mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

FollowEval: A Multi-Dimensional Benchmark for Assessing the Instruction-Following Capability of Large Language Models

arXiv 2311.09829 ↗First posted 16 Nov 2023cs.CLcited by 12

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The effective assessment of the instruction-following ability of large language models (LLMs) is of paramount importance. A model that cannot adhere to human instructions might be not able to provide reliable and helpful responses. In pursuit of this goal, various benchmarks have been constructed to evaluate the instruction-following capacity of these models. However, these benchmarks are limited to a single language and are constructed using automated approaches, which restricts their applicability and the quality of the test examples they contain. To bridge this gap, we introduce the FollowEval benchmark in this paper. This benchmark is composed of instances in both English and Chinese, and all test examples are crafted by human experts. Furthermore, the FollowEval benchmark is designed to assess LLMs across five critical dimensions of instruction following: string manipulation, commonsense reasoning, logical reasoning, spatial reasoning, and response constraints. To enhance the complexity and present a sufficient challenge, each test example is designed to evaluate more than one dimension. We have evaluated various LLMs using the FollowEval benchmark and found that their performance significantly lags behind that of humans. This highlights the considerable room for improvement in the instruction-following ability of these models.

Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Nov 2023.

Builds on

22 of 31 references.

References · 22

  1. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
  2. 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 13,028
  3. 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,626
  4. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 8,065
  5. 2022Training a Helpful and Harmless Assistant with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 3,720
  6. 2019The Curious Case of Neural Text Degenerationcited by 2,916
  7. 2023Sparks of Artificial General Intelligence: Early experiments with GPT-4cited by 2,592
  8. 2020Learning to summarize from human feedbackcited by 2,588
  9. 2023G-Eval: NLG Evaluation using GPT-4 with Better Human Alignmentcited by 2,276
  10. 2018Hierarchical Neural Story Generationcited by 1,193
  11. 2023LIMA: Less Is More for Alignmentcited by 1,100
  12. 2023Large Language Models are not Fair Evaluatorscited by 1,085
10 more
  1. 2023Is ChatGPT a Good NLG Evaluator? A Preliminary Studycited by 422
  2. 2023How Far Can Camels Go? Exploring the State of Instruction Tuning on Open Resourcescited by 408
  3. 2018Learning to Write with Cooperative Discriminatorscited by 119
  4. 2023Evaluating Large Language Models on Controlled Generation Taskscited by 73
  5. 2023COLLIE: Systematic Construction of Constrained Text Generation Taskscited by 70
  6. 2023Can Large Language Models Understand Real-World Complex Instructions?cited by 69
  7. 2023SummIt: Iterative Text Summarization via ChatGPTcited by 54
  8. 2022Controllable Text Generation with Language Constraintscited by 18
  9. 2023Improving Large Language Models in Event Relation Logical Predictioncited by 17
  10. 2023ChatLog: Carefully Evaluating the Evolution of ChatGPT Across Timecited by 12

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 8; 2026: 3.

12 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025IFEval-Audio: Benchmarking Instruction-Following Capability in Audio-based Large Language Models
  2. 2026IF-RewardBench: Benchmarking Judge Models for Instruction-Following Evaluation
  3. 2026Empowering Reliable Visual-Centric Instruction Following in MLLMs
  4. 2025AdvancedIF: Rubric-Based Benchmarking and Reinforcement Learning for Advancing LLM Instruction Following
  5. 2024Diverse and Fine-Grained Instruction-Following Ability Exploration with Synthetic Data
  6. 2024MIA-Bench: Towards Better Instruction Following Evaluation of Multimodal LLMs
  7. 2025ReasonIF: Large Reasoning Models Fail to Follow Instructions During Reasoning
  8. 2023TRACE: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Continual Learning in Large Language Models