IF-CRITIC: Towards a Fine-Grained LLM Critic for Instruction-Following Evaluation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Instruction-following is a fundamental ability of Large Language Models (LLMs), requiring their generated outputs to follow multiple constraints imposed in input instructions. Numerous studies have attempted to enhance this ability through preference optimization or reinforcement learning based on reward signals from LLM-as-a-Judge. However, existing evaluation models for instruction-following still possess many deficiencies, such as substantial costs and unreliable assessments. To this end, we propose IF-CRITIC, an LLM critic for fine-grained, efficient, and reliable instruction-following evaluation. We first develop a checklist generator to decompose instructions and generate constraint checklists. With the assistance of the checklists, we collect high-quality critique training data through a multi-stage critique filtering mechanism and employ a constraint-level preference optimization method to train IF-CRITIC. Extensive experiments show that the evaluation performance of IF-CRITIC can beat strong LLM-as-a-Judge baselines, including o4-mini and Gemini-3-Pro. With the reward signals provided by IF-CRITIC, LLMs can achieve substantial performance gains in instruction-following optimization under lower computational overhead compared to strong LLM critic baselines. Our code and model are available at https://github.com/thu-coai/IF-CRITIC.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 48 of its 80 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Nov 2025.
Builds on
48 of 80 references.
References · 48
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
- 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 8,851
- 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,393
- 2021Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Codecited by 8,053
- 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 7,916
- 2023Efficient Memory Management for Large Language Model Serving with PagedAttentioncited by 5,767
- 2024HybridFlow: A Flexible and Efficient RLHF Frameworkcited by 1,980
- 2024MMLU-Pro: A More Robust and Challenging Multi-Task Language Understanding Benchmarkcited by 1,758
- 2024LlamaFactory: Unified Efficient Fine-Tuning of 100+ Language Modelscited by 1,442
- 2019ZeRO: Memory Optimizations Toward Training Trillion Parameter Modelscited by 1,278
- 2024ChatGLM: A Family of Large Language Models from GLM-130B to GLM-4 All Toolscited by 1,096
36 more
- 2023Can LLMs Express Their Uncertainty? An Empirical Evaluation of Confidence Elicitation in LLMscited by 946
- 2023Prometheus: Inducing Fine-grained Evaluation Capability in Language Modelscited by 558
- 2024Prometheus 2: An Open Source Language Model Specialized in Evaluating Other Language Modelscited by 431
- 2023Is ChatGPT a Good NLG Evaluator? A Preliminary Studycited by 420
- 2023How Far Can Camels Go? Exploring the State of Instruction Tuning on Open Resourcescited by 405
- 2023Trustworthy LLMs: a Survey and Guideline for Evaluating Large Language Models' Alignmentcited by 394
- 2024Justice or Prejudice? Quantifying Biases in LLM-as-a-Judgecited by 354
- 2025Rubrics as Rewards: Reinforcement Learning Beyond Verifiable Domainscited by 328
- 2024Direct Language Model Alignment from Online AI Feedbackcited by 257
- 2025Skywork-Reward-V2: Scaling Preference Data Curation via Human-AI Synergycited by 204
- 2023Generative Judge for Evaluating Alignmentcited by 163
- 2025RM-R1: Reward Modeling as Reasoningcited by 149
- 2024Benchmarking Complex Instruction-Following with Multiple Constraints Compositioncited by 147
- 2025OpenRubrics: Towards Scalable Synthetic Rubric Generation for Reward Modeling and LLM Alignmentcited by 118
- 2025Checklists Are Better Than Reward Models For Aligning Language Modelscited by 115
- 2024Multi-IF: Benchmarking LLMs on Multi-Turn and Multilingual Instructions Followingcited by 94
- 2023Exploring the Use of Large Language Models for Reference-Free Text Quality Evaluation: An Empirical Studycited by 85
- 2024Self-play with Execution Feedback: Improving Instruction-following Capabilities of Large Language Modelscited by 73
- 2024Foundational Autoraters: Taming Large Language Models for Better Automatic Evaluationcited by 72
- 2023CritiqueLLM: Towards an Informative Critique Generation Model for Evaluation of Large Language Model Generationcited by 65
- 2024CFBench: A Comprehensive Constraints-Following Benchmark for LLMscited by 65
- 2024Evaluating LLMs at Detecting Errors in LLM Responsescited by 49
- 2025VerIF: Verification Engineering for Reinforcement Learning in Instruction Followingcited by 43
- 2024Improving Large Language Models via Fine-grained Reinforcement Learning with Minimum Editing Constraintcited by 39
- 2024Why Do Large Language Models (LLMs) Struggle to Count Letters?cited by 37
- 2025Improve LLM-as-a-Judge Ability as a General Abilitycited by 35
- 2024Direct Judgement Preference Optimizationcited by 33
- 2024IOPO: Empowering LLMs with Complex Instruction Following via Input-Output Preference Optimizationcited by 30
- 2024Counting Ability of Large Language Models and Impact of Tokenizationcited by 29
- 2024ChatGLM-RLHF: Practices of Aligning Large Language Models with Human Feedbackcited by 25
- 2025R3: Robust Rubric-Agnostic Reward Modelscited by 22
- 2024Themis: A Reference-free NLG Evaluation Language Model with Flexibility and Interpretabilitycited by 19
- 2024RuleR: Improving LLM Controllability by Rule-based Data Recyclingcited by 11
- 2024A Systematic Examination of Preference Learning through the Lens of Instruction-Followingcited by 8
- 2023DecompEval: Evaluating Generated Texts as Unsupervised Decomposed Question Answeringcited by 7
- 2025Reverse Preference Optimization for Complex Instruction Followingcited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 4.
4 papers.
- 2026IF-RewardBench: Benchmarking Judge Models for Instruction-Following Evaluationcited by 8
- 2026The Stability Trap: Evaluating the Reliability of LLM-Based Instruction Adherence Auditingcited by 1
- 2026MTAC-IFBench: Benchmarking Instruction-Following in Multi-Turn Agentic Codingcited by 0
- 2026ScopeIF: Improving Scope-Aware Precise Instruction-Following in Large Language Models via Graded Reward Modelingcited by 0
- 2026ScopeIF: Improving Scope-Aware Precise Instruction-Following in Large Language Models via Graded Reward Modeling26 Sep 2026
- 2026MTAC-IFBench: Benchmarking Instruction-Following in Multi-Turn Agentic Coding14 Sep 2026
- 2026IF-RewardBench: Benchmarking Judge Models for Instruction-Following Evaluation5 Mar 2026
- 2026The Stability Trap: Evaluating the Reliability of LLM-Based Instruction Adherence Auditing16 Jan 2026
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2023FollowEval: A Multi-Dimensional Benchmark for Assessing the Instruction-Following Capability of Large Language Models
- 2023Becoming self-instruct: introducing early stopping criteria for minimal instruct tuning
- 2024SPaR: Self-Play with Tree-Search Refinement to Improve Instruction-Following in Large Language Models
- 2024Enhancing and Assessing Instruction-Following with Fine-Grained Instruction Variants
- 2025MM-IFEngine: Towards Multimodal Instruction Following
- 2024ROSE: A Reward-Oriented Data Selection Framework for LLM Task-Specific Instruction Tuning
- 2024ACING: Actor-Critic for Instruction Learning in Black-Box LLMs
- 2026Cross-Relational Preference Learning for Better LLM Instruction Following