Flow Matching with Semidiscrete Couplings
On the map: Diffusion models → Flow matching, time series and science
Abstract (arXiv)
Flow models parameterized as time-dependent velocity fields can generate data from noise by integrating an ODE. These models are often trained using flow matching, i.e. by sampling random pairs of noise and target points (x0,x1) and ensuring that the velocity field is aligned, on average, with x1-x0 when evaluated along a segment linking x0 to x1. While these pairs are sampled independently by default, they can also be selected more carefully by matching batches of n noise to n target points using an optimal transport (OT) solver. Although promising in theory, the OT flow matching (OT-FM) approach is not widely used in practice. Zhang et al. (2025) pointed out recently that OT-FM truly starts paying off when the batch size n grows significantly, which only a multi-GPU implementation of the Sinkhorn algorithm can handle. Unfortunately, the costs of running Sinkhorn can quickly balloon, requiring O(n2/varepsilon2) operations for every n pairs used to fit the velocity field, where varepsilon is a regularization parameter that should be typically small to yield better results. To fulfill the theoretical promises of OT-FM, we propose to move away from batch-OT and rely instead on a semidiscrete formulation that leverages the fact that the target dataset distribution is usually of finite size N. The SD-OT problem is solved by estimating a dual potential vector using SGD; using that vector, freshly sampled noise vectors at train time can then be matched with data points at the cost of a maximum inner product search (MIPS). Semidiscrete FM (SD-FM) removes the quadratic dependency on n/varepsilon that bottlenecks OT-FM. SD-FM beats both FM and OT-FM on all training metrics and inference budget constraints, across multiple datasets, on unconditional/conditional generation, or when using mean-flow models.
Key facts. Cited by 13 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Flow matching, time series and science, one of 14 directions in Diffusion models. Builds on 42 of its 60 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Sep 2025.
Builds on
42 of 60 references.
Closest ancestors · 11
Same direction, newest first
- 2025Align Your Flow: Scaling Continuous-Time Flow Map Distillation17 Jun
- 2024Flow Matching Guide and Code9 Dec
- 2024Simple ReFlow: Improved Techniques for Fast Flow Models10 Oct
- 2024Flow map matching with stochastic interpolants: A mathematical framework for consistency models11 Jun
- 2024Conditional Wasserstein Distances with Applications in Bayesian OT Flow Matching27 Mar
- 2023InstaFlow: One Step is Enough for High-Quality Diffusion-Based Text-to-Image Generation12 Sep
- 2023Multisample Flow Matching: Straightening Flows with Minibatch Couplings28 Apr
- 2023Improving and generalizing flow-based generative models with minibatch optimal transport1 Feb
- 2022Flow Matching for Generative Modeling6 Oct
- 2022Rectified Flow: A Marginal Preserving Approach to Optimal Transport29 Sep
- 2022Flow Straight and Fast: Learning to Generate and Transfer Data with Rectified Flow7 Sep
Other references · 31
- 2022Classifier-Free Diffusion Guidancecited by 5,847
- 2024Scaling Rectified Flow Transformers for High-Resolution Image Synthesiscited by 4,181
- 2018Neural Ordinary Differential Equationscited by 3,779
- 2014Deep Learning Face Attributes in the Wildcited by 3,693
- 2015Variational Inference with Normalizing Flowscited by 2,170
- 2023Consistency Modelscited by 1,822
- 2018Glow: Generative Flow with Invertible 1x1 Convolutionscited by 1,545
- 2019Improved Precision and Recall Metric for Assessing Generative Modelscited by 944
- 2023Stochastic Interpolants: A Unifying Framework for Flows and Diffusionscited by 939
- 2018Computational Optimal Transportcited by 780
- 2024Open-Sora: Democratizing Efficient Video Production for Allcited by 652
- 2018FFJORD: Free-form Continuous Dynamics for Scalable Reversible Generative Modelscited by 594
19 more
- 2025Mean Flows for One-step Generative Modelingcited by 561
- 2023Improved Techniques for Training Consistency Modelscited by 439
- 2024Guiding a Diffusion Model with a Bad Version of Itselfcited by 299
- 2016Stochastic Optimization for Large-scale Optimal Transportcited by 189
- 2018Computational Optimal Transport: Complexity by Accelerated Gradient Descent Is Better Than by Sinkhorn's Algorithmcited by 112
- 2014Asymmetric LSH (ALSH) for Sublinear Time Maximum Inner Product Search (MIPS)cited by 109
- 2025Feynman-Kac Correctors in Diffusion: Annealing, Guidance, and Product of Expertscited by 96
- 2023Minimizing Trajectory Curvature of ODE-based Generative Modelscited by 89
- 2024Classifier-Free Guidance is a Predictor-Correctorcited by 84
- 2023Non-Denoising Forward-Time Diffusionscited by 77
- 2019On Efficient Optimal Transport: An Analysis of Greedy and Accelerated Mirror Descent Algorithmscited by 62
- 2024Statistical optimal transportcited by 47
- 2020Conditional Sampling with Monotone GANs: from Generative Models to Likelihood-Free Inferencecited by 42
- 2018Semi-dual Regularized Optimal Transportcited by 26
- 2023Conditional Optimal Transport on Function Spacescited by 26
- 2024Dynamic Conditional Optimal Transport through Simulation-Free Flowscited by 25
- 2024PetFace: A Large-Scale Dataset and Benchmark for Animal Identificationcited by 16
- 2016Convergence of a Newton algorithm for semi-discrete optimal transportcited by 13
- 2025On Fitting Flow Models with Large Sinkhorn Couplingscited by 11
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 4; 2026: 9.
