ROSE: A Reward-Oriented Data Selection Framework for LLM Task-Specific Instruction Tuning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Instruction tuning has underscored the significant potential of large language models (LLMs) in producing more human controllable and effective outputs in various domains. In this work, we focus on the data selection problem for task-specific instruction tuning of LLMs. Prevailing methods primarily rely on the crafted similarity metrics to select training data that aligns with the test data distribution. The goal is to minimize instruction tuning loss on the test data, ultimately improving performance on the target task. However, it has been widely observed that instruction tuning loss (i.e., cross-entropy loss for next token prediction) in LLMs often fails to exhibit a monotonic relationship with actual task performance. This misalignment undermines the effectiveness of current data selection methods for task-specific instruction tuning. To address this issue, we introduce ROSE, a novel Reward-Oriented inStruction data sElection method which leverages pairwise preference loss as a reward signal to optimize data selection for task-specific instruction tuning. Specifically, ROSE adapts an influence formulation to approximate the influence of training data points relative to a few-shot preference validation set to select the most task-related training data points. Experimental results show that by selecting just 5% of the training data using ROSE, our approach can achieve competitive results compared to fine-tuning with the full training dataset, and it surpasses other state-of-the-art data selection methods for task-specific instruction tuning. Our qualitative analysis further confirms the robust generalizability of our method across multiple benchmark datasets and diverse model architectures.
Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 35 of its 62 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Dec 2024.
Builds on
35 of 62 references.
References · 35
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
- 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 15,215
- 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,380
- 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 13,028
- 2018The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Deep Features as a Perceptual Metriccited by 11,177
- 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 8,065
- 2019Fine-Tuning Language Models from Human Preferencescited by 2,150
- 2017Understanding Black-box Predictions via Influence Functionscited by 1,741
- 2023LIMA: Less Is More for Alignmentcited by 1,100
- 2024SimPO: Simple Preference Optimization with a Reference-Free Rewardcited by 963
- 2023The Flan Collection: Designing Data and Methods for Effective Instruction Tuningcited by 739
- 2023OpenAssistant Conversations -- Democratizing Large Language Model Alignmentcited by 721
23 more
- 2024LESS: Selecting Influential Data for Targeted Instruction Tuningcited by 532
- 2020What Neural Networks Memorize and Why: Discovering the Long Tail via Influence Estimationcited by 497
- 2023How Far Can Camels Go? Exploring the State of Instruction Tuning on Open Resourcescited by 408
- 2023What Makes Good Data for Alignment? A Comprehensive Study of Automatic Data Selection in Instruction Tuningcited by 364
- 2023Data Selection for Language Models via Importance Resamplingcited by 329
- 2023From Quantity to Quality: Boosting LLM Performance with Self-Guided Data Selection for Instruction Tuningcited by 307
- 2023TRAK: Attributing Model Behavior at Scalecited by 283
- 2023Pretraining Language Models with Human Preferencescited by 247
- 2023Fine-tuning Language Models for Factualitycited by 221
- 2021Post-hoc Interpretability for Neural NLP: A Surveycited by 156
- 2023Some things are more CRINGE than others: Iterative Preference Optimization with the Pairwise Cringe Losscited by 108
- 2023MoDS: Model-oriented Data Selection for Instruction Tuningcited by 107
- 2021Scale Efficiently: Insights from Pre-training and Fine-tuning Transformerscited by 106
- 2024LiPO: Listwise Preference Optimization through Learning-to-Rankcited by 96
- 2024A Survey on Data Selection for LLM Instruction Tuningcited by 77
- 2023MM-LIMA: Less Is More for Alignment in Multi-Modal Datasetscited by 61
- 2021Shapley values for feature selection: The good, the bad, and the axiomscited by 54
- 2024Smaller Language Models are capable of selecting Instruction-Tuning Training Data for Larger Language Modelscited by 32
- 2024Automated Data Curation for Robust Language Model Fine-Tuningcited by 27
- 2024DELIFT: Data Efficient Language model Instruction Fine Tuningcited by 14
- 2024Knowledge-Infused Legal Wisdom: Navigating LLM Consultation through the Lens of Diagnostics and Positive-Unlabeled Reinforcement Learningcited by 12
- 2024The Fellowship of the LLMs: Multi-Model Workflows for Synthetic Preference Optimization Dataset Generationcited by 11
- 2023Community-Based Hierarchical Positive-Unlabeled (PU) Model Fusion for Chronic Disease Predictioncited by 5
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 5; 2026: 5.
