mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Flow Matching with Semidiscrete Couplings

arXiv 2509.25519 ↗First posted 29 Sep 2025cs.LG stat.MLcited by 13

On the map: Diffusion models → Flow matching, time series and science

Abstract (arXiv)

Flow models parameterized as time-dependent velocity fields can generate data from noise by integrating an ODE. These models are often trained using flow matching, i.e. by sampling random pairs of noise and target points (x0,x1) and ensuring that the velocity field is aligned, on average, with x1-x0 when evaluated along a segment linking x0 to x1. While these pairs are sampled independently by default, they can also be selected more carefully by matching batches of n noise to n target points using an optimal transport (OT) solver. Although promising in theory, the OT flow matching (OT-FM) approach is not widely used in practice. Zhang et al. (2025) pointed out recently that OT-FM truly starts paying off when the batch size n grows significantly, which only a multi-GPU implementation of the Sinkhorn algorithm can handle. Unfortunately, the costs of running Sinkhorn can quickly balloon, requiring O(n2/varepsilon2) operations for every n pairs used to fit the velocity field, where varepsilon is a regularization parameter that should be typically small to yield better results. To fulfill the theoretical promises of OT-FM, we propose to move away from batch-OT and rely instead on a semidiscrete formulation that leverages the fact that the target dataset distribution is usually of finite size N. The SD-OT problem is solved by estimating a dual potential vector using SGD; using that vector, freshly sampled noise vectors at train time can then be matched with data points at the cost of a maximum inner product search (MIPS). Semidiscrete FM (SD-FM) removes the quadratic dependency on n/varepsilon that bottlenecks OT-FM. SD-FM beats both FM and OT-FM on all training metrics and inference budget constraints, across multiple datasets, on unconditional/conditional generation, or when using mean-flow models.

Key facts. Cited by 13 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Flow matching, time series and science, one of 14 directions in Diffusion models. Builds on 42 of its 60 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Sep 2025.

Builds on

42 of 60 references.

Closest ancestors · 11

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025Align Your Flow: Scaling Continuous-Time Flow Map Distillation17 Jun
  2. 2024Flow Matching Guide and Code9 Dec
  3. 2024Simple ReFlow: Improved Techniques for Fast Flow Models10 Oct
  4. 2024Flow map matching with stochastic interpolants: A mathematical framework for consistency models11 Jun
  5. 2024Conditional Wasserstein Distances with Applications in Bayesian OT Flow Matching27 Mar
  6. 2023InstaFlow: One Step is Enough for High-Quality Diffusion-Based Text-to-Image Generation12 Sep
  7. 2023Multisample Flow Matching: Straightening Flows with Minibatch Couplings28 Apr
  8. 2023Improving and generalizing flow-based generative models with minibatch optimal transport1 Feb
  9. 2022Flow Matching for Generative Modeling6 Oct
  10. 2022Rectified Flow: A Marginal Preserving Approach to Optimal Transport29 Sep
  11. 2022Flow Straight and Fast: Learning to Generate and Transfer Data with Rectified Flow7 Sep

Other references · 31

  1. 2022Classifier-Free Diffusion Guidancecited by 5,847
  2. 2024Scaling Rectified Flow Transformers for High-Resolution Image Synthesiscited by 4,181
  3. 2018Neural Ordinary Differential Equationscited by 3,779
  4. 2014Deep Learning Face Attributes in the Wildcited by 3,693
  5. 2015Variational Inference with Normalizing Flowscited by 2,170
  6. 2023Consistency Modelscited by 1,822
  7. 2018Glow: Generative Flow with Invertible 1x1 Convolutionscited by 1,545
  8. 2019Improved Precision and Recall Metric for Assessing Generative Modelscited by 944
  9. 2023Stochastic Interpolants: A Unifying Framework for Flows and Diffusionscited by 939
  10. 2018Computational Optimal Transportcited by 780
  11. 2024Open-Sora: Democratizing Efficient Video Production for Allcited by 652
  12. 2018FFJORD: Free-form Continuous Dynamics for Scalable Reversible Generative Modelscited by 594
19 more
  1. 2025Mean Flows for One-step Generative Modelingcited by 561
  2. 2023Improved Techniques for Training Consistency Modelscited by 439
  3. 2024Guiding a Diffusion Model with a Bad Version of Itselfcited by 299
  4. 2016Stochastic Optimization for Large-scale Optimal Transportcited by 189
  5. 2018Computational Optimal Transport: Complexity by Accelerated Gradient Descent Is Better Than by Sinkhorn's Algorithmcited by 112
  6. 2014Asymmetric LSH (ALSH) for Sublinear Time Maximum Inner Product Search (MIPS)cited by 109
  7. 2025Feynman-Kac Correctors in Diffusion: Annealing, Guidance, and Product of Expertscited by 96
  8. 2023Minimizing Trajectory Curvature of ODE-based Generative Modelscited by 89
  9. 2024Classifier-Free Guidance is a Predictor-Correctorcited by 84
  10. 2023Non-Denoising Forward-Time Diffusionscited by 77
  11. 2019On Efficient Optimal Transport: An Analysis of Greedy and Accelerated Mirror Descent Algorithmscited by 62
  12. 2024Statistical optimal transportcited by 47
  13. 2020Conditional Sampling with Monotone GANs: from Generative Models to Likelihood-Free Inferencecited by 42
  14. 2018Semi-dual Regularized Optimal Transportcited by 26
  15. 2023Conditional Optimal Transport on Function Spacescited by 26
  16. 2024Dynamic Conditional Optimal Transport through Simulation-Free Flowscited by 25
  17. 2024PetFace: A Large-Scale Dataset and Benchmark for Animal Identificationcited by 16
  18. 2016Convergence of a Newton algorithm for semi-discrete optimal transportcited by 13
  19. 2025On Fitting Flow Models with Large Sinkhorn Couplingscited by 11

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 4; 2026: 9.

13 papers.

Sort:

By area:

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025OAT-FM: Optimal Acceleration Transport for Improved Flow Matching
  2. 2024Consistency Flow Matching: Defining Straight Flows with Velocity Consistency
  3. 2025Beyond Optimal Transport: Model-Aligned Coupling for Flow Matching
  4. 2026Same Flow, Different Paths: Variance Reduction in Flow Matching
  5. 2026Multimarginal flow matching with optimal transport potentials
  6. 2026Expected Batch Optimal Transport Plans and Consequences for Flow Matching
  7. 2024Optimal Flow Matching: Learning Straight Trajectories in Just One Step
  8. 2026FlowBudget: Training-Free Sampling-Budget Estimation for Flow Matching Models