13 papers.
Sort:
By area:
- 2025Test-time scaling of diffusions with flow mapscited by 16
- 2025Diffusion Models in Simulation-Based Inference: A Tutorial Reviewcited by 11
- 2025Counterfactual Identifiability via Dynamic Optimal Transportcited by 6
- 2026The Coupling Within: Flow Matching via Distilled Normalizing Flowscited by 3
- 2026Generalized Wasserstein Flow Matching: Transport Plans, Everywhere, All at Oncecited by 3
- 2026Optimal Transport Flow Matching by Designcited by 2
- 2026Reinforcement Learning for Flow-Matching Policies with Density Transportcited by 2
- 2025Quantifying the noise sensitivity of the Wasserstein metric for imagescited by 0
- 2026Generative Modeling of Discrete Data Using Geometric Latent Subspacescited by 0
- 2026Gromov-Monge Flow Matching for Equivariant Graph Generationcited by 0
- 2026Beyond Straightness: Non-Crossing Flow Matching via Quantile AlignTree Couplingcited by 0
- 2026Dual-guided Hierarchical Edge Localization for Large-scale Optimal Transport Across Dimensionscited by 0
1 more
- 2026Scaling Online Optimal Transport Minibatches for Flow Matching13 Oct 2026
- 2026Dual-guided Hierarchical Edge Localization for Large-scale Optimal Transport Across Dimensions11 Sep 2026
- 2026Beyond Straightness: Non-Crossing Flow Matching via Quantile AlignTree Coupling3 Sep 2026
- 2026Gromov-Monge Flow Matching for Equivariant Graph Generation27 Aug 2026
- 2026Reinforcement Learning for Flow-Matching Policies with Density Transport7 Jun 2026
- 2026Optimal Transport Flow Matching by Design2 Jun 2026
- 2026Generalized Wasserstein Flow Matching: Transport Plans, Everywhere, All at Once8 May 2026
- 2026The Coupling Within: Flow Matching via Distilled Normalizing Flows9 Mar 2026
- 2026Generative Modeling of Discrete Data Using Geometric Latent Subspaces29 Jan 2026
- 2025Diffusion Models in Simulation-Based Inference: A Tutorial Review22 Dec 2025
- 2025Test-time scaling of diffusions with flow maps27 Nov 2025
- 2025Counterfactual Identifiability via Dynamic Optimal Transport9 Oct 2025
1 more
- 2025Test-time scaling of diffusions with flow mapscited by 16
- 2025Diffusion Models in Simulation-Based Inference: A Tutorial Reviewcited by 11
- 2026The Coupling Within: Flow Matching via Distilled Normalizing Flowscited by 3
- 2026Generalized Wasserstein Flow Matching: Transport Plans, Everywhere, All at Oncecited by 3
- 2026Optimal Transport Flow Matching by Designcited by 2
- 2026Reinforcement Learning for Flow-Matching Policies with Density Transportcited by 2
- 2026Generative Modeling of Discrete Data Using Geometric Latent Subspacescited by 0
- 2026Gromov-Monge Flow Matching for Equivariant Graph Generationcited by 0
- 2026Beyond Straightness: Non-Crossing Flow Matching via Quantile AlignTree Couplingcited by 0
- 2026Scaling Online Optimal Transport Minibatches for Flow Matchingcited by 0
- 2026Scaling Online Optimal Transport Minibatches for Flow Matching13 Oct 2026
- 2026Beyond Straightness: Non-Crossing Flow Matching via Quantile AlignTree Coupling3 Sep 2026
- 2026Gromov-Monge Flow Matching for Equivariant Graph Generation27 Aug 2026
- 2026Reinforcement Learning for Flow-Matching Policies with Density Transport7 Jun 2026
- 2026Optimal Transport Flow Matching by Design2 Jun 2026
- 2026Generalized Wasserstein Flow Matching: Transport Plans, Everywhere, All at Once8 May 2026
- 2026The Coupling Within: Flow Matching via Distilled Normalizing Flows9 Mar 2026
- 2026Generative Modeling of Discrete Data Using Geometric Latent Subspaces29 Jan 2026
- 2025Diffusion Models in Simulation-Based Inference: A Tutorial Review22 Dec 2025
- 2025Test-time scaling of diffusions with flow maps27 Nov 2025
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025OAT-FM: Optimal Acceleration Transport for Improved Flow Matching
- 2024Consistency Flow Matching: Defining Straight Flows with Velocity Consistency
- 2025Beyond Optimal Transport: Model-Aligned Coupling for Flow Matching
- 2026Same Flow, Different Paths: Variance Reduction in Flow Matching
- 2026Multimarginal flow matching with optimal transport potentials
- 2026Expected Batch Optimal Transport Plans and Consequences for Flow Matching
- 2024Optimal Flow Matching: Learning Straight Trajectories in Just One Step
- 2026FlowBudget: Training-Free Sampling-Budget Estimation for Flow Matching Models