10 papers.
- 2025CrowdSelect: Synthetic Instruction Data Selection with Multi-LLM Wisdomcited by 6
- 2025Teaching According to Students' Aptitude: Personalized Mathematics Tutoring via Persona-, Memory-, and Forgetting-Aware LLMscited by 3
- 2025Active Domain Knowledge Acquisition with 100-Dollar Budget: Enhancing LLMs via Cost-Efficient, Expert-Involved Interaction in Sensitive Domainscited by 2
- 2026"Excuse me, may I say something..." CoLabScience, A Proactive AI Assistant for Biomedical Discovery and LLM-Expert Collaborationscited by 1
- 2026CODEBLOCK: Learning to Supervise Code at the Right Granularitycited by 1
- 2025CLaDMoP: Learning Transferrable Models from Successful Clinical Trials via LLMscited by 0
- 2025CLID-MU: Cross-Layer Information Divergence Based Meta Update Strategy for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 0
- 2026SUPERNOVA: Eliciting General Reasoning in LLMs with Reinforcement Learning on Natural Instructionscited by 0
- 2026Let the Target Select for Itself: Data Selection via Target-Aligned Pathscited by 0
- 2026SemiAdapt-Instruct: Extensible Instruction Tuning via Latent Domain-Specialised Adapterscited by 0
- 2026CODEBLOCK: Learning to Supervise Code at the Right Granularity10 Jun 2026
- 2026SemiAdapt-Instruct: Extensible Instruction Tuning via Latent Domain-Specialised Adapters26 May 2026
- 2026Let the Target Select for Itself: Data Selection via Target-Aligned Paths10 May 2026
- 2026"Excuse me, may I say something..." CoLabScience, A Proactive AI Assistant for Biomedical Discovery and LLM-Expert Collaborations16 Apr 2026
- 2026SUPERNOVA: Eliciting General Reasoning in LLMs with Reinforcement Learning on Natural Instructions9 Apr 2026
- 2025Teaching According to Students' Aptitude: Personalized Mathematics Tutoring via Persona-, Memory-, and Forgetting-Aware LLMs19 Nov 2025
- 2025Active Domain Knowledge Acquisition with 100-Dollar Budget: Enhancing LLMs via Cost-Efficient, Expert-Involved Interaction in Sensitive Domains24 Aug 2025
- 2025CLID-MU: Cross-Layer Information Divergence Based Meta Update Strategy for Learning with Noisy Labels16 Jul 2025
- 2025CLaDMoP: Learning Transferrable Models from Successful Clinical Trials via LLMs24 May 2025
- 2025CrowdSelect: Synthetic Instruction Data Selection with Multi-LLM Wisdom3 Mar 2025
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Aligning Instruction Tuning with Pre-training
- 2023Tuna: Instruction Tuning using Feedback from Large Language Models
- 2024Unleashing the Power of Data Tsunami: A Comprehensive Survey on Data Assessment and Selection for Instruction Tuning of Language Models
- 2025BLEUBERI: BLEU is a surprisingly effective reward for instruction following
- 2024Selective Reflection-Tuning: Student-Selected Data Recycling for LLM Instruction-Tuning
- 2026IF-RewardBench: Benchmarking Judge Models for Instruction-Following Evaluation
- 2025LEAD: Iterative Data Selection for Efficient LLM Instruction Tuning
- 2023Self-Evolved Diverse Data Sampling for Efficient Instruction Tuning