mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Anchored Supervised Fine-Tuning

arXiv 2509.23753 ↗First posted 28 Sep 2025cs.LG cs.CLcited by 15

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Post-training of large language models involves a fundamental trade-off between supervised fine-tuning (SFT), which efficiently mimics demonstrations but tends to memorize, and reinforcement learning (RL), which achieves better generalization at higher computational cost. Dynamic Fine-Tuning (DFT) recently emerged as a promising middle ground, reweighting SFT objectives with token probabilities and achieving improvements in certain reasoning domains, though it exhibits instability in other tasks. We provide a analysis of DFT through the reward-weighted regression (RWR) framework, revealing that it corresponds to a specific auxiliary distribution choice that yields provably tighter RL bounds than standard SFT. However, our analysis also uncovers a critical limitation: this construction lacks distributional anchoring, leading to progressive drift that undermines training stability. To address this, we propose Anchored Supervised Fine-Tuning (ASFT), which augments DFT's reweighting with lightweight KL regularization to preserve tightness while ensuring stability. Empirically, ASFT consistently outperforms both SFT and DFT across mathematical reasoning, medical knowledge grounding, and code generation, achieving substantial improvements with minimal computational overhead. Our RWR framework provides a systematic lens for understanding post-training methods and demonstrates that principled theoretical analysis leads to both stronger guarantees and practical gains. The code is available at https://github.com/zhuchichi56/ASFT.

Key facts. Cited by 15 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 32 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Sep 2025.

Builds on

32 of 41 references.

References · 32

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  2. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
  3. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
  4. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 15,215
  5. 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,380
  6. 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 13,028
  7. 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 9,379
  8. 2021Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Codecited by 8,320
  9. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 8,065
  10. 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,963
  11. 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,371
  12. 2021Finetuned Language Models Are Zero-Shot Learnerscited by 3,780
20 more
  1. 2022Training a Helpful and Harmless Assistant with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 3,720
  2. 2021Program Synthesis with Large Language Modelscited by 3,637
  3. 2022Scaling Instruction-Finetuned Language Modelscited by 3,024
  4. 2020Learning to summarize from human feedbackcited by 2,588
  5. 2015Trust Region Policy Optimizationcited by 2,580
  6. 2019Fine-Tuning Language Models from Human Preferencescited by 2,150
  7. 2024HybridFlow: A Flexible and Efficient RLHF Frameworkcited by 2,057
  8. 2022Solving Quantitative Reasoning Problems with Language Modelscited by 1,392
  9. 2023Is Your Code Generated by ChatGPT Really Correct? Rigorous Evaluation of Large Language Models for Code Generationcited by 1,391
  10. 2020What Disease does this Patient Have? A Large-scale Open Domain Question Answering Dataset from Medical Examscited by 1,356
  11. 2024Self-Rewarding Language Modelscited by 681
  12. 2025SFT Memorizes, RL Generalizes: A Comparative Study of Foundation Model Post-trainingcited by 672
  13. 2022MedMCQA : A Large-scale Multi-Subject Multi-Choice Dataset for Medical domain Question Answeringcited by 543
  14. 2019Does Learning Require Memorization? A Short Tale about a Long Tailcited by 460
  15. 2015Doubly Robust Off-policy Value Evaluation for Reinforcement Learningcited by 339
  16. 2023Magicoder: Empowering Code Generation with OSS-Instructcited by 256
  17. 2025On the Generalization of SFT: A Reinforcement Learning Perspective with Reward Rectificationcited by 127
  18. 2018Policy Optimization via Importance Samplingcited by 47
  19. 2025Supervised Fine Tuning on Curated Data is Reinforcement Learning (and can be improved)cited by 38
  20. 2025Towards a Unified View of Large Language Model Post-Trainingcited by 36

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 14.

15 papers.

Sort:

By area:

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025SRFT: A Single-Stage Method with Supervised and Reinforcement Fine-Tuning for Reasoning
  2. 2025UFT: Unifying Supervised and Reinforcement Fine-Tuning
  3. 2026Supervised Fine-Tuning versus Reinforcement Learning: A Study of Post-Training Methods for Large Language Models
  4. 2025Enhancing Large Language Model Reasoning via Selective Critical Token Fine-Tuning
  5. 2026Compatibility-Aware Dynamic Fine-Tuning for Large Language Models
  6. 2025Scalpel vs. Hammer: GRPO Amplifies Existing Capabilities, SFT Replaces Them
  7. 2026On the Non-decoupling of Supervised Fine-tuning and Reinforcement Learning in Post-training
  8. 2025Mitigating Forgetting Between Supervised and Reinforcement Learning Yields Stronger Reasoners