mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Themis: A Reference-free NLG Evaluation Language Model with Flexibility and Interpretability

arXiv 2406.18365 ↗First posted 26 Jun 2024cs.CLcited by 19

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The evaluation of natural language generation (NLG) tasks is a significant and longstanding research area. With the recent emergence of powerful large language models (LLMs), some studies have turned to LLM-based automatic evaluation methods, which demonstrate great potential to become a new evaluation paradigm following traditional string-based and model-based metrics. However, despite the improved performance of existing methods, they still possess some deficiencies, such as dependency on references and limited evaluation flexibility. Therefore, in this paper, we meticulously construct a large-scale NLG evaluation corpus NLG-Eval with annotations from both human and GPT-4 to alleviate the lack of relevant data in this field. Furthermore, we propose Themis, an LLM dedicated to NLG evaluation, which has been trained with our designed multi-perspective consistency verification and rating-oriented preference alignment methods. Themis can conduct flexible and interpretable evaluations without references, and it exhibits superior evaluation performance on various NLG tasks, simultaneously generalizing well to unseen tasks and surpassing other evaluation models, including GPT-4.

Key facts. Cited by 19 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 70 of its 105 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Jun 2024.

Builds on

70 of 105 references.

References · 70

  1. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
  2. 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 13,958
  3. 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,393
  4. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 7,916
  5. 2022Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Modelscited by 5,601
  6. 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,462
  7. 2020Learning to summarize from human feedbackcited by 2,562
  8. 2023G-Eval: NLG Evaluation using GPT-4 with Better Human Alignmentcited by 2,205
  9. 2020BLEURT: Learning Robust Metrics for Text Generationcited by 1,196
  10. 2023LIMA: Less Is More for Alignmentcited by 1,080
  11. 2020COMET: A Neural Framework for MT Evaluationcited by 1,024
  12. 2019Plug and Play Language Models: A Simple Approach to Controlled Text Generationcited by 793
38 more
  1. 2023Can Large Language Models Be an Alternative to Human Evaluations?cited by 729
  2. 2021BARTScore: Evaluating Generated Text as Text Generationcited by 719
  3. 2020SummEval: Re-evaluating Summarization Evaluationcited by 666
  4. 2023Prometheus: Inducing Fine-grained Evaluation Capability in Language Modelscited by 558
  5. 2023Is ChatGPT a Good NLG Evaluator? A Preliminary Studycited by 420
  6. 2023Large Language Models Are State-of-the-Art Evaluators of Translation Qualitycited by 416
  7. 2020Asking and Answering Questions to Evaluate the Factual Consistency of Summariescited by 376
  8. 2021FUDGE: Controlled Text Generation With Future Discriminatorscited by 374
  9. 2021Experts, Errors, and Context: A Large-Scale Study of Human Evaluation for Machine Translationcited by 333
  10. 2023PandaLM: An Automatic Evaluation Benchmark for LLM Instruction Tuning Optimizationcited by 311
  11. 2018Newsroom: A Dataset of 1.3 Million Summaries with Diverse Extractive Strategiescited by 292
  12. 2021Understanding Factuality in Abstractive Summarization with FRANK: A Benchmark for Factuality Metricscited by 285
  13. 2022Towards a Unified Multi-Dimensional Evaluator for Text Generationcited by 264
  14. 2022CometKiwi: IST-Unbabel 2022 Submission for the Quality Estimation Shared Taskcited by 205
  15. 2023Benchmarking Foundation Models with Language-Model-as-an-Examinercited by 172
  16. 2023GEMBA-MQM: Detecting Translation Quality Error Spans with GPT-4cited by 143
  17. 2020Unsupervised Evaluation of Interactive Dialog with DialoGPTcited by 139
  18. 2015Semantically Conditioned LSTM-based Natural Language Generation for Spoken Dialogue Systemscited by 134
  19. 2020ASSET: A Dataset for Tuning and Evaluation of Sentence Simplification Models with Multiple Rewriting Transformationscited by 101
  20. 2023Shepherd: A Critic for Language Model Generationcited by 96
  21. 2023Topical-Chat: Towards Knowledge-Grounded Open-Domain Conversationscited by 88
  22. 2023Error Analysis Prompting Enables Human-Like Translation Evaluation in Large Language Modelscited by 87
  23. 2019Evaluating the State-of-the-Art of End-to-End Natural Language Generation: The E2E NLG Challengecited by 86
  24. 2023On Learning to Summarize with Large Language Models as Referencescited by 80
  25. 2018BLEU is Not Suitable for the Evaluation of Text Simplificationcited by 78
  26. 2020GRADE: Automatic Graph-Enhanced Coherence Metric for Evaluating Open-Domain Dialogue Systemscited by 76
  27. 2022Of Human Criteria and Automatic Metrics: A Benchmark of the Evaluation of Story Generationcited by 73
  28. 2023TIGERScore: Towards Building Explainable Metric for All Text Generation Taskscited by 69
  29. 2023Benchmarking Generation and Evaluation Capabilities of Large Language Models for Instruction Controllable Summarizationcited by 69
  30. 2018RankME: Reliable Human Ratings for Natural Language Generationcited by 67
  31. 2020What Have We Achieved on Text Summarization?cited by 65
  32. 2023Large Language Models are Diverse Role-Players for Summarization Evaluationcited by 62
  33. 2021OpenMEVA: A Benchmark for Evaluating Open-ended Story Generation Metricscited by 61
  34. 2023The Next Chapter: A Study of Large Language Models in Storytellingcited by 58
  35. 2018Reliability and Learnability of Human Bandit Feedback for Sequence-to-Sequence Reinforcement Learningcited by 57
  36. 2022LENS: A Learnable Evaluation Metric for Text Simplificationcited by 54
  37. 2023Evaluation Metrics in the Era of GPT-4: Reliably Evaluating Large Language Models on Sequence to Sequence Taskscited by 53
  38. 2019Investigating Evaluation of Open-Domain Dialogue Systems With Human Generated Multiple Referencescited by 48

