When is a System Discoverable from Data? Discovery Requires Chaos
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The deep learning revolution has enabled major AI advances in physical sciences, particularly in discovering dynamical systems from observational data. Yet the reliability of learned surrogates and symbolically discovered models is often undermined by non-uniqueness: models may fit observed trajectories perfectly, but lack genuine predictive power. We show that chaos, despite its association with unpredictability, is often what makes governing equations discoverable. We prove that the classical Lorenz system is analytically discoverable and verify experimentally that for many systems out-of-domain generalization emerges precisely at chaos onset. Conservative systems, by contrast, are inherently non-discoverable from data alone. The prevalence of chaotic systems in benchmarks may have inadvertently obscured this limitation. These findings help explain why AI excels at weather forecasting, yet struggles in many engineering applications: the systems most amenable to discovery (chaotic ones) are often least amenable to control.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 65 of its 177 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Nov 2025.
Builds on
65 of 177 references.
References · 65
- 2018Neural Ordinary Differential Equationscited by 3,779
- 2020Fourier Neural Operator for Parametric Partial Differential Equationscited by 2,908
- 2022FourCastNet: A Global Data-driven High-resolution Weather Model using Adaptive Fourier Neural Operatorscited by 776
- 2019Hamiltonian Neural Networkscited by 712
- 2021E(3)-Equivariant Graph Neural Networks for Data-Efficient and Accurate Interatomic Potentialscited by 708
- 2022Scientific Machine Learning through Physics-Informed Neural Networks: Where we are and What's nextcited by 608
- 2019AI Feynman: a Physics-Inspired Method for Symbolic Regressioncited by 548
- 2021Machine learning accelerated computational fluid dynamicscited by 471
- 2022PDEBENCH: An Extensive Benchmark for Scientific Machine Learningcited by 413
- 2020Lagrangian Neural Networkscited by 398
- 2019Deep symbolic regression: Recovering mathematical expressions from data via risk-seeking policy gradientscited by 309
- 2018Deep Hidden Physics Models: Deep Learning of Nonlinear Partial Differential Equationscited by 235
38 more
- 2023Neural Operators for Accelerating Scientific Simulations and Designcited by 221
- 2021Contemporary Symbolic Regression Methods and their Relative Performancecited by 215
- 2022End-to-end symbolic regression with transformerscited by 203
- 2024Poseidon: Efficient Foundation Models for PDEscited by 200
- 2021Neural Symbolic Regression that Scalescited by 192
- 2022FourCastNet: Accelerating Global High-Resolution Weather Forecasting using Adaptive Fourier Neural Operatorscited by 188
- 2023GenCast: Diffusion-based ensemble forecasting for medium-range weathercited by 177
- 2020Physics-informed learning of governing equations from scarce datacited by 167
- 2019Explainable Machine Learning for Scientific Insights and Discoveriescited by 166
- 2022Pangu-Weather: A 3D High-Resolution Model for Fast and Accurate Global Weather Forecastcited by 166
- 2018Learning Equations for Extrapolation and Controlcited by 156
- 2024The Well: a Large-Scale Collection of Diverse Physics Simulations for Machine Learningcited by 145
- 2021Enhancing Computational Fluid Dynamics with Machine Learningcited by 138
- 2024LLM-SR: Scientific Equation Discovery via Programming with Large Language Modelscited by 133
- 2020SINDy-PI: A Robust Algorithm for Parallel Implicit Sparse Identification of Nonlinear Dynamicscited by 125
- 2016Extrapolation and learning equationscited by 110
- 2021Neural Flows: Efficient Alternative to Neural ODEscited by 101
- 2024Weak baselines and reporting biases lead to overoptimism in machine learning for fluid-related partial differential equationscited by 91
- 2024Symbolic Regression with a Learned Concept Librarycited by 83
- 2019DeepMoD: Deep learning for Model Discovery in noisy datacited by 71
- 2023Can Physics-Informed Neural Networks beat the Finite Element Method?cited by 68
- 2022Symbolic Physics Learner: Discovering governing equations via Monte Carlo tree searchcited by 66
- 2023Representation Equivalent Neural Operators: a Framework for Alias-free Operator Learningcited by 57
- 2019Learning Symbolic Physics with Graph Networkscited by 53
- 2024Does equivariance matter at scale?cited by 52
- 2017Extracting Sparse High-Dimensional Dynamics from Limited Datacited by 50
- 2021Machine Learning in the Search for New Fundamental Physicscited by 50
- 2022Real-time high-resolution CO2 geological storage prediction using nested Fourier neural operatorscited by 47
- 2025What Has a Foundation Model Found? Using Inductive Bias to Probe for World Modelscited by 47
- 2020A Survey of Deep Learning for Scientific Discoverycited by 36
- 2023Plasma Surrogate Modelling using Fourier Neural Operatorscited by 29
- 2023Deep Generative Symbolic Regressioncited by 28
- 2024Lie Algebra Canonicalization: Equivariant Neural Operators under arbitrary Lie Groupscited by 24
- 2018Numerical Aspects for Approximating Governing Equations Using Datacited by 21
- 2022PDE-LEARN: Using Deep Learning to Discover Partial Differential Equations from Noisy, Limited Datacited by 20
- 2023Benchmarking sparse system identification with low-dimensional chaoscited by 19
- 2022Solving Seismic Wave Equations on Variable Velocity Models with Fourier Neural Operatorcited by 18
- 2022A Review of Data-Driven Discovery for Dynamic Systemscited by 18
50 most cited of 65 All 65 (JSON)
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 6.
6 papers.
- 2026Position: A Dynamical Systems Perspective is Needed to Advance Time Series Modelingcited by 4
- 2026Theory and interpretability of Quantum Extreme Learning Machines: a Pauli-transfer matrix approachcited by 1
- 2026The Dynamics of Discoverability: How Trajectories and Priors Shape Equation Recoverycited by 1
- 2026Symbolic recovery of PDEs from measurement datacited by 0
- 2026Flow map learning in nonlinear vector autoregressive models: influence of the feature-library structure on the training errorcited by 0
- 2026How Low Can You Go? Active Learning for Sparse Model Discovery in the Ultra-Low-Data Limitcited by 0
- 2026The Dynamics of Discoverability: How Trajectories and Priors Shape Equation Recovery20 Jul 2026
- 2026How Low Can You Go? Active Learning for Sparse Model Discovery in the Ultra-Low-Data Limit10 Jun 2026
- 2026Flow map learning in nonlinear vector autoregressive models: influence of the feature-library structure on the training error29 May 2026
- 2026Theory and interpretability of Quantum Extreme Learning Machines: a Pauli-transfer matrix approach20 Feb 2026
- 2026Position: A Dynamical Systems Perspective is Needed to Advance Time Series Modeling18 Feb 2026
- 2026Symbolic recovery of PDEs from measurement data17 Feb 2026