mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Gromov-Monge Flow Matching for Equivariant Graph Generation

arXiv 2608.26961 ↗First posted 27 Aug 2026cs.LG math.OC stat.MLcited by 0

On the map: Diffusion models → Flow matching, time series and science

Abstract (arXiv)

Graphs are invariant under node permutations, motivating permutation-equivariant architectures in generative models. In flow matching, however, symmetry also affects the source-target coupling: one must choose both which graphs to pair and which node representatives to align. We study these two forms of alignment, termed outer and inner alignment, and their effect on equivariant graph flow matching. We connect inner alignment to transport on the graph quotient space, whose Euclidean quotient metric coincides with Gromov-Monge distance, and show that quotient couplings admit aligned representative lifts while symmetrization yields equivariant flow-matching minimizers, including for categorical endpoints. In practice, we compare random augmentation, permutation-blind minibatch optimal transport, approximate Gromov-Wasserstein alignment, and combinations of inner and outer alignment. Across continuous graph and molecular generation, alignment can substantially simplify trajectories and improve few-step generation, while its benefits depend on the alignment and computational budget. Our results highlight that effective graph flow matching benefits from alignment both inside and across graph pairs.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Flow matching, time series and science, one of 14 directions in Diffusion models. Builds on 42 of its 57 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Aug 2026.

Builds on

42 of 57 references.

Closest ancestors · 20

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2026Generalized Wasserstein Flow Matching: Transport Plans, Everywhere, All at Once8 May
  2. 2026Flowette: Flow Matching with Graphette Priors for Graph Generation27 Feb
  3. 2026Categorical Flow Maps12 Feb
  4. 2026Variational Bayesian Flow Network for Graph Generation30 Jan
  5. 2025Flow Matching with Semidiscrete Couplings29 Sep
  6. 2025Bures-Wasserstein Flow Matching for Graph Generation16 Jun
  7. 2025Flow Matching: Markov Kernels, Stochastic Processes and Transport Plans28 Jan
  8. 2024Wasserstein Flow Matching: Generative modeling over families of distributions1 Nov
  9. 2024DeFoG: Discrete Flow Matching for Graph Generation5 Oct
  10. 2024Variational Flow Matching for Graph Generation7 Jun
  11. 2024Conditional Wasserstein Distances with Applications in Bayesian OT Flow Matching27 Mar
  12. 2023Equivariant flow matching26 Jun
8 more
  1. 2023Multisample Flow Matching: Straightening Flows with Minibatch Couplings28 Apr
  2. 2023Flow Matching on General Geometries7 Feb
  3. 2023Improving and generalizing flow-based generative models with minibatch optimal transport1 Feb
  4. 2022Flow Matching for Generative Modeling6 Oct
  5. 2022DiGress: Discrete Denoising diffusion for graph generation29 Sep
  6. 2022Flow Straight and Fast: Learning to Generate and Transfer Data with Rectified Flow7 Sep
  7. 2022Equivariant Diffusion for Molecule Generation in 3D31 Mar
  8. 2022Score-based Generative Modeling of Graphs via the System of Stochastic Differential Equations5 Feb

Other references · 22

  1. 2022Building Normalizing Flows with Stochastic Interpolantscited by 995
  2. 2018Junction Tree Variational Autoencoder for Molecular Graph Generationcited by 652
  3. 2025Mean Flows for One-step Generative Modelingcited by 561
  4. 2019PointFlow: 3D Point Cloud Generation with Continuous Normalizing Flowscited by 488
  5. 2018GraphRNN: Generating Realistic Graphs with Deep Auto-regressive Modelscited by 413
  6. 2022Analog Bits: Generating Discrete Data using Diffusion Models with Self-Conditioningcited by 373
  7. 2020GraphAF: a Flow-based Autoregressive Model for Molecular Graph Generationcited by 305
  8. 2020Equivariant Flows: Exact Likelihood Generative Learning for Symmetric Densitiescited by 250
  9. 2020MoFlow: An Invertible Flow Model for Generating Molecular Graphscited by 185
  10. 2019Gromov-Wasserstein Learning for Graph Matching and Node Embeddingcited by 126
  11. 2018Fused Gromov-Wasserstein distance for structured objects: theoretical foundations and mathematical propertiescited by 93
  12. 2026Flow Map Language Models: One-step Language Modeling via Continuous Denoisingcited by 66
10 more
  1. 2021Linear-Time Gromov Wasserstein Distances using Low Rank Couplings and Costscited by 61
  2. 2021Quantized Gromov-Wassersteincited by 19
  3. 2021On a linear Gromov-Wasserstein distancecited by 17
  4. 2025Not-So-Optimal Transport Flows for 3D Point Cloud Generationcited by 17
  5. 2024The Z-Gromov-Wasserstein Distancecited by 12
  6. 2025A Novel Sliced Fused Gromov-Wasserstein Distancecited by 9
  7. 2025AlignFlow: Improving Flow-based Generative Models with Semi-Discrete Optimal Transportcited by 7
  8. 2026Spherical Flows for Sampling Categorical Datacited by 6
  9. 2025Slicing Wasserstein Over Wasserstein Via Functional Optimal Transportcited by 5
  10. 2022Orthogonal Gromov-Wasserstein Discrepancy with Efficient Lower Boundcited by 3

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Balancing Symmetry and Efficiency in Graph Flow Matching
  2. 2026Permutation-Equivariant Flow Matching for Alignment-Free Neural Weight Generation
  3. 2026Prior-Informed Flow Matching for Graph Reconstruction
  4. 2026Feasible Flow Matching for Graph Reconstruction via Within-Sampling Primal-Dual Guidance
  5. 2026Equivariant Efficient Joint Discrete and Continuous MeanFlow for Molecular Graph Generation
  6. 2024Equivariant Denoisers Cannot Copy Graphs: Align Your Graph Diffusion Models
  7. 2026Beyond Straightness: Non-Crossing Flow Matching via Quantile AlignTree Coupling
  8. 2026Equivariant Latent Alignment via Flow Matching under Group Symmetries