mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Character-Level Perturbations Disrupt LLM Watermarks

arXiv 2509.09112 ↗First posted 11 Sep 2025cs.CR cs.AIcited by 9

On the map: LLM safety and security → Watermarking generated content and models

Abstract (arXiv)

Large Language Model (LLM) watermarking embeds detectable signals into generated text for copyright protection, misuse prevention, and content detection. While prior studies evaluate robustness using watermark removal attacks, these methods are often suboptimal, creating the misconception that effective removal requires large perturbations or powerful adversaries. To bridge the gap, we first formalize the system model for LLM watermark, and characterize two realistic threat models constrained on limited access to the watermark detector. We then analyze how different types of perturbation vary in their attack range, i.e., the number of tokens they can affect with a single edit. We observe that character-level perturbations (e.g., typos, swaps, deletions, homoglyphs) can influence multiple tokens simultaneously by disrupting the tokenization process. We demonstrate that character-level perturbations are significantly more effective for watermark removal under the most restrictive threat model. We further propose guided removal attacks based on the Genetic Algorithm (GA) that uses a reference detector for optimization. Under a practical threat model with limited black-box queries to the watermark detector, our method demonstrates strong removal performance. Experiments confirm the superiority of character-level perturbations and the effectiveness of the GA in removing watermarks under realistic constraints. Additionally, we argue there is an adversarial dilemma when considering potential defenses: any fixed defense can be bypassed by a suitable perturbation strategy. Motivated by this principle, we propose an adaptive compound character-level attack. Experimental results show that this approach can effectively defeat the defenses. Our findings highlight significant vulnerabilities in existing LLM watermark schemes and underline the urgency for the development of new robust mechanisms.

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Watermarking generated content and models, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security. Builds on 39 of its 65 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Sep 2025.

Builds on

39 of 65 references.

Closest ancestors · 20

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025BiMark: Unbiased Multilayer Watermarking for Large Language Models19 Jun
  2. 2024Watermark under Fire: A Robustness Evaluation of LLM Watermarking20 Nov
  3. 2024B4: A Black-Box Scrubbing Attack on LLM Watermarks2 Nov
  4. 2024De-mark: Watermark Removal in Large Language Models17 Oct
  5. 2024A Certified Robust Watermark For Large Language Models29 Sep
  6. 2024On Evaluating The Performance of Watermarked Machine-Generated Texts Under Adversarial Attacks5 Jul
  7. 2024MarkLLM: An Open-Source Toolkit for LLM Watermarking16 May
  8. 2024Bypassing LLM Watermarks with Color-Aware Substitutions19 Mar
  9. 2024Watermark Stealing in Large Language Models29 Feb
  10. 2024No Free Lunch in LLM Watermarking: Trade-offs in Watermarking Design Choices25 Feb
  11. 2024Can Watermarks Survive Translation? On the Cross-lingual Consistency of Text Watermark for Large Language Models21 Feb
  12. 2023Mark My Words: Analyzing and Evaluating Language Model Watermarks1 Dec
8 more
  1. 2023A Resilient and Accessible Distribution-Preserving Watermark for Large Language Models11 Oct
  2. 2023Unbiased Watermark for Large Language Models22 Sep
  3. 2023Robust Distortion-free Watermarks for Language Models28 Jul
  4. 2023Provable Robust Watermarking for AI-Generated Text30 Jun
  5. 2023On the Reliability of Watermarks for Large Language Models7 Jun
  6. 2023Undetectable Watermarks for Language Models25 May
  7. 2023Paraphrasing evades detectors of AI-generated text, but retrieval is an effective defense23 Mar
  8. 2023A Watermark for Large Language Models24 Jan

Other references · 19

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  2. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,599
  3. 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 14,132
  4. 2022OPT: Open Pre-trained Transformer Language Modelscited by 3,512
  5. 2018TextBugger: Generating Adversarial Text Against Real-world Applicationscited by 381
  6. 2018Black-box Generation of Adversarial Text Sequences to Evade Deep Learning Classifierscited by 345
  7. 2020Entangled Watermarks as a Defense against Model Extractioncited by 149
  8. 2023On the Risk of Misinformation Pollution with Large Language Modelscited by 128
  9. 2022SSLGuard: A Watermarking Scheme for Self-supervised Learning Pre-trained Encoderscited by 45
  10. 2023Unraveling Privacy Risks of Individual Fairness in Graph Neural Networkscited by 16
  11. 2024Dynamic Graph Unlearning: A General and Efficient Post-Processing Method via Gradient Transformationcited by 15
  12. 2024SilverSpeak: Evading AI-Generated Text Detectors using Homoglyphscited by 13
7 more
  1. 2025AuthorMist: Evading AI Text Detectors with Reinforcement Learningcited by 9
  2. 2022Evaluating Membership Inference Through Adversarial Robustnesscited by 8
  3. 2021Self-Supervised Adversarial Example Detection by Disentangled Representationcited by 7
  4. 2023Masked Language Model Based Textual Adversarial Example Detectioncited by 5
  5. 2025Not All Edges are Equally Robust: Evaluating the Robustness of Ranking-Based Federated Learningcited by 4
  6. 2025Exploring Gradient-Guided Masked Language Model to Detect Textual Adversarial Attackscited by 4
  7. 2025When Better Features Mean Greater Risks: The Performance-Privacy Trade-Off in Contrastive Learningcited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 8.

9 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024Optimizing Adaptive Attacks against Watermarks for Language Models
  2. 2025Modification and Generated-Text Detection: Achieving Dual Detection Capabilities for the Outputs of LLM by Watermark
  3. 2025Enhancing LLM Watermark Resilience Against Both Scrubbing and Spoofing Attacks
  4. 2025Defending LLM Watermarking Against Spoofing Attacks with Contrastive Representation Learning
  5. 2026Beyond A Fixed Seal: Adaptive Stealing Watermark in Large Language Models
  6. 2025Revealing Weaknesses in Text Watermarking Through Self-Information Rewrite Attacks
  7. 2024Large Language Model Watermark Stealing With Mixed Integer Programming
  8. 2024Discovering Spoofing Attempts on Language Model Watermarks