mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Watermark under Fire: A Robustness Evaluation of LLM Watermarking

arXiv 2411.13425 ↗First posted 20 Nov 2024cs.CR cs.CL cs.LGcited by 9

On the map: LLM safety and security → Watermarking generated content and models

Abstract (arXiv)

Various watermarking methods (``watermarkers'') have been proposed to identify LLM-generated texts; yet, due to the lack of unified evaluation platforms, many critical questions remain under-explored: i) What are the strengths/limitations of various watermarkers, especially their attack robustness? ii) How do various design choices impact their robustness? iii) How to optimally operate watermarkers in adversarial environments? To fill this gap, we systematize existing LLM watermarkers and watermark removal attacks, mapping out their design spaces. We then develop WaterPark, a unified platform that integrates 10 state-of-the-art watermarkers and 12 representative attacks. More importantly, by leveraging WaterPark, we conduct a comprehensive assessment of existing watermarkers, unveiling the impact of various design choices on their attack robustness. We further explore the best practices to operate watermarkers in adversarial environments. We believe our study sheds light on current LLM watermarking techniques while WaterPark serves as a valuable testbed to facilitate future research.

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Watermarking generated content and models, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security. Builds on 34 of its 83 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Nov 2024.

Builds on

34 of 83 references.

Closest ancestors · 15

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024An Entropy-based Text Watermarking Detection Method20 Mar
  2. 2024WaterMax: breaking the LLM watermark detectability-robustness-quality trade-off6 Mar
  3. 2023A Survey of Text Watermarking in the Era of Large Language Models13 Dec
  4. 2023New Evaluation Metrics Capture Quality Degradation due to LLM Watermarking4 Dec
  5. 2023A Robust Semantics-based Watermark for Large Language Model against Paraphrasing15 Nov
  6. 2023Watermarks in the Sand: Impossibility of Strong Watermarking for Generative Models7 Nov
  7. 2023Publicly-Detectable Watermarking for Language Models27 Oct
  8. 2023CodeMark: Imperceptible Watermarking for Code Datasets against Neural Code Completion Models28 Aug
  9. 2023Robust Distortion-free Watermarks for Language Models28 Jul
  10. 2023Provable Robust Watermarking for AI-Generated Text30 Jun
  11. 2023Who Wrote this Code? Watermarking for Code Generation24 May
  12. 2023Watermarking Text Data on Large Language Models for Dataset Copyright22 May
3 more
  1. 2023Watermarking Text Generated by Black-Box Language Models14 May
  2. 2023Paraphrasing evades detectors of AI-generated text, but retrieval is an effective defense23 Mar
  3. 2023Can AI-Generated Text be Reliably Detected?17 Mar

Other references · 19

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  2. 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 13,028
  3. 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,512
  4. 2018SentencePiece: A simple and language independent subword tokenizer and detokenizer for Neural Text Processingcited by 1,989
  5. 2022Atlas: Few-shot Learning with Retrieval Augmented Language Modelscited by 952
  6. 2023DetectGPT: Zero-Shot Machine-Generated Text Detection using Probability Curvaturecited by 726
  7. 2021MAUVE: Measuring the Gap Between Neural Text and Human Text using Divergence Frontierscited by 470
  8. 2018TextBugger: Generating Adversarial Text Against Real-world Applicationscited by 381
  9. 2021Gradient-based Adversarial Attacks against Text Transformerscited by 234
  10. 2020Adversarial Watermarking Transformer: Towards Tracing Text Provenance with Data Hidingcited by 130
  11. 2021SoK: How Robust is Image Classification Deep Neural Network Watermarking? (Extended Version)cited by 69
  12. 2021CoProtector: Protect Open-Source Code against Unauthorized Training Usage with Data Poisoningcited by 47
7 more
  1. 2024Robustifying Safety-Aligned Large Language Models through Clean Data Curationcited by 44
  2. 2020Enabling On-Device CNN Training by Self-Supervised Instance Filtering and Error Map Pruningcited by 24
  3. 2024RobustKV: Defending Large Language Models against Jailbreak Attacks via KV Evictioncited by 21
  4. 2020Intermittent Inference with Nonuniformly Compressed Multi-Exit Neural Network for Energy Harvesting Powered Devicescited by 19
  5. 2024Sequential LLM Framework for Fashion Recommendationcited by 6
  6. 2024MalleTrain: Deep Neural Network Training on Unfillable Supercomputer Nodescited by 5
  7. 2024Data to Defense: The Role of Curation in Customizing LLMs Against Jailbreaking Attackscited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 7.

9 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026MarkSec: Capability-Aware Evaluation of Adversarial Attacks Against LLM Watermarks
  2. 2024No Free Lunch in LLM Watermarking: Trade-offs in Watermarking Design Choices
  3. 2024On Evaluating The Performance of Watermarked Machine-Generated Texts Under Adversarial Attacks
  4. 2024Optimizing Adaptive Attacks against Watermarks for Language Models
  5. 2026AutoMark: Enabling Autoresearch to Discover Better LLM Watermarks
  6. 2025Signature vs. Substance: Evaluating the Balance of Adversarial Resistance and Linguistic Quality in Watermarking Large Language Models
  7. 2021Evaluating the Robustness of Trigger Set-Based Watermarks Embedded in Deep Neural Networks
  8. 2025When There Is No Decoder: Removing Watermarks from Stable Diffusion Models in a No-box Setting