mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

On Fitting Flow Models with Large Sinkhorn Couplings

arXiv 2506.05526 ↗First posted 5 Jun 2025cs.LG stat.MLcited by 11

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Flow models transform data gradually from one modality (e.g. noise) onto another (e.g. images). Such models are parameterized by a time-dependent velocity field, trained to fit segments connecting pairs of source and target points. When the pairing between source and target points is given, training flow models boils down to a supervised regression problem. When no such pairing exists, as is the case when generating data from noise, training flows is much harder. A popular approach lies in picking source and target points independently. This can, however, lead to velocity fields that are slow to train, but also costly to integrate at inference time. In theory, one would greatly benefit from training flow models by sampling pairs from an optimal transport (OT) measure coupling source and target, since this would lead to a highly efficient flow solving the Benamou and Brenier dynamical OT problem. In practice, recent works have proposed to sample mini-batches of n source and n target points and reorder them using an OT solver to form better pairs. These works have advocated using batches of size n≈ 256, and considered OT solvers that return couplings that are either sharp (using e.g. the Hungarian algorithm) or blurred (using e.g. entropic regularization, a.k.a. Sinkhorn). We follow in the footsteps of these works by exploring the benefits of increasing n by three to four orders of magnitude, and look more carefully on the effect of the entropic regularization varepsilon used in the Sinkhorn algorithm. Our analysis is facilitated by new scale invariant quantities to report the sharpness of a coupling, while our sharded computations across multiple GPU or GPU nodes allow scaling up n. We show that in both synthetic and image generation tasks, flow models greatly benefit when fitted with large Sinkhorn couplings, with a low entropic regularization varepsilon.

Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 28 of its 49 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Jun 2025.

Builds on

28 of 49 references.

References · 28

  1. 2022Flow Matching for Generative Modelingcited by 5,702
  2. 2018Neural Ordinary Differential Equationscited by 3,779
  3. 2022Flow Straight and Fast: Learning to Generate and Transfer Data with Rectified Flowcited by 3,700
  4. 2013Sinkhorn Distances: Lightspeed Computation of Optimal Transportation Distancescited by 2,316
  5. 2015Variational Inference with Normalizing Flowscited by 2,170
  6. 2022Building Normalizing Flows with Stochastic Interpolantscited by 995
  7. 2023Improving and generalizing flow-based generative models with minibatch optimal transportcited by 879
  8. 2018Computational Optimal Transportcited by 780
  9. 2018FFJORD: Free-form Continuous Dynamics for Scalable Reversible Generative Modelscited by 594
  10. 2016Input Convex Neural Networkscited by 414
  11. 2017A Downsampled Variant of ImageNet as an Alternative to the CIFAR datasetscited by 377
  12. 2024Flow Matching Guide and Codecited by 301
16 more
  1. 2022Rectified Flow: A Marginal Preserving Approach to Optimal Transportcited by 283
  2. 2023Multisample Flow Matching: Straightening Flows with Minibatch Couplingscited by 278
  3. 2022On Neural Differential Equationscited by 268
  4. 2023Equivariant flow matchingcited by 135
  5. 2022Optimal Transport Tools (OTT): A JAX Toolbox for all things Wassersteincited by 101
  6. 2022Action Matching: Learning Stochastic Dynamics from Samplescited by 98
  7. 2021Do Neural Optimal Transport Solvers Work? A Continuous Wasserstein-2 Benchmarkcited by 96
  8. 2023Minimizing Trajectory Curvature of ODE-based Generative Modelscited by 89
  9. 2019Learning with minibatch Wasserstein : asymptotic and gradient propertiescited by 87
  10. 2019Statistical bounds for entropic optimal transport: sample complexity and the central limit theoremcited by 85
  11. 2023Non-Denoising Forward-Time Diffusionscited by 77
  12. 2024Statistical optimal transportcited by 47
  13. 2024Simple ReFlow: Improved Techniques for Fast Flow Modelscited by 34
  14. 2020A note on overrelaxation in the Sinkhorn algorithmcited by 7
  15. 2024Modeling Stochastic Conditional Dynamics from Sparse Observations via Kernel-Stabilized Flow Matchingcited by 3
  16. 2024EquiFlow: Equivariant Conditional Flow Matching with Optimal Transport for 3D Molecular Conformation Predictioncited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 6; 2026: 5.

11 papers.