mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

PriFT: Prior-Support Guided Supervised Fine-Tuning

arXiv 2606.09396 ↗First posted 8 Jun 2026cs.CL cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Supervised fine-tuning (SFT) is an efficient approach for downstream task adaptation and often serves as the initialization stage for reinforcement learning (RL), but it can show weaker generalization than RL. A key limitation is its off-policy objective: SFT fits fixed demonstrations token by token, including targets poorly aligned with the model's pretrained distribution, which can lead to overfitting. A recent line of work addresses this issue by assigning larger training weights to tokens better aligned with the current model's predictive distribution, with the intuition that fitting these tokens are less distortive to the model's pretrained knowledge and representations. However, computing the token weights from the model that is currently fine-tuned entangles token weights with the optimization trajectory, inducing a self-reinforcing dynamics as the distribution rapidly departs from the pretrained model. To address this, we propose PriFT (Prior-support guided Fine-Tuning), which derives token weights from a frozen pretrained reference to obtain a stable reweighting signal unaffected by fine-tuning. This signal estimates prior support: the extent to which each target token is supported by the pretrained distribution. Across multiple existing token-reweighting rules, replacing the reweighting signal from the online model to pretrained model consistently improves performance. We introduce two instantiations: PriFT-prob uses pretrained token probability, while PriFT-mass selects tokens by cumulative probability mass under the pretrained distribution. Extensive experiments on mathematical reasoning, code generation, and medical question answering show that PriFT achieves state-of-the-art results among SFT baselines and provides a better initialization for subsequent RL training.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 43 of its 47 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Jun 2026.

Builds on

43 of 47 references.

References · 43

  1. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
  2. 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 12,865
  3. 2015Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Networkcited by 10,076
  4. 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 9,743
  5. 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 8,851
  6. 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,195
  7. 2021Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Codecited by 8,053
  8. 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,768
  9. 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,203
  10. 2021Program Synthesis with Large Language Modelscited by 3,509
  11. 2025DAPO: An Open-Source LLM Reinforcement Learning System at Scalecited by 2,678
  12. 2024LiveCodeBench: Holistic and Contamination Free Evaluation of Large Language Models for Codecited by 1,906
31 more
  1. 2022Solving Quantitative Reasoning Problems with Language Modelscited by 1,359
  2. 2023Is Your Code Generated by ChatGPT Really Correct? Rigorous Evaluation of Large Language Models for Code Generationcited by 1,332
  3. 2020What Disease does this Patient Have? A Large-scale Open Domain Question Answering Dataset from Medical Examscited by 1,324
  4. 2024Qwen2.5-Coder Technical Reportcited by 1,151
  5. 2024OlympiadBench: A Challenging Benchmark for Promoting AGI with Olympiad-Level Bilingual Multimodal Scientific Problemscited by 1,099
  6. 2024Tulu 3: Pushing Frontiers in Open Language Model Post-Trainingcited by 988
  7. 2021CodeT5: Identifier-aware Unified Pre-trained Encoder-Decoder Models for Code Understanding and Generationcited by 890
  8. 2023On-Policy Distillation of Language Models: Learning from Self-Generated Mistakescited by 840
  9. 2021Robust fine-tuning of zero-shot modelscited by 785
  10. 2022Fine-Tuning can Distort Pretrained Features and Underperform Out-of-Distributioncited by 722
  11. 2025SFT Memorizes, RL Generalizes: A Comparative Study of Foundation Model Post-trainingcited by 655
  12. 2022MedMCQA : A Large-scale Multi-Subject Multi-Choice Dataset for Medical domain Question Answeringcited by 525
  13. 2026Self-Distilled Reasoner: On-Policy Self-Distillation for Large Language Modelscited by 386
  14. 2026Self-Distillation Enables Continual Learningcited by 212
  15. 2025RL's Razor: Why Online Reinforcement Learning Forgets Lesscited by 162
  16. 2024DistiLLM: Towards Streamlined Distillation for Large Language Modelscited by 145
  17. 2025LLM Post-Training: A Deep Dive into Reasoning Large Language Modelscited by 129
  18. 2025On the Generalization of SFT: A Reinforcement Learning Perspective with Reward Rectificationcited by 121
  19. 2024Speculative Knowledge Distillation: Bridging the Teacher-Student Gap Through Interleaved Samplingcited by 85
  20. 2025DistiLLM-2: A Contrastive Approach Boosts the Distillation of LLMscited by 73
  21. 2024Preserving Diversity in Supervised Fine-Tuning of Large Language Modelscited by 68
  22. 2024LiNeS: Post-training Layer Scaling Prevents Forgetting and Enhances Model Mergingcited by 39
  23. 2025Supervised Fine Tuning on Curated Data is Reinforcement Learning (and can be improved)cited by 37
  24. 2025SFT Doesn't Always Hurt General Capabilities: Revisiting Domain-Specific Fine-Tuning in LLMscited by 23
  25. 2026ProFit: Leveraging High-Value Signals in SFT via Probability-Guided Token Selectioncited by 16
  26. 2026Entropy-Adaptive Fine-Tuning: Resolving Confident Conflicts to Mitigate Forgettingcited by 14
  27. 2025Anchored Supervised Fine-Tuningcited by 11
  28. 2026Good SFT Optimizes for SFT, Better SFT Prepares for Reinforcement Learningcited by 10
  29. 2026Probability-Entropy Calibration: An Elastic Indicator for Adaptive Fine-tuningcited by 9
  30. 2026Towards On-Policy SFT: Distribution Discriminant Theory and its Applications in LLM Trainingcited by 8
  31. 2026SODA: Semi On-Policy Black-Box Distillation for Large Language Modelscited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Blending Supervised and Reinforcement Fine-Tuning with Prefix Sampling
  2. 2025SRFT: A Single-Stage Method with Supervised and Reinforcement Fine-Tuning for Reasoning
  3. 2026Online Self-Weighted Fine-Tuning
  4. 2025Mitigating Forgetting Between Supervised and Reinforcement Learning Yields Stronger Reasoners
  5. 2026Rethinking Token Reweighting for SFT: Suppress, Reverse, and Extrapolate Learned Features
  6. 2025Debunk the Myth of SFT Generalization
  7. 2025Why Reinforcement Fine-Tuning Enables MLLMs Preserve Prior Knowledge Better: A Data Perspective
  8. 2025Beyond Imitation: Recovering Dense Rewards from Demonstrations