mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

PG-SFT: Balancing Capability Acquisition and Retention in Offline Agent Fine-Tuning

arXiv 2610.00949 ↗First posted 1 Oct 2026cs.AIcited by 0

New in LLM agents and tool use; no direction yet. LLM agents and tool use

Abstract (arXiv)

Supervised fine-tuning (SFT) on offline agent trajectories is the standard approach for training specialized tool-using agents, but forcing models to imitate reasoning and actions token by token may harm other capabilities (e.g., general reasoning, tool calling, code generation) of the base model. In this work, we focus on studying how to better balance the trade-off between acquiring new capabilities and preserving existing ones during agent trace SFT. By comparing several baselines in our setup, standard SFT improves the target benchmark while lowering several non-target benchmark scores; meanwhile, simply constraining distributional drift using KL penalty or limiting the update magnitude did not avoid this regression trend. Motivated by recent token-wise adaptive learning objectives, this work proposes Privilege-Guided SFT (PG-SFT) to leverage turn-level information gain of agent trajectories as an indicator to adjust supervision strength. PG-SFT yields a more favorable observed trade-off on the evaluated benchmarks, substantially reducing distributional drift and broad capability degradation at the cost of slight degradation in target-task performance. Our findings suggest that balancing the acquisition--retention trade-off depends not only on whether the model is anchored to its base behavior, but also on where and how strongly supervision should depart from that behavior.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 49 of its 56 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Oct 2026.

Builds on

49 of 56 references.

References · 49

  1. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
  2. 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 12,865
  3. 2015Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Networkcited by 10,076
  4. 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,355
  5. 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,195
  6. 2021Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Codecited by 8,053
  7. 2016Overcoming catastrophic forgetting in neural networkscited by 4,718
  8. 2023SWE-bench: Can Language Models Resolve Real-World GitHub Issues?cited by 3,193
  9. 2023GPQA: A Graduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A Benchmarkcited by 2,748
  10. 2016Learning without Forgettingcited by 2,465
  11. 2024LiveCodeBench: Holistic and Contamination Free Evaluation of Large Language Models for Codecited by 1,906
  12. 2023Fine-tuning Aligned Language Models Compromises Safety, Even When Users Do Not Intend To!cited by 1,106
37 more
  1. 2024OpenHands: An Open Platform for AI Software Developers as Generalist Agentscited by 956
  2. 2023On-Policy Distillation of Language Models: Learning from Self-Generated Mistakescited by 840
  3. 2023An Empirical Study of Catastrophic Forgetting in Large Language Models During Continual Fine-tuningcited by 622
  4. 2026Self-Distilled Reasoner: On-Policy Self-Distillation for Large Language Modelscited by 386
  5. 2017Measuring Catastrophic Forgetting in Neural Networkscited by 359
  6. 2023What Makes Good Data for Alignment? A Comprehensive Study of Automatic Data Selection in Instruction Tuningcited by 354
  7. 2023AgentTuning: Enabling Generalized Agent Abilities for LLMscited by 319
  8. 2024LoRA Learns Less and Forgets Lesscited by 313
  9. 2023From Quantity to Quality: Boosting LLM Performance with Self-Guided Data Selection for Instruction Tuningcited by 301
  10. 2018Explicit Inductive Bias for Transfer Learning with Convolutional Networkscited by 226
  11. 2015Unifying distillation and privileged informationcited by 218
  12. 2025RL's Razor: Why Online Reinforcement Learning Forgets Lesscited by 162
  13. 2022Learning by Distilling Contextcited by 128
  14. 2025On the Generalization of SFT: A Reinforcement Learning Perspective with Reward Rectificationcited by 121
  15. 2025Small Models Struggle to Learn from Strong Reasonerscited by 109
  16. 2025Does Math Reasoning Improve General LLM Capabilities? Understanding Transferability of LLM Reasoningcited by 101
  17. 2024Agent-FLAN: Designing Data and Methods of Effective Agent Tuning for Large Language Modelscited by 97
  18. 2024Self-Distillation Bridges Distribution Gap in Language Model Fine-Tuningcited by 90
  19. 2026Privileged Information Distillation for Language Modelscited by 79
  20. 2024Selective Reflection-Tuning: Student-Selected Data Recycling for LLM Instruction-Tuningcited by 57
  21. 2025The Best Instruction-Tuning Data are Those That Fitcited by 48
  22. 2022Two-stage LLM Fine-tuning with Less Specialization and More Generalizationcited by 39
  23. 2024SelectIT: Selective Instruction Tuning for LLMs via Uncertainty-Aware Self-Reflectioncited by 34
  24. 2026Rethinking On-Policy Self-Distillation for Thinking Modelscited by 28
  25. 2025SFT Doesn't Always Hurt General Capabilities: Revisiting Domain-Specific Fine-Tuning in LLMscited by 23
  26. 2024Rethinking Data Selection at Scale: Random Selection is Almost All You Needcited by 22
  27. 2022Toward Understanding Privileged Features Distillation in Learning-to-Rankcited by 16
  28. 2026Privileged, but Biased: How PI-Conditioned Teachers Break Self-Distillationcited by 12
  29. 2025Anchored Supervised Fine-Tuningcited by 11
  30. 2026Towards On-Policy SFT: Distribution Discriminant Theory and its Applications in LLM Trainingcited by 8
  31. 2026Is More Privileged Information Better? From Solution Traces to Problem-Solving Structure in Self-Distilled Reasoningcited by 7
  32. 2026Rethinking Privileged Information in On-Policy Self-Distillationcited by 6
  33. 2026InfoSFT: Learn More and Forget Less with Information-Aware Token Weightingcited by 3
  34. 2026Compatibility-Aware Dynamic Fine-Tuning for Large Language Modelscited by 3
  35. 2026MemSFT: Mitigating Alignment Tax with an External Parametric Memorycited by 2
  36. 2026Mask the Target: A Plug-and-Play Regularizer Against LoRA Forgettingcited by 1
  37. 2026Capacity-Dependent Effects of Data Selection for Reasoningcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026SFT or RL for Tool-Calling Agents? A Controlled Study Across Data, Method, and Scale
  2. 2025Klear-AgentForge: Forging Agentic Intelligence through Posttraining Scaling
  3. 2026Can Agents Generalize to the Open World? Unveiling the Fragility of Static Training in Tool Use
  4. 2026Dependency-Aware Trajectory Refinement for Efficient Multi-Turn Agent Fine-Tuning
  5. 2025Don't Just Fine-tune the Agent, Tune the Environment
  6. 2025Exploring Expert Failures Improves LLM Agent Tuning
  7. 2026From Patches to Trajectories: Privileged Process Supervision for Software-Engineering Agents
  8. 2026RASFT: Rollout-Adaptive Supervised Fine-Tuning for Reasoning