mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

MTAC-IFBench: Benchmarking Instruction-Following in Multi-Turn Agentic Coding

arXiv 2609.14992 ↗First posted 14 Sep 2026cs.CLcited by 0

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Software engineering coding agents

Abstract (arXiv)

Recently, the rapid development of large language models (LLMs) has reshaped software engineering by enabling autonomous code agents that plan, execute, and utilize external tools iteratively to tackle complex tasks. Beyond achieving functional correctness, these agents must faithfully follow process instructions and constraints throughout the development lifecycle. However, existing benchmarks typically focus on final functional correctness or confine instruction-following evaluation to single-turn, general chat or simple code generation scenarios, leaving instruction-following in multi-turn agentic coding underexplored. To bridge this gap, we propose MTAC-IFBench, a comprehensive benchmark for this critical capability. It features multi-turn progressive software development instructions with diverse constraints spanning 6 primary and 18 secondary categories. With an average of 7.04 turns and 91.33 constraints per instance, it poses a rigorous challenge to current LLMs. To make the evaluation reliable, we construct a checklist for each constraint and functional requirement, and integrate verification scripts and judge agents to verify each checklist item. MTAC-IFBench identifies significant deficiencies in existing code agents in multi-turn instruction-following, with their performance degrading rapidly as the interaction session grows longer.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Software engineering coding agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 20 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Sep 2026.

Builds on

20 of 35 references.

Closest ancestors · 4

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2026SWE-INTERACT: Reimagining SWE Benchmarks as User-Driven Long-Horizon Coding Sessions29 Jun
  2. 2026GLM-5: from Vibe Coding to Agentic Engineering17 Feb
  3. 2026OctoBench: Benchmarking Scaffold-Aware Instruction Following in Repository-Grounded Agentic Coding15 Jan
  4. 2025Vibe Coding vs. Agentic Coding: Fundamentals and Practical Implications of Agentic AI26 May

Other references · 16

  1. 2021Measuring Coding Challenge Competence With APPScited by 879
  2. 2024A Survey on Large Language Models for Code Generationcited by 646
  3. 2026Terminal-Bench: Benchmarking Agents on Hard, Realistic Tasks in Command Line Interfacescited by 515
  4. 2023Trustworthy LLMs: a Survey and Guideline for Evaluating Large Language Models' Alignmentcited by 394
  5. 2025SWE-Bench Pro: Can AI Agents Solve Long-Horizon Software Engineering Tasks?cited by 254
  6. 2023ClassEval: A Manually-Crafted Benchmark for Evaluating LLMs on Class-level Code Generationcited by 166
  7. 2024Benchmarking Complex Instruction-Following with Multiple Constraints Compositioncited by 147
  8. 2024DevEval: A Manually-Annotated Code Generation Benchmark Aligned with Real-World Code Repositoriescited by 71
  9. 2024CFBench: A Comprehensive Constraints-Following Benchmark for LLMscited by 65
  10. 2025AGENTIF: Benchmarking Instruction Following of Large Language Models in Agentic Scenarioscited by 44
  11. 2025CodeIF: Benchmarking the Instruction-Following Capabilities of Large Language Models for Code Generationcited by 18
  12. 2025CodeIF-Bench: Evaluating Instruction-Following Capabilities of Large Language Models in Interactive Code Generationcited by 14
4 more
  1. 2025FronTalk: Benchmarking Front-End Development as Conversational Code Generation with Multi-Modal Feedbackcited by 14
  2. 2026CCTU: A Benchmark for Tool Use under Complex Constraintscited by 7
  3. 2025IFEvalCode: Controlled Code Generationcited by 5
  4. 2025IF-CRITIC: Towards a Fine-Grained LLM Critic for Instruction-Following Evaluationcited by 4

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025LoCoBench-Agent: An Interactive Benchmark for LLM Agents in Long-Context Software Engineering
  2. 2025PACIFIC: a framework for generating benchmarks to check Precise Automatically Checked Instruction Following In Code
  3. 2026Steerable Instruction Following Coding Data Synthesis with Actor-Parametric Schema Co-Evolution
  4. 2025SWE-Compass: Towards Unified Evaluation of Agentic Coding Abilities for Large Language Models
  5. 2024MapCoder: Multi-Agent Code Generation for Competitive Problem Solving
  6. 2026CodeForge-MA: Execution-Verified Multi-Agent Learning with Language-Conditioned LoRA for Multilingual Code Generation
  7. 2026Taming Scylla: Understanding the multi-headed agentic daemon of the coding seas
  8. 2025MapCoder-Lite: Distilling Multi-Agent Coding into a Single Small LLM