mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Enhancing Large Language Model Reasoning via Selective Critical Token Fine-Tuning

arXiv 2510.10974 ↗First posted 13 Oct 2025cs.CLcited by 20

On the map: LLM reasoning → Test-time compute and efficient thinking

Abstract (arXiv)

Large language models (LLMs) primarily rely on supervised fine-tuning (SFT) as a key method to adapt pre-trained models to domain-specific tasks such as mathematical reasoning. However, standard SFT uniformly penalizes all tokens, neglecting that only a small subset of critical tokens determines reasoning correctness. This uniform supervision often causes reduced output diversity and limited generalization. We propose Critical Token Fine-tuning (CFT), a simple yet effective approach that updates only tokens identified as functionally indispensable via counterfactual perturbations. By focusing gradient signals on these decisive reasoning steps while preserving the diversity of non-critical tokens, CFT can enhance both generation and diversity. Extensive experiments on five models across three families (Qwen, OLMo, LLaMA) and eleven mathematical reasoning benchmarks show that CFT, despite fine-tuning on less than 12% of tokens, consistently outperforms standard SFT. Moreover, CFT enables test-time scaling through improved sampling diversity and provides a stronger initialization for reinforcement learning, sustaining performance gains in later training stages while maintaining higher entropy for better exploration. These results highlight CFT as a practical and general framework for efficient and robust LLM fine-tuning.

Key facts. Cited by 20 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Test-time compute and efficient thinking, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 12 of its 50 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Oct 2025.

Builds on

12 of 50 references.

References · 12

  1. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
  2. 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 10,109
  3. 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,820
  4. 2021Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Codecited by 8,320
  5. 2025DAPO: An Open-Source LLM Reinforcement Learning System at Scalecited by 2,810
  6. 2025Beyond the 80/20 Rule: High-Entropy Minority Tokens Drive Effective Reinforcement Learning for LLM Reasoningcited by 559
  7. 20242 OLMo 2 Furiouscited by 340
  8. 2025DeepMath-103K: A Large-Scale, Challenging, Decontaminated, and Verifiable Mathematical Dataset for Advancing Reasoningcited by 280
  9. 2023Evaluating the Performance of Large Language Models on GAOKAO Benchmarkcited by 186
  10. 2024MathScale: Scaling Instruction Tuning for Mathematical Reasoningcited by 144
  11. 2025On the Generalization of SFT: A Reinforcement Learning Perspective with Reward Rectificationcited by 127
  12. 2025Unveiling Over-Memorization in Finetuning LLMs for Reasoning Taskscited by 11

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 19.

20 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2026Outcome-Grounded Advantage Reshaping for Fine-Grained Credit Assignment in Mathematical Reasoningcited by 19
  2. 2026ProFit: Leveraging High-Value Signals in SFT via Probability-Guided Token Selectioncited by 18
  3. 2026Dynamics Within Latent Chain-of-Thought: An Empirical Study of Causal Structurecited by 11
  4. 2026SPPO: Sequence-Level PPO for Long-Horizon Reasoning Taskscited by 9
  5. 2026RelayLLM: Efficient Reasoning via Collaborative Decodingcited by 8
  6. 2026SED-SFT: Selectively Encouraging Diversity in Supervised Fine-Tuningcited by 7
  7. 2026Beyond Uniform Credit: Causal Credit Assignment for Policy Optimizationcited by 7
  8. 2026Decoupling Skeleton and Flesh: Efficient Multimodal Table Reasoning with Disentangled Alignment and Structure-aware Guidancecited by 3
  9. 2026Gradients Must Earn Their Influence: Unifying SFT with Generalized Entropic Objectivescited by 3
  10. 2026GIFT: Reconciling Post-Training Objectives via Variational Finite-Temperature Gibbs Initializationcited by 2
  11. 2026SAT: Balancing Reasoning Accuracy and Efficiency with Stepwise Adaptive Thinkingcited by 2
  12. 2025TS-PEFT: Unveiling Token-Level Redundancy in Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuningcited by 1
8 more
  1. 2026GIFT: Guided Fine-Tuning and Transfer for Enhancing Instruction-Tuned Language Modelscited by 1
  2. 2026Re-feeding Is Not Replaying: Measuring Replay Noise in Counterfactual Token-Credit Estimationcited by 1
  3. 2026Beyond Entropy: Learning from Token-Level Distributional Deviations for LLM Reasoningcited by 1
  4. 2026Supervised Fine-Tuning Needs to Unlock the Potential of Token Prioritycited by 0
  5. 2026A Unifying Lens on Supervised Fine-Tuning Through Target Distribution Designcited by 0
  6. 2026Which Tokens Should SFT Actually Learn? A Token-Trimming Perspective on Mathematical Reasoningcited by 0
  7. 2026Training LLM Judges from Language Feedback via Position-Selective Self-Distillationcited by 0
  8. 2026Semifactual Credit-Augmented Policy Optimizationcited by 0

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025SRFT: A Single-Stage Method with Supervised and Reinforcement Fine-Tuning for Reasoning
  2. 2024Disentangling Reasoning Tokens and Boilerplate Tokens For Language Model Fine-tuning
  3. 2025UFT: Unifying Supervised and Reinforcement Fine-Tuning
  4. 2025Making Small Language Models Efficient Reasoners: Intervention, Supervision, Reinforcement
  5. 2025Complexity-aware fine-tuning
  6. 2026Entropy-KL Divergence-based Token Masking: A Novel Approach for Selective Fine-tuning of Large Language Models
  7. 2025Reinforcement Fine-Tuning Powers Reasoning Capability of Multimodal Large Language Models
  8. 2026Supervised Fine-Tuning versus Reinforcement Learning: A Study of Post-Training Methods for Large Language Models