mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Enabling Self-Improving Agents to Learn at Test Time With Human-In-The-Loop Guidance

arXiv 2507.17131 ↗First posted 23 Jul 2025cs.LG cs.AIcited by 14

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks

also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)

Large language model (LLM) agents often struggle in environments where rules and required domain knowledge frequently change, such as regulatory compliance and user risk screening. Current approaches, like offline fine-tuning and standard prompting, are insufficient because they cannot effectively adapt to new knowledge during actual operation. To address this limitation, we propose the Adaptive Reflective Interactive Agent (ARIA), an LLM agent framework designed specifically to continuously learn updated domain knowledge at test time. ARIA assesses its own uncertainty through structured self-dialogue, proactively identifying knowledge gaps and requesting targeted explanations or corrections from human experts. It then systematically updates an internal, timestamped knowledge repository with provided human guidance, detecting and resolving conflicting or outdated knowledge through comparisons and clarification queries. We evaluate ARIA on the realistic customer due diligence name screening task on TikTok Pay, alongside publicly available dynamic knowledge tasks. Results demonstrate significant improvements in adaptability and accuracy compared to baselines using standard offline fine-tuning and existing self-improving agents. ARIA is deployed within TikTok Pay serving over 150 million monthly active users, confirming its practicality and effectiveness for operational use in rapidly evolving environments.

Key facts. Cited by 14 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 22 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Jul 2025.

Builds on

22 of 39 references.

Closest ancestors · 1

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024Understanding the planning of LLM agents: A survey5 Feb

Other references · 21

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  2. 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,297
  3. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 8,065
  4. 2021On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Modelscited by 4,033
  5. 2023Improving Factuality and Reasoning in Language Models through Multiagent Debatecited by 1,784
  6. 2021MetaICL: Learning to Learn In Contextcited by 454
  7. 2021CUAD: An Expert-Annotated NLP Dataset for Legal Contract Reviewcited by 236
  8. 2023Large Language Models Are Latent Variable Models: Explaining and Finding Good Demonstrations for In-Context Learningcited by 149
  9. 2023GraphMAE2: A Decoding-Enhanced Masked Self-Supervised Graph Learnercited by 132
  10. 2024UniGraph: Learning a Unified Cross-Domain Foundation Model for Text-Attributed Graphscited by 66
  11. 2025MLR-Bench: Evaluating AI Agents on Open-Ended Machine Learning Researchcited by 64
  12. 2025FlowReasoner: Reinforcing Query-Level Meta-Agentscited by 63
9 more
  1. 2025Efficient Inference for Large Reasoning Models: A Surveycited by 61
  2. 2025Can Indirect Prompt Injection Attacks Be Detected and Removed?cited by 52
  3. 2025UniGraph2: Learning a Unified Embedding Space to Bind Multimodal Graphscited by 49
  4. 2024FiDeLiS: Faithful Reasoning in Large Language Model for Knowledge Graph Question Answeringcited by 39
  5. 2025Evaluating the Paperclip Maximizer: Are RL-Based Language Models More Likely to Pursue Instrumental Goals?cited by 33
  6. 2023LLM A*: Human in the Loop Large Language Models Enabled A* Search for Roboticscited by 26
  7. 2024Can Knowledge Graphs Make Large Language Models More Trustworthy? An Empirical Study Over Open-ended Question Answeringcited by 24
  8. 2025Robustness via Referencing: Defending against Prompt Injection Attacks by Referencing the Executed Instructioncited by 16
  9. 2025LLM-based Automated Grading with Human-in-the-Loopcited by 13

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 4; 2026: 10.

14 papers.

Sort:

By area:

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026ServeLearnBench: How Well Can Agents Self-Improve from Serving Experience?
  2. 2026TRACE: A Self-Evolving Skill Bank for Consistent, Limit-Aware LLM Agents
  3. 2025Learn-by-interact: A Data-Centric Framework for Self-Adaptive Agents in Realistic Environments
  4. 2026Learn Like Humans: Use Meta-cognitive Reflection for Efficient Self-Improvement
  5. 2025EvolveR: Self-Evolving LLM Agents through an Experience-Driven Lifecycle
  6. 2025Agent Fine-tuning through Distillation for Domain-specific LLMs in Microdomains
  7. 2026SkillAdaptor: Self-Adapting Skills for LLM Agents from Trajectories
  8. 2026Agent Gym: A Framework for Continuous Evaluation and Evolution of LLM Agents Through Human-in-the-Loop Feedback