mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

SilverSpeak: Evading AI-Generated Text Detectors using Homoglyphs

arXiv 2406.11239 ↗First posted 17 Jun 2024cs.CL cs.AIcited by 11

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The advent of Large Language Models (LLMs) has enabled the generation of text that increasingly exhibits human-like characteristics. As the detection of such content is of significant importance, substantial research has been conducted with the objective of developing reliable AI-generated text detectors. These detectors have demonstrated promising results on test data, but recent research has revealed that they can be circumvented by employing different techniques. In this paper, we present homoglyph-based attacks (A rightarrow Cyrillic A) as a means of circumventing existing detectors. We conduct a comprehensive evaluation to assess the effectiveness of these attacks on seven detectors, including ArguGPT, Binoculars, DetectGPT, Fast-DetectGPT, Ghostbuster, OpenAI's detector, and watermarking techniques, on five different datasets. Our findings demonstrate that homoglyph-based attacks can effectively circumvent state-of-the-art detectors, leading them to classify all texts as either AI-generated or human-written (decreasing the average Matthews Correlation Coefficient from 0.64 to -0.01). Through further examination, we extract the technical justification underlying the success of the attacks, which varies across detectors. Finally, we discuss the implications of these findings and potential defenses against such attacks.

Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Jun 2024.

Builds on

21 of 44 references.

References · 21

  1. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
  2. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,491
  3. 2015Neural Machine Translation of Rare Words with Subword Unitscited by 2,898
  4. 2018UMAP: Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection for Dimension Reductioncited by 2,841
  5. 2019HuggingFace's Transformers: State-of-the-art Natural Language Processingcited by 2,201
  6. 2019Release Strategies and the Social Impacts of Language Modelscited by 505
  7. 2019GLTR: Statistical Detection and Visualization of Generated Textcited by 490
  8. 2023Paraphrasing evades detectors of AI-generated text, but retrieval is an effective defensecited by 401
  9. 2023Can AI-Generated Text be Reliably Detected?cited by 372
  10. 2023Fast-DetectGPT: Efficient Zero-Shot Detection of Machine-Generated Text via Conditional Probability Curvaturecited by 278
  11. 2024Spotting LLMs With Binoculars: Zero-Shot Detection of Machine-Generated Textcited by 255
  12. 2023DetectLLM: Leveraging Log Rank Information for Zero-Shot Detection of Machine-Generated Textcited by 207
9 more
  1. 2023GPT detectors are biased against non-native English writerscited by 175
  2. 2023Ghostbuster: Detecting Text Ghostwritten by Large Language Modelscited by 90
  3. 2024WaterMax: breaking the LLM watermark detectability-robustness-quality trade-offcited by 48
  4. 2023Large Language Models can be Guided to Evade AI-Generated Text Detectioncited by 43
  5. 2023ArguGPT: evaluating, understanding and identifying argumentative essays generated by GPT modelscited by 41
  6. 2024Is ChatGPT Transforming Academics' Writing Style?cited by 26
  7. 2023Evade ChatGPT Detectors via A Single Spacecited by 18
  8. 2024Hidding the Ghostwriters: An Adversarial Evaluation of AI-Generated Student Essay Detectioncited by 10
  9. 2018Detecting Homoglyph Attacks with a Siamese Neural Networkcited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 5; 2026: 6.

11 papers.