Ground-Compose-Reinforce: Grounding Language in Agentic Behaviours using Limited Data
On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Reinforcement learning for LLM agents
Abstract (arXiv)
Grounding language in perception and action is a key challenge when building situated agents that can interact with humans, or other agents, via language. In the past, addressing this challenge has required manually designing the language grounding or curating massive datasets that associate language with the environment. We propose Ground-Compose-Reinforce, an end-to-end, neurosymbolic framework for training RL agents directly from high-level task specifications--without manually designed reward functions or other domain-specific oracles, and without massive datasets. These task specifications take the form of Reward Machines, automata-based representations that capture high-level task structure and are in some cases autoformalizable from natural language. Critically, we show that Reward Machines can be grounded using limited data by exploiting compositionality. Experiments in a custom Meta-World domain with only 350 labelled pretraining trajectories show that our framework faithfully elicits complex behaviours from high-level specifications--including behaviours that never appear in pretraining--while non-compositional approaches fail.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Reinforcement learning for LLM agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 54 of its 96 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Jul 2025.
Builds on
54 of 96 references.
References · 54
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
- 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
- 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,411
- 2014Learning Phrase Representations using RNN Encoder-Decoder for Statistical Machine Translationcited by 4,016
- 2021On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Modelscited by 3,961
- 2023RT-2: Vision-Language-Action Models Transfer Web Knowledge to Robotic Controlcited by 2,993
- 2020Learning to summarize from human feedbackcited by 2,562
- 2022Do As I Can, Not As I Say: Grounding Language in Robotic Affordancescited by 2,302
- 2024π0: A Vision-Language-Action Flow Model for General Robot Controlcited by 2,297
- 2019Meta-World: A Benchmark and Evaluation for Multi-Task and Meta Reinforcement Learningcited by 1,168
- 2022Inner Monologue: Embodied Reasoning through Planning with Language Modelscited by 1,057
38 more
- 2022Video PreTraining (VPT): Learning to Act by Watching Unlabeled Online Videoscited by 338
- 2018BabyAI: A Platform to Study the Sample Efficiency of Grounded Language Learningcited by 238
- 2025Hi Robot: Open-Ended Instruction Following with Hierarchical Vision-Language-Action Modelscited by 216
- 2016Modular Multitask Reinforcement Learning with Policy Sketchescited by 200
- 2022Defining and Characterizing Reward Hackingcited by 184
- 2020Reward Machines: Exploiting Reward Function Structure in Reinforcement Learningcited by 183
- 2023LIV: Language-Image Representations and Rewards for Robotic Controlcited by 180
- 2023Vision-Language Models are Zero-Shot Reward Models for Reinforcement Learningcited by 155
- 2023Scaling Laws for Generative Mixed-Modal Language Modelscited by 131
- 2016Reinforcement Learning With Temporal Logic Rewardscited by 114
- 2022Mildly Conservative Q-Learning for Offline Reinforcement Learningcited by 112
- 2017Grounded Language Learning in a Simulated 3D Worldcited by 100
- 2024Chain of Thoughtlessness? An Analysis of CoT in Planningcited by 100
- 2017Zero-Shot Task Generalization with Multi-Task Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 97
- 2023STEVE-1: A Generative Model for Text-to-Behavior in Minecraftcited by 95
- 2018Learning to Understand Goal Specifications by Modelling Rewardcited by 80
- 2017Gated-Attention Architectures for Task-Oriented Language Groundingcited by 72
- 2021LTL2Action: Generalizing LTL Instructions for Multi-Task RLcited by 72
- 2020A Composable Specification Language for Reinforcement Learning Taskscited by 68
- 2016Q-Learning for Robust Satisfaction of Signal Temporal Logic Specificationscited by 65
- 2023Vision-Language Models as a Source of Rewardscited by 65
- 2023NL2TL: Transforming Natural Languages to Temporal Logics using Large Language Modelscited by 57
- 2020Grounded Language Learning Fast and Slowcited by 54
- 2023Grounding Complex Natural Language Commands for Temporal Tasks in Unseen Environmentscited by 52
- 2020A Boolean Task Algebra for Reinforcement Learningcited by 46
- 2020Encoding formulas as deep networks: Reinforcement learning for zero-shot execution of LTL formulascited by 36
- 2020Temporal-Logic-Based Reward Shaping for Continuing Reinforcement Learning Taskscited by 28
- 2020Induction and Exploitation of Subgoal Automata for Reinforcement Learningcited by 26
- 2024FuRL: Visual-Language Models as Fuzzy Rewards for Reinforcement Learningcited by 26
- 2024DeepLTL: Learning to Efficiently Satisfy Complex LTL Specifications for Multi-Task RLcited by 20
- 2023Eventual Discounting Temporal Logic Counterfactual Experience Replaycited by 18
- 2024Compositional Automata Embeddings for Goal-Conditioned Reinforcement Learningcited by 18
- 2021In a Nutshell, the Human Asked for This: Latent Goals for Following Temporal Specificationscited by 17
- 2019Specification Patterns for Robotic Missionscited by 16
- 2024Reward Machines for Deep RL in Noisy and Uncertain Environmentscited by 11
- 2022Noisy Symbolic Abstractions for Deep RL: A case study with Reward Machinescited by 10
- 2022Skill Machines: Temporal Logic Skill Composition in Reinforcement Learningcited by 7
- 2024Learning Robust Reward Machines from Noisy Labelscited by 7
50 most cited of 54 All 54 (JSON)
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 4.
5 papers.
- 2025Beyond Fixed Tasks: Unsupervised Environment Design for Task-Level Pairscited by 2
- 2026PlatoLTL: Scaling LTL-Guided Multi-Task RLcited by 2
- 2026Learning Bilevel Policies over Symbolic World Models for Long-Horizon Planningcited by 0
- 2026Planning with Transformers: Chain of Computation and Structured Context Windowscited by 0
- 2026The Rise of Verbal Reinforcement Learningcited by 0
- 2026The Rise of Verbal Reinforcement Learning1 Sep 2026
- 2026Planning with Transformers: Chain of Computation and Structured Context Windows20 Jul 2026
- 2026Learning Bilevel Policies over Symbolic World Models for Long-Horizon Planning15 May 2026
- 2026PlatoLTL: Scaling LTL-Guided Multi-Task RL30 Jan 2026
- 2025Beyond Fixed Tasks: Unsupervised Environment Design for Task-Level Pairs16 Nov 2025
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Reward-Zero: Language Embedding Driven Implicit Reward Mechanisms for Reinforcement Learning
- 2023Shattering the Agent-Environment Interface for Fine-Tuning Inclusive Language Models
- 2025CuES: A Curiosity-driven and Environment-grounded Synthesis Framework for Agentic RL
- 2026Hierarchical Reward Design from Language: Enhancing Alignment of Agent Behavior with Human Specifications
- 2026The End of Reward Engineering: How LLMs Are Redefining Multi-Agent Coordination
- 2023Towards A Unified Agent with Foundation Models
- 2025PARL: Prompt-based Agents for Reinforcement Learning
- 2024Words as Beacons: Guiding RL Agents with High-Level Language Prompts