Learning Robust Reward Machines from Noisy Labels
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
This paper presents PROB-IRM, an approach that learns robust reward machines (RMs) for reinforcement learning (RL) agents from noisy execution traces. The key aspect of RM-driven RL is the exploitation of a finite-state machine that decomposes the agent's task into different subtasks. PROB-IRM uses a state-of-the-art inductive logic programming framework robust to noisy examples to learn RMs from noisy traces using the Bayesian posterior degree of beliefs, thus ensuring robustness against inconsistencies. Pivotal for the results is the interleaving between RM learning and policy learning: a new RM is learned whenever the RL agent generates a trace that is believed not to be accepted by the current RM. To speed up the training of the RL agent, PROB-IRM employs a probabilistic formulation of reward shaping that uses the posterior Bayesian beliefs derived from the traces. Our experimental analysis shows that PROB-IRM can learn (potentially imperfect) RMs from noisy traces and exploit them to train an RL agent to solve its tasks successfully. Despite the complexity of learning the RM from noisy traces, agents trained with PROB-IRM perform comparably to agents provided with handcrafted RMs.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Aug 2024.
Builds on
12 of 33 references.
References · 12
- 2017Robust Adversarial Reinforcement Learningcited by 439
- 2020Reward Machines: Exploiting Reward Function Structure in Reinforcement Learningcited by 183
- 2019Joint Inference of Reward Machines and Policies for Reinforcement Learningcited by 56
- 2014Probably Approximately Correct MDP Learning and Control With Temporal Logic Constraintscited by 53
- 2020Induction and Exploitation of Subgoal Automata for Reinforcement Learningcited by 26
- 2018Inductive Learning of Answer Set Programs from Noisy Examplescited by 21
- 2019Induction of Subgoal Automata for Reinforcement Learningcited by 17
- 2021Learning Reward Machines: A Study in Partially Observable Reinforcement Learningcited by 16
- 2021FF-NSL: Feed-Forward Neural-Symbolic Learnercited by 15
- 2022Joint Learning of Reward Machines and Policies in Environments with Partially Known Semanticscited by 12
- 2024Reward Machines for Deep RL in Noisy and Uncertain Environmentscited by 11
- 2022Noisy Symbolic Abstractions for Deep RL: A case study with Reward Machinescited by 10
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 4; 2026: 2.
7 papers.
- 2025Ground-Compose-Reinforce: Grounding Language in Agentic Behaviours using Limited Datacited by 5
- 2024FORM: Learning Expressive and Transferable First-Order Logic Reward Machinescited by 4
- 2025Learning Reward Machines from Partially Observed Policiescited by 3
- 2025DVPO: Distributional Value Modeling-based Policy Optimization for LLM Post-Trainingcited by 1
- 2025Expressive Temporal Specifications for Reward Monitoringcited by 0
- 2026DFPO: Scaling Value Modeling via Distributional Flow towards Robust and Generalizable LLM Post-Trainingcited by 0
- 2026Active Reward Machine Inference From Raw State Trajectoriescited by 0
- 2026Active Reward Machine Inference From Raw State Trajectories8 Apr 2026
- 2026DFPO: Scaling Value Modeling via Distributional Flow towards Robust and Generalizable LLM Post-Training5 Feb 2026
- 2025DVPO: Distributional Value Modeling-based Policy Optimization for LLM Post-Training3 Dec 2025
- 2025Expressive Temporal Specifications for Reward Monitoring16 Nov 2025
- 2025Ground-Compose-Reinforce: Grounding Language in Agentic Behaviours using Limited Data14 Jul 2025
- 2025Learning Reward Machines from Partially Observed Policies6 Feb 2025
- 2024FORM: Learning Expressive and Transferable First-Order Logic Reward Machines31 Dec 2024