mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Deep Learning Detection Method for Large Language Models-Generated Scientific Content

arXiv 2403.00828 ↗First posted 27 Feb 2024cs.CL cs.AI cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Large Language Models (LLMs), such as GPT-3 and BERT, reshape how textual content is written and communicated. These models have the potential to generate scientific content that is indistinguishable from that written by humans. Hence, LLMs carry severe consequences for the scientific community, which relies on the integrity and reliability of publications. This research paper presents a novel ChatGPT-generated scientific text detection method, AI-Catcher. AI-Catcher integrates two deep learning models, multilayer perceptron (MLP) and convolutional neural networks (CNN). The MLP learns the feature representations of the linguistic and statistical features. The CNN extracts high-level representations of the sequential patterns from the textual content. AI-Catcher is a multimodal model that fuses hidden patterns derived from MLP and CNN. In addition, a new ChatGPT-Generated scientific text dataset is collected to enhance AI-generated text detection tools, AIGTxt. AIGTxt contains 3000 records collected from published academic articles across ten domains and divided into three classes: Human-written, ChatGPT-generated, and Mixed text. Several experiments are conducted to evaluate the performance of AI-Catcher. The comparative results demonstrate the capability of AI-Catcher to distinguish between human-written and ChatGPT-generated scientific text more accurately than alternative methods. On average, AI-Catcher improved accuracy by 37.4%.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Feb 2024.

Builds on

6 of 37 references.

References · 6

  1. 2019XLNet: Generalized Autoregressive Pretraining for Language Understandingcited by 2,801
  2. 2015Character-level Convolutional Networks for Text Classificationcited by 2,293
  3. 2020TweepFake: about Detecting Deepfake Tweetscited by 117
  4. 2019Generating Sentiment-Preserving Fake Online Reviews Using Neural Language Models and Their Human- and Machine-based Detectioncited by 50
  5. 2022Attribution and Obfuscation of Neural Text Authorship: A Data Mining Perspectivecited by 40
  6. 2023STADEE: STAtistics-based DEEp Detection of Machine Generated Textcited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.