When RL Fails after SFT: Rejuvenating Model Plasticity for Robust SFT-to-RL Handoff
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) followed by Reinforcement Learning (RL) has become a standard pipeline for Large Language Model (LLM) post-training. SFT is expected to provide a useful behavioral prior for RL to further enhance model capabilities. However, checkpoints with excessive SFT often show limited improvement during RL. We attribute this failure to the loss of model plasticity: the reduced ability of an SFT-initialized policy to be effectively reshaped by subsequent RL. To better understand this phenomenon, we conduct detailed analysis from multiple perspectives, including parameter changes, output spaces, and RL optimization dynamics. Our results show that models from excessive SFT tend to produce over-confident token distributions and exhibit sharp parameter landscapes, which make them harder to optimize in the RL stage. To enable a more robust SFT-to-RL handoff, we propose textttRejuvenation, a simple yet effective method that restores plasticity while preserving useful SFT-acquired priors. Rejuvenation leverages base-anchored model fusion to reduce excessive SFT-induced drift with targeted neuron reset to mitigate model rigidity. Experimental results on both math reasoning tasks and agentic tasks demonstrate that our approach consistently improves RL performance on over-trained SFT models, while also enhancing generalization to out-of-distribution tasks.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 60 of its 70 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Jun 2026.
Builds on
60 of 70 references.
References · 60
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
- 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 10,109
- 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 9,379
- 2025DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learningcited by 6,330
- 2023Efficient Memory Management for Large Language Model Serving with PagedAttentioncited by 5,944
- 2024Qwen2.5 Technical Reportcited by 4,942
- 2018Think you have Solved Question Answering? Try ARC, the AI2 Reasoning Challengecited by 4,886
- 2023Let's Verify Step by Stepcited by 3,789
- 2022Training a Helpful and Harmless Assistant with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 3,720
- 2023GPQA: A Graduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A Benchmarkcited by 2,879
38 more
- 2025DAPO: An Open-Source LLM Reinforcement Learning System at Scalecited by 2,810
- 2024HybridFlow: A Flexible and Efficient RLHF Frameworkcited by 2,057
- 2019Megatron-LM: Training Multi-Billion Parameter Language Models Using Model Parallelismcited by 1,868
- 2024MMLU-Pro: A More Robust and Challenging Multi-Task Language Understanding Benchmarkcited by 1,848
- 2024LlamaFactory: Unified Efficient Fine-Tuning of 100+ Language Modelscited by 1,464
- 2024τ-bench: A Benchmark for Tool-Agent-User Interaction in Real-World Domainscited by 1,402
- 2022Model soups: averaging weights of multiple fine-tuned models improves accuracy without increasing inference timecited by 1,396
- 2022Solving Quantitative Reasoning Problems with Language Modelscited by 1,392
- 2023SGLang: Efficient Execution of Structured Language Model Programscited by 1,141
- 2024OlympiadBench: A Challenging Benchmark for Promoting AGI with Olympiad-Level Bilingual Multimodal Scientific Problemscited by 1,136
- 2022Editing Models with Task Arithmeticcited by 1,120
- 2025Does Reinforcement Learning Really Incentivize Reasoning Capacity in LLMs Beyond the Base Model?cited by 982
- 2019Are Sixteen Heads Really Better than One?cited by 816
- 2025SFT Memorizes, RL Generalizes: A Comparative Study of Foundation Model Post-trainingcited by 672
- 2021Knowledge Neurons in Pretrained Transformerscited by 601
