mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

B4: A Black-Box Scrubbing Attack on LLM Watermarks

arXiv 2411.01222 ↗First posted 2 Nov 2024cs.CLcited by 7

On the map: LLM safety and security → Watermarking generated content and models

Abstract (arXiv)

Watermarking has emerged as a prominent technique for LLM-generated content detection by embedding imperceptible patterns. Despite supreme performance, its robustness against adversarial attacks remains underexplored. Previous work typically considers a grey-box attack setting, where the specific type of watermark is already known. Some even necessitates knowledge about hyperparameters of the watermarking method. Such prerequisites are unattainable in real-world scenarios. Targeting at a more realistic black-box threat model with fewer assumptions, we here propose B4, a black-box scrubbing attack on watermarks. Specifically, we formulate the watermark scrubbing attack as a constrained optimization problem by capturing its objectives with two distributions, a Watermark Distribution and a Fidelity Distribution. This optimization problem can be approximately solved using two proxy distributions. Experimental results across 12 different settings demonstrate the superior performance of B4 compared with other baselines.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Watermarking generated content and models, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security. Builds on 16 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Nov 2024.

Builds on

16 of 30 references.

Closest ancestors · 9

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024Watermark Stealing in Large Language Models29 Feb
  2. 2023On the Learnability of Watermarks for Language Models7 Dec
  3. 2023Improving the Generation Quality of Watermarked Large Language Models via Word Importance Scoring16 Nov
  4. 2023A Robust Semantics-based Watermark for Large Language Model against Paraphrasing15 Nov
  5. 2023Watermarks in the Sand: Impossibility of Strong Watermarking for Generative Models7 Nov
  6. 2023Robust Distortion-free Watermarks for Language Models28 Jul
  7. 2023Provable Robust Watermarking for AI-Generated Text30 Jun
  8. 2023Paraphrasing evades detectors of AI-generated text, but retrieval is an effective defense23 Mar
  9. 2023Can AI-Generated Text be Reliably Detected?17 Mar

Other references · 7

  1. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,599
  2. 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 14,132
  3. 2015Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Networkcited by 10,324
  4. 2019The Curious Case of Neural Text Degenerationcited by 2,916
  5. 2016Sequence-Level Knowledge Distillationcited by 801
  6. 2023DetectGPT: Zero-Shot Machine-Generated Text Detection using Probability Curvaturecited by 726
  7. 2023A Survey on Detection of LLMs-Generated Contentcited by 71

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 4; 2026: 3.

7 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024Watermark under Fire: A Robustness Evaluation of LLM Watermarking
  2. 2025Fading the Digital Ink: A Universal Black-Box Attack Framework for 3DGS Watermarking Systems
  3. 2025When There Is No Decoder: Removing Watermarks from Stable Diffusion Models in a No-box Setting
  4. 2024Black-Box Detection of Language Model Watermarks
  5. 2024The Efficacy of Transfer-based No-box Attacks on Image Watermarking: A Pragmatic Analysis ↗
  6. 2026Rethinking Forgery Attacks on Semantic Watermarks in Black-Box Settings: A Geometric Distortion Perspective
  7. 2025First-Place Solution to NeurIPS 2024 Invisible Watermark Removal Challenge
  8. 2025Transferable Black-Box One-Shot Forging of Watermarks via Image Preference Models