. Real-world performance was objectively assessed using a novel physical evaluation protocol that utilizes screens and cardboard cut-outs to systematically vary real-world conditions.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 45 of its 65 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Nov 2025.

Builds on

45 of 65 references.

References · 45

  1. 2015Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networkscited by 9,617
  2. 2020End-to-End Object Detection with Transformerscited by 7,384
  3. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
  4. 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,326
  5. 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,114
  6. 2016Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networkscited by 2,976
  7. 2016Adversarial examples in the physical worldcited by 1,762
  8. 2016YOLO9000: Better, Faster, Strongercited by 1,429
  9. 2015DeepFool: a simple and accurate method to fool deep neural networkscited by 1,315
  10. 2019Adversarial Examples Are Not Bugs, They Are Featurescited by 950
  11. 2015The Limitations of Deep Learning in Adversarial Settingscited by 784
  12. 2015Distillation as a Defense to Adversarial Perturbations against Deep Neural Networkscited by 675
33 more
  1. 2017Adversarial Examples Are Not Easily Detected: Bypassing Ten Detection Methodscited by 542
  2. 2017Countering Adversarial Images using Input Transformationscited by 517
  3. 2017Adversarial Patchcited by 514
  4. 2017Feature Squeezing: Detecting Adversarial Examples in Deep Neural Networkscited by 484
  5. 2019On Evaluating Adversarial Robustnesscited by 442
  6. 2017Adversarial Examples for Semantic Segmentation and Object Detectioncited by 275
  7. 2019Fooling automated surveillance cameras: adversarial patches to attack person detectioncited by 268
  8. 2018Physical Adversarial Examples for Object Detectorscited by 163
  9. 2019AdvHat: Real-world adversarial attack on ArcFace Face ID systemcited by 161
  10. 2019Making an Invisibility Cloak: Real World Adversarial Attacks on Object Detectorscited by 155
  11. 2022Adversarial Texture for Fooling Person Detectors in the Physical Worldcited by 96
  12. 2021Adversarial Sticker: A Stealthy Attack Method in the Physical Worldcited by 92
  13. 2018Superpixel Sampling Networkscited by 79
  14. 2020Superpixel Segmentation with Fully Convolutional Networkscited by 72
  15. 2022Physical Adversarial Attack meets Computer Vision: A Decade Surveycited by 66
  16. 2019End-to-End Learnable Geometric Vision by Backpropagating PnP Optimizationcited by 65
  17. 2016Defensive Distillation is Not Robust to Adversarial Examplescited by 60
  18. 2022T-SEA: Transfer-based Self-Ensemble Attack on Object Detectioncited by 59
  19. 2017NO Need to Worry about Adversarial Examples in Object Detection in Autonomous Vehiclescited by 48
  20. 2023Physically Realizable Natural-Looking Clothing Textures Evade Person Detectors via 3D Modelingcited by 41
  21. 2023DAP: A Dynamic Adversarial Patch for Evading Person Detectorscited by 40
  22. 2023Physically Adversarial Infrared Patches with Learnable Shapes and Locationscited by 38
  23. 2022Fooling the Eyes of Autonomous Vehicles: Robust Physical Adversarial Examples Against Traffic Sign Recognition Systemscited by 27
  24. 2022HOTCOLD Block: Fooling Thermal Infrared Detectors with a Novel Wearable Designcited by 27
  25. 2017Extending Defensive Distillationcited by 23
  26. 2023Unified Adversarial Patch for Visible-Infrared Cross-modal Attacks in the Physical Worldcited by 21
  27. 2020Dynamic Adversarial Patch for Evading Object Detection Modelscited by 20
  28. 2023Physical Adversarial Attacks for Surveillance: A Surveycited by 15
  29. 2021Adversarial Attacks against a Satellite-borne Multispectral Cloud Detectorcited by 11
  30. 2023Dynamic Adversarial Attacks on Autonomous Driving Systemscited by 11
  31. 2020UnMask: Adversarial Detection and Defense Through Robust Feature Alignmentcited by 8
  32. 2018Unauthorized AI cannot Recognize Me: Reversible Adversarial Examplecited by 4
  33. 2024Breaking the Illusion: Real-world Challenges for Adversarial Patches in Object Detectioncited by 4

Built on by

Not cited yet.