ReMoDetect: Reward Models Recognize Aligned LLM's Generations
On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → Human values and AI feedback alignment
Abstract (arXiv)
The remarkable capabilities and easy accessibility of large language models (LLMs) have significantly increased societal risks (e.g., fake news generation), necessitating the development of LLM-generated text (LGT) detection methods for safe usage. However, detecting LGTs is challenging due to the vast number of LLMs, making it impractical to account for each LLM individually; hence, it is crucial to identify the common characteristics shared by these models. In this paper, we draw attention to a common feature of recent powerful LLMs, namely the alignment training, i.e., training LLMs to generate human-preferable texts. Our key finding is that as these aligned LLMs are trained to maximize the human preferences, they generate texts with higher estimated preferences even than human-written texts; thus, such texts are easily detected by using the reward model (i.e., an LLM trained to model human preference distribution). Based on this finding, we propose two training schemes to further improve the detection ability of the reward model, namely (i) continual preference fine-tuning to make the reward model prefer aligned LGTs even further and (ii) reward modeling of Human/LLM mixed texts (a rephrased texts from human-written texts using aligned LLMs), which serves as a median preference text corpus between LGTs and human-written texts to learn the decision boundary better. We provide an extensive evaluation by considering six text domains across twelve aligned LLMs, where our method demonstrates state-of-the-art results. Code is available at https://github.com/hyunseoklee-ai/ReMoDetect.
Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Human values and AI feedback alignment, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 37 of its 49 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 May 2024.
Builds on
37 of 49 references.
Closest ancestors · 1
Same direction, newest first
Other references · 36
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
- 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
- 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 13,028
- 2021Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Codecited by 8,320
- 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 8,065
- 2017mixup: Beyond Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 5,183
- 2023Universal and Transferable Adversarial Attacks on Aligned Language Modelscited by 3,104
- 2024Phi-3 Technical Report: A Highly Capable Language Model Locally on Your Phonecited by 1,917
- 2023Jailbroken: How Does LLM Safety Training Fail?cited by 1,651
- 2018Don't Give Me the Details, Just the Summary! Topic-Aware Convolutional Neural Networks for Extreme Summarizationcited by 1,317
- 2019PubMedQA: A Dataset for Biomedical Research Question Answeringcited by 1,288
24 more
- 2018Hierarchical Neural Story Generationcited by 1,193
- 2018Experience Replay for Continual Learningcited by 1,095
- 2021Ethical and social risks of harm from Language Modelscited by 966
- 2018Deep Anomaly Detection with Outlier Exposurecited by 942
- 2019AugMix: A Simple Data Processing Method to Improve Robustness and Uncertaintycited by 901
- 2023DetectGPT: Zero-Shot Machine-Generated Text Detection using Probability Curvaturecited by 726
- 2019Defending Against Neural Fake Newscited by 559
- 2024Self-Play Fine-Tuning Converts Weak Language Models to Strong Language Modelscited by 557
- 2019Release Strategies and the Social Impacts of Language Modelscited by 513
- 2019GLTR: Statistical Detection and Visualization of Generated Textcited by 496
- 2023How Close is ChatGPT to Human Experts? Comparison Corpus, Evaluation, and Detectioncited by 481
- 2020CSI: Novelty Detection via Contrastive Learning on Distributionally Shifted Instancescited by 441
- 2017Training Confidence-calibrated Classifiers for Detecting Out-of-Distribution Samplescited by 389
- 2023Can AI-Generated Text be Reliably Detected?cited by 386
- 2019Deep Semi-Supervised Anomaly Detectioncited by 291
- 2023Fast-DetectGPT: Efficient Zero-Shot Detection of Machine-Generated Text via Conditional Probability Curvaturecited by 287
- 2023DetectLLM: Leveraging Log Rank Information for Zero-Shot Detection of Machine-Generated Textcited by 210
- 2021PixMix: Dreamlike Pictures Comprehensively Improve Safety Measurescited by 131
- 2023AssistGPT: A General Multi-modal Assistant that can Plan, Execute, Inspect, and Learncited by 97
- 2023MGTBench: Benchmarking Machine-Generated Text Detectioncited by 93
- 2023Ghostbuster: Detecting Text Ghostwritten by Large Language Modelscited by 91
- 2022Do Language Models Plagiarize?cited by 73
- 2023Multiscale Positive-Unlabeled Detection of AI-Generated Textscited by 61
- 2023ConDA: Contrastive Domain Adaptation for AI-generated Text Detectioncited by 37
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 2; 2026: 8.
