mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Reverse Preference Optimization for Complex Instruction Following

arXiv 2505.22172 ↗First posted 28 May 2025cs.CLcited by 3

On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → LLM preference optimization methods

Abstract (arXiv)

Instruction following (IF) is a critical capability for large language models (LLMs). However, handling complex instructions with multiple constraints remains challenging. Previous methods typically select preference pairs based on the number of constraints they satisfy, introducing noise where chosen examples may fail to follow some constraints and rejected examples may excel in certain respects over the chosen ones. To address the challenge of aligning with multiple preferences, we propose a simple yet effective method called Reverse Preference Optimization (RPO). It mitigates noise in preference pairs by dynamically reversing the constraints within the instruction to ensure the chosen response is perfect, alleviating the burden of extensive sampling and filtering to collect perfect responses. Besides, reversal also enlarges the gap between chosen and rejected responses, thereby clarifying the optimization direction and making it more robust to noise. We evaluate RPO on two multi-turn IF benchmarks, Sysbench and Multi-IF, demonstrating average improvements over the DPO baseline of 4.6 and 2.5 points (on Llama-3.1 8B), respectively. Moreover, RPO scales effectively across model sizes (8B to 70B parameters), with the 70B RPO model surpassing GPT-4o.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in LLM preference optimization methods, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 15 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 May 2025.

Builds on

15 of 31 references.

Closest ancestors · 4

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025A Survey of Direct Preference Optimization12 Mar
  2. 2024IOPO: Empowering LLMs with Complex Instruction Following via Input-Output Preference Optimization9 Nov
  3. 2024Direct Language Model Alignment from Online AI Feedback7 Feb
  4. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback4 Mar

Other references · 11

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  2. 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 10,109
  3. 2021Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Codecited by 8,320
  4. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 8,065
  5. 2024LlamaFactory: Unified Efficient Fine-Tuning of 100+ Language Modelscited by 1,464
  6. 2021GLM: General Language Model Pretraining with Autoregressive Blank Infillingcited by 1,031
  7. 2024Scaling Synthetic Data Creation with 1,000,000,000 Personascited by 417
  8. 2019On The Power of Curriculum Learning in Training Deep Networkscited by 286
  9. 2024Benchmarking Complex Instruction-Following with Multiple Constraints Compositioncited by 152
  10. 2024CFBench: A Comprehensive Constraints-Following Benchmark for LLMscited by 67
  11. 2024SysBench: Can Large Language Models Follow System Messages?cited by 28

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 1.

3 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Cross-Relational Preference Learning for Better LLM Instruction Following
  2. 2024Triple Preference Optimization: Achieving Better Alignment using a Single Step Optimization
  3. 2026IF-RewardBench: Benchmarking Judge Models for Instruction-Following Evaluation
  4. 2026STAIF: A Stage-wise Optimization for Complex Instruction Following
  5. 2025Reward-aware Preference Optimization: A Unified Mathematical Framework for Model Alignment
  6. 2024Understanding Reference Policies in Direct Preference Optimization
  7. 2024A Systematic Examination of Preference Learning through the Lens of Instruction-Following
  8. 2024SPaR: Self-Play with Tree-Search Refinement to Improve Instruction-Following in Large Language Models