Same Flow, Different Paths: Variance Reduction in Flow Matching
On the map: Diffusion models → Flow matching, time series and science
Abstract (arXiv)
In flow matching (FM), a velocity model vθ is trained using a predefined path gt that connects data and noise samples (e.g., gt(x0, x1) = (1 - t) x0 + t x1). In this work, we study the choice of this path from an optimization perspective by analyzing the variance of stochastic gradients. We consider the class G(pt,v^start) of paths that induce the same marginal distributions pt and marginal velocity field v^start, and therefore the same FM objective. Our main finding is that the choice of path gt can fundamentally change the convergence rate of SGD, even when the FM objective remains exactly the same. (i) For a linear velocity model and one-dimensional Gaussian data, we derive a tight bound on the SGD iteration complexity up to logarithmic factors and find an analytically optimal path that minimizes this bound among linear paths inducing the same FM problem. (ii) We then extend the variance analysis to general FM problems and formulate path selection at a fixed θ as the variance-minimization problem PathOptθ, constrained to gt∈ G(pt,v^start). We show that this constraint is essential: reducing variance without it can lead to slower convergence. (iii) Since the constraint gt ∈ G(pt,v^start) cannot generally be verified directly, we derive an equivalent formulation with constraints that can be estimated from samples, allowing paths to be found numerically. Our theoretical results are supported by experiments with Gaussian data, Gaussian mixture models, and real datasets.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Flow matching, time series and science, one of 14 directions in Diffusion models. Builds on 21 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Sep 2026.
Builds on
21 of 31 references.
Closest ancestors · 6
Same direction, newest first
- 2026Preconditioned Flow Matching2 Mar
- 2026Stable Velocity: A Variance Perspective on Flow Matching5 Feb
- 2026Temporal Pair Consistency for Variance-Reduced Flow Matching4 Feb
- 2023Multisample Flow Matching: Straightening Flows with Minibatch Couplings28 Apr
- 2023Improving and generalizing flow-based generative models with minibatch optimal transport1 Feb
- 2022Flow Matching for Generative Modeling6 Oct
Other references · 15
- 2020Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Modelscited by 21,076
- 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
- 2021High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Diffusion Modelscited by 18,863
- 2024Scaling Rectified Flow Transformers for High-Resolution Image Synthesiscited by 4,181
- 2019Generative Modeling by Estimating Gradients of the Data Distributioncited by 4,101
- 2025Wan: Open and Advanced Large-Scale Video Generative Modelscited by 2,708
- 2019StarGAN v2: Diverse Image Synthesis for Multiple Domainscited by 1,098
- 2025Qwen-Image Technical Reportcited by 1,044
- 2019Improved Precision and Recall Metric for Assessing Generative Modelscited by 944
- 2024WorldSimBench: Towards Video Generation Models as World Simulatorscited by 881
- 2019Lower Bounds for Non-Convex Stochastic Optimizationcited by 307
- 2025The Principles of Diffusion Modelscited by 76
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Flow Matching under Noisy Latent Structure: Beyond Exact Low-Dimensional Support
- 2025On Flow Matching KL Divergence
- 2024Consistency Flow Matching: Defining Straight Flows with Velocity Consistency
- 2026Gaussian Flow-Matching Schedules: Implications for Sampling and Training
- 2024Stream-level flow matching with Gaussian processes
- 2026Guidance Without Labels: Flow Matching from Coupled Gaussian Mixtures
- 2026Co-Evolving Paths and Flows via Path-Flow Alignment
- 2025Score-Regularized Joint Sampling with Importance Weights for Flow Matching