11 papers.
- 2025AdaDetectGPT: Adaptive Detection of LLM-Generated Text with Statistical Guaranteescited by 21
- 2024Online Detection of LLM-Generated Texts via Sequential Hypothesis Testing by Bettingcited by 11
- 2026Detecting LLM-Generated Text with Performance Guaranteescited by 10
- 2026Learn-to-Distance: Distance Learning for Detecting LLM-Generated Textcited by 8
- 2026Zero-Shot Detection of LLM-Generated Text via Implicit Reward Modelcited by 4
- 2025Advancing Machine-Generated Text Detection from an Easy to Hard Supervision Perspectivecited by 2
- 2026C-ReD: A Comprehensive Chinese Benchmark for AI-Generated Text Detection Derived from Real-World Promptscited by 2
- 2026Alignment Imprint: Zero-Shot AI-Generated Text Detection via Provable Preference Discrepancycited by 1
- 2026DetectZoo: A Unified Toolkit for AI-Generated Content Detection Across Text, Audio, and Image Modalitiescited by 1
- 2026C-HAT-Bench: Benchmarking Chinese AI-Text Detection Beyond Fully Generated Textcited by 0
- 2026Who's Behind the Text? Robust Model Authorship Attributioncited by 0
- 2026Who's Behind the Text? Robust Model Authorship Attribution14 Oct 2026
- 2026C-HAT-Bench: Benchmarking Chinese AI-Text Detection Beyond Fully Generated Text26 Sep 2026
- 2026DetectZoo: A Unified Toolkit for AI-Generated Content Detection Across Text, Audio, and Image Modalities2 Jun 2026
- 2026Zero-Shot Detection of LLM-Generated Text via Implicit Reward Model23 Apr 2026
- 2026Alignment Imprint: Zero-Shot AI-Generated Text Detection via Provable Preference Discrepancy18 Apr 2026
- 2026C-ReD: A Comprehensive Chinese Benchmark for AI-Generated Text Detection Derived from Real-World Prompts13 Apr 2026
- 2026Learn-to-Distance: Distance Learning for Detecting LLM-Generated Text29 Jan 2026
- 2026Detecting LLM-Generated Text with Performance Guarantees10 Jan 2026
- 2025Advancing Machine-Generated Text Detection from an Easy to Hard Supervision Perspective2 Nov 2025
- 2025AdaDetectGPT: Adaptive Detection of LLM-Generated Text with Statistical Guarantees29 Sep 2025
- 2024Online Detection of LLM-Generated Texts via Sequential Hypothesis Testing by Betting29 Oct 2024
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2024GenARM: Reward Guided Generation with Autoregressive Reward Model for Test-time Alignment
- 2025HLPD: Aligning LLMs to Human Language Preference for Machine-Revised Text Detection
- 2024Aligning to Thousands of Preferences via System Message Generalization
- 2024Reward-Augmented Data Enhances Direct Preference Alignment of LLMs
- 2024Elephant in the Room: Unveiling the Impact of Reward Model Quality in Alignment
- 2024RMB: Comprehensively Benchmarking Reward Models in LLM Alignment
- 2025Understanding the Effects of RLHF on the Quality and Detectability of LLM-Generated Texts
- 2024ABC Align: Large Language Model Alignment for Safety & Accuracy