50 most cited of 70 All 70 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 4; 2025: 13; 2026: 2.

19 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2024From Generation to Judgment: Opportunities and Challenges of LLM-as-a-judgecited by 480
  2. 2024LLMs-as-Judges: A Comprehensive Survey on LLM-based Evaluation Methodscited by 451
  3. 2025A Survey of Frontiers in LLM Reasoning: Inference Scaling, Learning to Reason, and Agentic Systemscited by 108
  4. 2025Evaluating Judges as Evaluators: The JETTS Benchmark of LLM-as-Judges as Test-Time Scaling Evaluatorscited by 42
  5. 2025Toward Generalizable Evaluation in the LLM Era: A Survey Beyond Benchmarkscited by 26
  6. 2024Training Language Models to Critique With Multi-agent Feedbackcited by 16
  7. 2025Beyond the Surface: Enhancing LLM-as-a-Judge Alignment with Human via Internal Representationscited by 14
  8. 2025J4R: Learning to Judge with Equivalent Initial State Group Relative Policy Optimizationcited by 9
  9. 2025Evaluating Text Creativity across Diverse Domains: A Dataset and Large Language Model Evaluatorcited by 9
  10. 2024Large Language Models Are Active Critics in NLG Evaluationcited by 6
  11. 2025Foundational Automatic Evaluators: Scaling Multi-Task Generative Evaluator Training for Reasoning-Centric Domainscited by 5
  12. 2025IF-CRITIC: Towards a Fine-Grained LLM Critic for Instruction-Following Evaluationcited by 4
7 more
  1. 2025On the Shelf Life of Fine-Tuned LLM-Judges: Future-Proofing, Backward-Compatibility, and Question Generalizationcited by 3
  2. 2025EvolvR: Self-Evolving Pairwise Reasoning for Story Evaluation to Enhance Generationcited by 2
  3. 2026DEFINED: A Data-Efficient Computational Framework for Fine-Grained Creativity Assessment in Debate Scenarioscited by 1
  4. 2025Learning to Align Multi-Faceted Evaluation: A Unified and Robust Frameworkcited by 0
  5. 2025The Oracle Has Spoken: A Multi-Aspect Evaluation of Dialogue in Pythiacited by 0
  6. 2025Exploring the features used for summary evaluation by Human and GPTcited by 0
  7. 2026SynCity 3000: Bootstrapping Scene-Scale 3D Diffusioncited by 0