mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Perceptual Quality Assessment of 3D Gaussian Splatting: A Subjective Dataset and Prediction Metric

arXiv 2511.08032 ↗First posted 11 Nov 2025cs.CVcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

With the rapid advancement of 3D visualization, 3D Gaussian Splatting (3DGS) has emerged as a leading technique for real-time, high-fidelity rendering. While prior research has emphasized algorithmic performance and visual fidelity, the perceptual quality of 3DGS-rendered content, especially under varying reconstruction conditions, remains largely underexplored. In practice, factors such as viewpoint sparsity, limited training iterations, point downsampling, noise, and color distortions can significantly degrade visual quality, yet their perceptual impact has not been systematically studied. To bridge this gap, we present 3DGS-QA, the first subjective quality assessment dataset for 3DGS. It comprises 225 degraded reconstructions across 15 object types, enabling a controlled investigation of common distortion factors. Based on this dataset, we introduce a no-reference quality prediction model that directly operates on native 3D Gaussian primitives, without requiring rendered images or ground-truth references. Our model extracts spatial and photometric cues from the Gaussian representation to estimate perceived quality in a structure-aware manner. We further benchmark existing quality assessment methods, spanning both traditional and learning-based approaches. Experimental results show that our method consistently achieves superior performance, highlighting its robustness and effectiveness for 3DGS content evaluation. The dataset and code are made publicly available at https://github.com/diaoyn/3DGSQA to facilitate future research in 3DGS quality assessment.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 27 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Nov 2025.

Builds on

14 of 27 references.

References · 14

  1. 2018The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Deep Features as a Perceptual Metriccited by 11,029
  2. 2017Graph Attention Networkscited by 8,854
  3. 20233D Gaussian Splatting for Real-Time Radiance Field Renderingcited by 6,141
  4. 2015ShapeNet: An Information-Rich 3D Model Repositorycited by 2,880
  5. 2022Exploring CLIP for Assessing the Look and Feel of Imagescited by 974
  6. 2023GaussianShader: 3D Gaussian Splatting with Shading Functions for Reflective Surfacescited by 249
  7. 2023EAGLES: Efficient Accelerated 3D Gaussians with Lightweight EncodingScited by 191
  8. 2021RAPIQUE: Rapid and Accurate Video Quality Prediction of User Generated Contentcited by 100
  9. 2020Point Cloud Quality Assessment: Dataset Construction and Learning-based No-Reference Metriccited by 51
  10. 2023DISTWAR: Fast Differentiable Rendering on Raster-based Rendering Pipelinescited by 35
  11. 2024MirrorGaussian: Reflecting 3D Gaussians for Reconstructing Mirror Reflectionscited by 21
  12. 2024A Benchmark for Gaussian Splatting Compression and Quality Assessment Studycited by 16
2 more
  1. 2025GS-QA: Comprehensive Quality Assessment Benchmark for Gaussian Splatting View Synthesiscited by 8
  2. 2025CLIP-PCQA: Exploring Subjective-Aligned Vision-Language Modeling for Point Cloud Quality Assessmentcited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.