- 2025Beyond the 80/20 Rule: High-Entropy Minority Tokens Drive Effective Reinforcement Learning for LLM Reasoningcited by 559
- 2025The Lessons of Developing Process Reward Models in Mathematical Reasoningcited by 415
- 2025Learning to Reason under Off-Policy Guidancecited by 281
- 2025ProRL: Prolonged Reinforcement Learning Expands Reasoning Boundaries in Large Language Modelscited by 194
- 2025A Survey of Reinforcement Learning for Large Reasoning Modelscited by 180
- 2025On the Generalization of SFT: A Reinforcement Learning Perspective with Reward Rectificationcited by 127
- 2025GenPRM: Scaling Test-Time Compute of Process Reward Models via Generative Reasoningcited by 97
- 2025Learning What Reinforcement Learning Can't: Interleaved Online Fine-Tuning for Hardest Questionscited by 97
- 2025On-Policy RL Meets Off-Policy Experts: Harmonizing Supervised Fine-Tuning and Reinforcement Learning via Dynamic Weightingcited by 91
- 2025SRFT: A Single-Stage Method with Supervised and Reinforcement Fine-Tuning for Reasoningcited by 84
- 2024Preserving Diversity in Supervised Fine-Tuning of Large Language Modelscited by 70
- 2025Blending Supervised and Reinforcement Fine-Tuning with Prefix Samplingcited by 60
- 2025UFT: Unifying Supervised and Reinforcement Fine-Tuningcited by 59
- 2025Stabilizing Knowledge, Promoting Reasoning: Dual-Token Constraints for RLVRcited by 39
- 2025Supervised Fine Tuning on Curated Data is Reinforcement Learning (and can be improved)cited by 38
- 2025Towards a Unified View of Large Language Model Post-Trainingcited by 36
- 2025RL Fine-Tuning Heals OOD Forgetting in SFTcited by 31
- 2025Quagmires in SFT-RL Post-Training: When High SFT Scores Mislead and What to Use Insteadcited by 28
- 2025Step-wise Adaptive Integration of Supervised Fine-tuning and Reinforcement Learning for Task-Specific LLMscited by 25
- 2025SuperRL: Reinforcement Learning with Supervision to Boost Language Model Reasoningcited by 18
- 2026ProFit: Leveraging High-Value Signals in SFT via Probability-Guided Token Selectioncited by 18
- 2025RL Is Neither a Panacea Nor a Mirage: Understanding Supervised vs. Reinforcement Learning Fine-Tuning for LLMscited by 17
- 2025EvoLM: In Search of Lost Language Model Training Dynamicscited by 16
50 most cited of 60 All 60 (JSON)
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 4.
4 papers.
- 2026OPD Before RL: Warm-Starting Rubric-Based RL with On-Policy Distillationcited by 1
- 2026Don't Mask the Environment: Observation Supervision Changes How Agents Explore Under RLcited by 0
- 2026Understanding the Synergy between SFT, RLVR, and OPD in LLM Post-Trainingcited by 0
- 2026Selecting Diverse SFT Traces Improves Post-RL Generalizationcited by 0
- 2026OPD Before RL: Warm-Starting Rubric-Based RL with On-Policy Distillation2 Oct 2026
- 2026Selecting Diverse SFT Traces Improves Post-RL Generalization27 Sep 2026
- 2026Understanding the Synergy between SFT, RLVR, and OPD in LLM Post-Training25 Sep 2026
- 2026Don't Mask the Environment: Observation Supervision Changes How Agents Explore Under RL17 Sep 2026
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Supervised Fine-Tuning versus Reinforcement Learning: A Study of Post-Training Methods for Large Language Models
- 2026RL Excursions during Pre-Training: Re-examining Policy Optimization for LLM training
- 2025Scalpel vs. Hammer: GRPO Amplifies Existing Capabilities, SFT Replaces Them
- 2026Enough is as good as a feast: A Comprehensive Analysis of How Reinforcement Learning Mitigates Task Conflicts in LLMs
- 2025Reinforcement Learning Fine-Tunes a Sparse Subnetwork in Large Language Models
- 2026Scaling Near-Optimal SFT-RL Annotation Budget Allocation from Small to Large LLMs
- 2026On the Non-decoupling of Supervised Fine-tuning and Reinforcement Learning in Post-training
- 2026SFT or RL for Tool-Calling Agents? A Controlled Study Across Data, Method, and Scale