mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Tracing Provenance and Detecting Tampering with Complementary LLM Watermarks

arXiv 2608.12713 ↗First posted 13 Aug 2026cs.CR cs.AI cs.CLcited by 1

On the map: LLM safety and security → Watermarking generated content and models

Abstract (arXiv)

Watermarking LLM-generated text is an important task for tracing its provenance. Existing LLM watermarks preserve provenance under editing, but this same robustness allows an adversary to alter critical content while retaining attribution, a vulnerability known as piggyback spoofing. We introduce an innovative watermark that jointly provides provenance and tamper evidence. It co-embeds a robust signal and a fragile signal into each generated token. The signals share the same mechanism but use independent keys and different seeding windows over normalized text, making one resilient to edits and the other sensitive to reader-visible changes. Multiple rounds of unbiased tournament reweighting preserve the expected generation distribution, while a periodic round-allocation pattern controls the trade-off between the two signals. At detection, their scores form a two-dimensional space supporting three decisions: Intact, Tampered, and No-Watermark. Across two large language models and two prompt datasets, our method demonstrates the highest tamper-detection rate among the evaluated methods while maintaining competitive attribution robustness and perplexity. Ablation studies show that reliable three-state detection requires a well-defined notion of intactness, co-embedding of the two signals, and complementary sensitivity to edits.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Watermarking generated content and models, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security. Builds on 29 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Aug 2026.

Builds on

29 of 41 references.

Closest ancestors · 21

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025An Ensemble Framework for Unbiased Language Model Watermarking28 Sep
  2. 2025Character-Level Perturbations Disrupt LLM Watermarks11 Sep
  3. 2025Enhancing LLM Watermark Resilience Against Both Scrubbing and Spoofing Attacks8 Jul
  4. 2025BiMark: Unbiased Multilayer Watermarking for Large Language Models19 Jun
  5. 2025Defending LLM Watermarking Against Spoofing Attacks with Contrastive Representation Learning9 Apr
  6. 2025Improved Unbiased Watermark for Large Language Models16 Feb
  7. 2024Bileve: Securing Text Provenance in Large Language Models Against Spoofing with Bi-level Signature4 Jun
  8. 2024Watermark Stealing in Large Language Models29 Feb
  9. 2024No Free Lunch in LLM Watermarking: Trade-offs in Watermarking Design Choices25 Feb
  10. 2024Adaptive Text Watermark for Large Language Models25 Jan
  11. 2023A Robust Semantics-based Watermark for Large Language Model against Paraphrasing15 Nov
  12. 2023A Resilient and Accessible Distribution-Preserving Watermark for Large Language Models11 Oct
9 more
  1. 2023A Semantic Invariant Robust Watermark for Large Language Models10 Oct
  2. 2023Unbiased Watermark for Large Language Models22 Sep
  3. 2023An Unforgeable Publicly Verifiable Watermark for Large Language Models30 Jul
  4. 2023Robust Distortion-free Watermarks for Language Models28 Jul
  5. 2023Provable Robust Watermarking for AI-Generated Text30 Jun
  6. 2023On the Reliability of Watermarks for Large Language Models7 Jun
  7. 2023Undetectable Watermarks for Language Models25 May
  8. 2023Paraphrasing evades detectors of AI-generated text, but retrieval is an effective defense23 Mar
  9. 2023A Watermark for Large Language Models24 Jan

Other references · 8

  1. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,491
  2. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,192
  3. 2023Mistral 7Bcited by 3,065
  4. 2025gpt-oss-120b & gpt-oss-20b Model Cardcited by 1,258
  5. 2024Gemma: Open Models Based on Gemini Research and Technologycited by 889
  6. 2023DetectGPT: Zero-Shot Machine-Generated Text Detection using Probability Curvaturecited by 705
  7. 2019ELI5: Long Form Question Answeringcited by 567
  8. 2022TweetNLP: Cutting-Edge Natural Language Processing for Social Mediacited by 71

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.