mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Flow map learning in nonlinear vector autoregressive models: influence of the feature-library structure on the training error

arXiv 2605.31438 ↗First posted 29 May 2026cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Time series forecasting often requires learning nonlinear and time-delayed dependencies. A paradigmatic class of forecasting models are nonlinear vector autoregressive processes (NVAR), also known as next-generation reservoir computers (NG-RCs). These models approximate the Koopman operator on the space spanned by their explicit feature library. We consider the identifiability problem for learning Markovian nonlinear dynamical systems and show that the training error as a function of time resolution follows characteristic (pre-)asymptotic scaling laws. These laws depend on whether the feature library can represent the early Lie-series coefficients of the flow map (propagator) exactly or merely approximately. For dynamical systems governed by polynomial vector fields, we demonstrate the mechanism for NVAR/NG-RC models with monomial and Fourier feature libraries. We determine the dependence of the training error on the temporal resolution, the involved nonlinear degree, and the number of delay terms. While delay terms reduce the optimal one-step training error, they improve long-horizon forecasts only when the library provides sufficient nonlinearity. Thus, small training error coexists with weak generalization as the model class is mismatched to the true data-generating process. Numerical experiments on various chaotic dynamical systems confirm the theoretical predictions.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 45 of its 110 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 May 2026.

Builds on

45 of 110 references.

References · 45

  1. 2015Scheduled Sampling for Sequence Prediction with Recurrent Neural Networkscited by 803
  2. 2020The effect of data encoding on the expressive power of variational quantum machine learning modelscited by 333
  3. 2021Modern Koopman Theory for Dynamical Systemscited by 276
  4. 2021Next Generation Reservoir Computingcited by 160
  5. 2019Generalization in Generation: A closer look at Exposure Biascited by 123
  6. 2018Discovering physical concepts with neural networkscited by 117
  7. 2020On Linear Identifiability of Learned Representationscited by 105
  8. 2018Multistep Neural Networks for Data-driven Discovery of Nonlinear Dynamical Systemscited by 89
  9. 2019Data-driven approximation of the Koopman generator: Model reduction, system identification, and controlcited by 85
  10. 2015How (not) to Train your Generative Model: Scheduled Sampling, Likelihood, Adversary?cited by 78
  11. 2017On Convergence of Extended Dynamic Mode Decomposition to the Koopman Operatorcited by 73
  12. 2022Learning Dynamical Systems via Koopman Operator Regression in Reproducing Kernel Hilbert Spacescited by 67
33 more
  1. 2023Generalized Teacher Forcing for Learning Chaotic Dynamicscited by 58
  2. 2020From Fourier to Koopman: Spectral Methods for Long-term Time Series Predictioncited by 50
  3. 2021Koopman Operator Dynamical Models: Learning, Analysis and Controlcited by 42
  4. 2023Model scale versus domain knowledge in statistical forecasting of chaotic systemscited by 27
  5. 2021Finite-data error bounds for Koopman-based prediction and controlcited by 26
  6. 2022Interpretable Polynomial Neural Ordinary Differential Equationscited by 24
  7. 2022Learning Spatiotemporal Chaos Using Next-Generation Reservoir Computingcited by 20
  8. 2017Koopman-based lifting techniques for nonlinear systems identificationcited by 18
  9. 2023Flow Map Learning for Unknown Dynamical Systems: Overview, Implementation, and Benchmarkscited by 18
  10. 2021The Discovery of Dynamics via Linear Multistep Methods and Deep Learning: Error Estimationcited by 14
  11. 2024Koopman Operators in Robot Learningcited by 13
  12. 2022Convergence of weak-SINDy Surrogate Modelscited by 11
  13. 2022Catch-22s of reservoir computingcited by 11
  14. 2023Deep-OSG: Deep Learning of Operators in Semigroupcited by 11
  15. 2023Extrapolating tipping points and simulating non-stationary dynamics of complex systems using efficient machine learningcited by 9
  16. 2022Identifiability and Asymptotics in Learning Homogeneous Linear ODE Systems from Discrete Observationscited by 8
  17. 2022Exploring the limits of multifunctionality across different reservoir computerscited by 7
  18. 2024Surrogate modeling with functional nonlinear autoregressive models (F-NARX)cited by 6
  19. 2025When is a System Discoverable from Data? Discovery Requires Chaoscited by 6
  20. 2021Generalizing Dynamic Mode Decomposition: Balancing Accuracy and Expressiveness in Koopman Approximationscited by 5
  21. 2024How more data can hurt: Instability and regularization in next-generation reservoir computingcited by 5
  22. 2025Learning with Imperfect Models: When Multi-step Prediction Mitigates Compounding Errorcited by 5
  23. 2023Invariance Proximity: Closed-Form Error Bounds for Finite-Dimensional Koopman-Based Modelscited by 4
  24. 2022`Next Generation' Reservoir Computing: an Empirical Data-Driven Expression of Dynamical Equations in Time-Stepping Formcited by 3
  25. 2022Carleman Linearization of Nonlinear Systems and Its Finite-Section Approximationscited by 3
  26. 2023Finite Dimensional Koopman Form of Polynomial Nonlinear Systemscited by 3
  27. 2024Physics-informed nonlinear vector autoregressive models for the prediction of dynamical systemscited by 3
  28. 2025On the emergence of numerical instabilities in Next Generation Reservoir Computingcited by 3
  29. 2017Explicit Error Bounds for Carleman Linearizationcited by 2
  30. 2022Temporal Forward-Backward Consistency, Not Residual Error, Measures the Prediction Accuracy of Extended Dynamic Mode Decompositioncited by 2
  31. 2025Machine-Precision Prediction of Low-Dimensional Chaotic Systems from Noise-Free Datacited by 1
  32. 2026Why are there many equally good models? An Anatomy of the Rashomon Effectcited by 1
  33. 2026Theory and interpretability of Quantum Extreme Learning Machines: a Pauli-transfer matrix approachcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.