mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

CircuitSense: A Hierarchical MLLM Benchmark Bridging Visual Comprehension and Symbolic Reasoning in Engineering Design Process

arXiv 2509.22339 ↗First posted 26 Sep 2025cs.CVcited by 3

On the map: LLM reasoning → Multimodal reasoning

Abstract (arXiv)

Engineering design operates through hierarchical abstraction from system specifications to component implementations, requiring visual understanding coupled with mathematical reasoning at each level. While Multi-modal Large Language Models (MLLMs) excel at natural image tasks, their ability to extract mathematical models from technical diagrams remains unexplored. We present CircuitSense, a comprehensive benchmark evaluating circuit understanding across this hierarchy through 8,006+ problems spanning component-level schematics to system-level block diagrams. Our benchmark uniquely examines the complete engineering workflow: Perception, Analysis, and Design, with a particular emphasis on the critical but underexplored capability of deriving symbolic equations from visual inputs. We introduce a hierarchical synthetic generation pipeline consisting of a grid-based schematic generator and a block diagram generator with auto-derived symbolic equation labels. Comprehensive evaluation of six state-of-the-art MLLMs, including both closed-source and open-source models, reveals fundamental limitations in visual-to-mathematical reasoning. Closed-source models achieve over 85% accuracy on perception tasks involving component recognition and topology identification, yet their performance on symbolic derivation and analytical reasoning falls below 19%, exposing a critical gap between visual parsing and symbolic reasoning. Models with stronger symbolic reasoning capabilities consistently achieve higher design task accuracy, confirming the fundamental role of mathematical understanding in circuit synthesis and establishing symbolic reasoning as the key metric for engineering competence.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Multimodal reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 16 of its 52 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Sep 2025.

Builds on

16 of 52 references.

Closest ancestors · 1

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025GLM-4.5V and GLM-4.1V-Thinking: Towards Versatile Multimodal Reasoning with Scalable Reinforcement Learning1 Jul

Other references · 15

  1. 2025Qwen2.5-VL Technical Reportcited by 5,587
  2. 2025Gemini 2.5: Pushing the Frontier with Advanced Reasoning, Multimodality, Long Context, and Next Generation Agentic Capabilitiescited by 3,796
  3. 2025InternVL3: Exploring Advanced Training and Test-Time Recipes for Open-Source Multimodal Modelscited by 1,834
  4. 2025Gemma 3 Technical Reportcited by 1,824
  5. 2021Inter-GPS: Interpretable Geometry Problem Solving with Formal Language and Symbolic Reasoningcited by 383
  6. 2023CktGNN: Circuit Graph Neural Network for Electronic Design Automationcited by 58
  7. 2025AnalogGenie: A Generative Engine for Automatic Discovery of Analog Circuit Topologiescited by 37
  8. 2025SeePhys: Does Seeing Help Thinking? -- Benchmarking Vision-Based Physics Reasoningcited by 34
  9. 2024LaMAGIC: Language-Model-based Topology Generation for Analog Integrated Circuitscited by 33
  10. 2025Enhancing the Geometric Problem-Solving Ability of Multimodal LLMs via Symbolic-Neural Integrationcited by 18
  11. 2024EEE-Bench: A Comprehensive Multimodal Electrical And Electronics Engineering Benchmarkcited by 15
  12. 2025AMSbench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Evaluating MLLM Capabilities in AMS Circuitscited by 15
3 more
  1. 2025CIRCUIT: A Benchmark for Circuit Interpretation and Reasoning Capabilities of LLMscited by 11
  2. 2025Mimicking the Physicist's Eye:A VLM-centric Approach for Physics Formula Discoverycited by 7
  3. 2025MMCircuitEval: A Comprehensive Multimodal Circuit-Focused Benchmark for Evaluating LLMscited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.

3 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026CircuitReason-1k: Benchmarking Long-Horizon Visual-to-Symbolic Reasoning inElectrical Circuits
  2. 2026Circuit-MLLM: Topological Logic-Guided Latent-Space Visual Reasoning for Circuit Schematic Understanding
  3. 2026OmniSch: A Multimodal PCB Schematic Benchmark For Structured Diagram Visual Reasoning
  4. 2026DiagramNet: An End-to-End Recognition Framework and Dataset for Non-Standard System-Level Diagrams
  5. 2026Enginuity: A Dataset and Benchmark for Vision-Language Understanding of Engineering Diagrams
  6. 2026CircuitLM: A Multi-Agent LLM-Aided Design Framework for Generating Circuit Schematics from Natural Language Prompts
  7. 2025EngiBench: A Benchmark for Evaluating Large Language Models on Engineering Problem Solving
  8. 2026Beyond Pixels: Vector-to-Graph Transformation for Reliable Schematic Auditing