mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Finetuning with Sampling: SFT Learns Better Than You Think

arXiv 2610.02140 ↗First posted 1 Oct 2026cs.LG cs.AI cs.CLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Introducing new capabilities to frontier models has long been the goal of posttraining, which predominantly employs supervised finetuning (SFT) and reinforcement learning (RL) to this end. Conventional wisdom dictates that RL enables strong generalization on new tasks without losing existing capabilities, while SFT is prone to weak generalization and catastrophic forgetting. At the same time, SFT can learn from off-policy expert data, whereas RL must rely on a model's ability to find successful trajectories with repeated sampling. In our work, we seek to leverage the strength of on-policy learning while utilizing the privileged information contained in off-policy data. However, rather than modifying the learning objective to accommodate this data, we instead tailor the data distribution to better suit the learner. We introduce a Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) sampling algorithm that progressively transforms off-policy traces to be more on-policy given a reference model for finetuning. Across tasks like scientific skill acquisition, mathematical reasoning, and open-ended expertise, our sampling algorithm enables SFT to rival prevailing posttraining techniques, often generalizing better and forgetting less than strong on-policy baselines. In addition, the resulting finetuned models exhibit strong distributional performance and are capable of learning beyond sharpening the base model distribution. At a higher level, our approach presents sampling as a model-native operator that shapes data for learnability, offering broader utility as a general-purpose primitive throughout the posttraining stack.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 33 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Oct 2026.

Builds on

33 of 40 references.

References · 33

  1. 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 9,743
  2. 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,768
  3. 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,203
  4. 2016Overcoming catastrophic forgetting in neural networkscited by 4,718
  5. 2024Qwen2.5 Technical Reportcited by 4,713
  6. 2023GPQA: A Graduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A Benchmarkcited by 2,748
  7. 2022Competition-Level Code Generation with AlphaCodecited by 1,427
  8. 2025SFT Memorizes, RL Generalizes: A Comparative Study of Foundation Model Post-trainingcited by 655
  9. 2023An Empirical Study of Catastrophic Forgetting in Large Language Models During Continual Fine-tuningcited by 622
  10. 2025Open-Reasoner-Zero: An Open Source Approach to Scaling Up Reinforcement Learning on the Base Modelcited by 450
  11. 2026Self-Distilled Reasoner: On-Policy Self-Distillation for Large Language Modelscited by 386
  12. 2024HuatuoGPT-o1, Towards Medical Complex Reasoning with LLMscited by 257
21 more
  1. 2026Self-Distillation Enables Continual Learningcited by 212
  2. 2025RL's Razor: Why Online Reinforcement Learning Forgets Lesscited by 162
  3. 2026On-Policy Context Distillation for Language Modelscited by 161
  4. 2025A Minimalist Approach to LLM Reasoning: from Rejection Sampling to Reinforcecited by 141
  5. 2025On the Generalization of SFT: A Reinforcement Learning Perspective with Reward Rectificationcited by 121
  6. 2024Probabilistic Inference in Language Models via Twisted Sequential Monte Carlocited by 85
  7. 2025Reasoning with Sampling: Your Base Model is Smarter Than You Thinkcited by 84
  8. 2025Retaining by Doing: The Role of On-Policy Data in Mitigating Forgettingcited by 82
  9. 2023Sequential Monte Carlo Steering of Large Language Models using Probabilistic Programscited by 79
  10. 2025UFT: Unifying Supervised and Reinforcement Fine-Tuningcited by 58
  11. 2026POPE: Learning to Reason on Hard Problems via Privileged On-Policy Explorationcited by 39
  12. 2026Scalable Power Sampling: Unlocking Efficient, Training-Free Reasoning for LLMs via Distribution Sharpeningcited by 27
  13. 2026Power-SMC: Low-Latency Sequence-Level Power Sampling for Training-Free LLM Reasoningcited by 17
  14. 2024QUEST: Quality-Aware Metropolis-Hastings Sampling for Machine Translationcited by 16
  15. 2025Anchored Supervised Fine-Tuningcited by 11
  16. 2025Blink of an eye: a simple theory for feature localization in generative modelscited by 10
  17. 2025When does a predictor know its own loss?cited by 7
  18. 2025ReGuidance: A Simple Diffusion Wrapper for Boosting Sample Quality on Hard Inverse Problemscited by 5
  19. 2026Self-Consistency via Marginal Sharpeningcited by 3
  20. 2026Reasoning with Sampling: Cutting at Decision Pointscited by 2
  21. 2024Unrolled denoising networks provably learn optimal Bayesian inferencecited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2021Policy Finetuning: Bridging Sample-Efficient Offline and Online Reinforcement Learning
  2. 2026Towards On-Policy SFT: Distribution Discriminant Theory and its Applications in LLM Training
  3. 2023Finetuning from Offline Reinforcement Learning: Challenges, Trade-offs and Practical Solutions
  4. 2025Debunk the Myth of SFT Generalization
  5. 2025Blending Supervised and Reinforcement Fine-Tuning with Prefix Sampling
  6. 2026Good SFT Optimizes for SFT, Better SFT Prepares for Reinforcement Learning
  7. 2026TMS: Trajectory-Mixed Supervision for Reward-Free, On-Policy SFT
  8. 2026Dynamics-Predictive Sampling for Active RL Finetuning of Large Reasoning Models