mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

From Label Error Detection to Correction: A Modular Framework and Benchmark for Object Detection Datasets

arXiv 2508.06556 ↗First posted 6 Aug 2025cs.CV cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Object detection has advanced rapidly in recent years, driven by increasingly large and diverse datasets. However, label errors often compromise the quality of these datasets and affect the outcomes of training and benchmark evaluations. Although label error detection methods for object detection datasets now exist, they are typically validated only on synthetic benchmarks or via limited manual inspection. How to correct such errors systematically and at scale remains an open problem. We introduce a semi-automated framework for label error correction called Rechecked. Building on existing label error detection methods, their error proposals are reviewed with lightweight, crowd-sourced microtasks. We apply Rechecked to the class pedestrian in the KITTI dataset, for which we crowdsourced high-quality corrected annotations. We detect 18% of missing and inaccurate labels in the original ground truth. We show that current label error detection methods, when combined with our correction framework, can recover hundreds of errors with little human effort compared to annotation from scratch. However, even the best methods still miss up to 66% of the label errors, which motivates further research, now enabled by our released benchmark.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 43 of its 63 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Aug 2025.

Builds on

43 of 63 references.

References · 43

  1. 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,498
  2. 2018Attention U-Net: Learning Where to Look for the Pancreascited by 1,420
  3. 2019MMDetection: Open MMLab Detection Toolbox and Benchmarkcited by 1,379
  4. 2017Cascade R-CNN: Delving into High Quality Object Detectioncited by 1,275
  5. 2021YOLOX: Exceeding YOLO Series in 2021cited by 1,064
  6. 2017Revisiting Unreasonable Effectiveness of Data in Deep Learning Eracited by 916
  7. 2020Learning from Noisy Labels with Deep Neural Networks: A Surveycited by 580
  8. 2018The Open Images Dataset V4: Unified image classification, object detection, and visual relationship detection at scalecited by 542
  9. 2019Confident Learning: Estimating Uncertainty in Dataset Labelscited by 411
  10. 2021Pervasive Label Errors in Test Sets Destabilize Machine Learning Benchmarkscited by 388
  11. 2019Deep Multi-modal Object Detection and Semantic Segmentation for Autonomous Driving: Datasets, Methods, and Challengescited by 313
  12. 2021Dealing with Disagreements: Looking Beyond the Majority Vote in Subjective Annotationscited by 306
31 more
  1. 2016Efficient Multi-Scale 3D CNN with Fully Connected CRF for Accurate Brain Lesion Segmentationcited by 263
  2. 2021Learning with Noisy Labels Revisited: A Study Using Real-World Human Annotationscited by 253
  3. 2019Deep learning with noisy labels: exploring techniques and remedies in medical image analysiscited by 173
  4. 2018An overview of deep learning in medical imaging focusing on MRIcited by 140
  5. 2021Re-labeling ImageNet: from Single to Multi-Labels, from Global to Localized Labelscited by 117
  6. 2019A Survey of Deep Learning Applications to Autonomous Vehicle Controlcited by 101
  7. 2022Pushing the limits of self-supervised ResNets: Can we outperform supervised learning without labels on ImageNet?cited by 67
  8. 2022When does dough become a bagel? Analyzing the remaining mistakes on ImageNetcited by 60
  9. 2020A Realistic Fish-Habitat Dataset to Evaluate Algorithms for Underwater Visual Analysiscited by 57
  10. 2020A survey on Semi-, Self- and Unsupervised Learning for Image Classificationcited by 55
  11. 2021Active label cleaning for improved dataset quality under resource constraintscited by 44
  12. 2022Is one annotation enough? A data-centric image classification benchmark for noisy and ambiguous label estimationcited by 43
  13. 2016Crowdsourcing in Computer Visioncited by 31
  14. 2022Automated Detection of Label Errors in Semantic Segmentation Datasets via Deep Learning and Uncertainty Quantificationcited by 20
  15. 2024Are LLMs Better than Reported? Detecting Label Errors and Mitigating Their Effect on Model Performancecited by 20
  16. 2020MetaDetect: Uncertainty Quantification and Prediction Quality Estimates for Object Detectioncited by 18
  17. 2021Improving Object Detection by Label Assignment Distillationcited by 17
  18. 2022CROWDLAB: Supervised learning to infer consensus labels and quality scores for data with multiple annotatorscited by 16
  19. 2023Identifying Label Errors in Object Detection Datasets by Loss Inspectioncited by 16
  20. 2022Identifying Incorrect Annotations in Multi-Label Classification Datacited by 12
  21. 2023ObjectLab: Automated Diagnosis of Mislabeled Images in Object Detection Datacited by 11
  22. 2021A data-centric approach for improving ambiguous labels with combined semi-supervised classification and clusteringcited by 9
  23. 2024Active Label Correction for Semantic Segmentation with Foundation Modelscited by 7
  24. 2024Improving Label Error Detection and Elimination with Uncertainty Quantificationcited by 4
  25. 2023Label Smarter, Not Harder: CleverLabel for Faster Annotation of Ambiguous Image Classification with Higher Qualitycited by 3
  26. 2023LMD: Light-weight Prediction Quality Estimation for Object Detection in Lidar Point Cloudscited by 3
  27. 2014Microtask crowdsourcing for disease mention annotation in PubMed abstractscited by 2
  28. 2022Opportunistic hip fracture risk prediction in Men from X-ray: Findings from the Osteoporosis in Men (MrOS) Studycited by 2
  29. 2024PS-TTL: Prototype-based Soft-labels and Test-Time Learning for Few-shot Object Detectioncited by 2
  30. 2025A2LC: Active and Automated Label Correction for Semantic Segmentationcited by 2
  31. 2023IAdet: Simplest human-in-the-loop object detectioncited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.