mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Bridging the Performance Gap Between Target-Free and Target-Based Reinforcement Learning

arXiv 2506.04398 ↗First posted 4 Jun 2025cs.LG cs.AIcited by 4

On the map: Deep reinforcement learning methods → Deep RL algorithms and representations

Abstract (arXiv)

The use of target networks in deep reinforcement learning is a widely popular solution to mitigate the brittleness of semi-gradient approaches and stabilize learning. However, target networks notoriously require additional memory and delay the propagation of Bellman updates compared to an ideal target-free approach. In this work, we step out of the binary choice between target-free and target-based algorithms. We introduce a new method that uses a copy of the last linear layer of the online network as a target network, while sharing the remaining parameters with the up-to-date online network. This simple modification enables us to keep the target-free's low-memory footprint while leveraging the target-based literature. We find that combining our approach with the concept of iterated Q-learning, which consists of learning consecutive Bellman updates in parallel, helps improve the sample-efficiency of target-free approaches. Our proposed method, iterated Shared Q-Learning (iS-QL), bridges the performance gap between target-free and target-based approaches across various problems while using a single Q-network, thus stepping towards resource-efficient reinforcement learning algorithms.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Deep RL algorithms and representations, one of 15 directions in Deep reinforcement learning methods. Builds on 45 of its 68 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Jun 2025.

Builds on

45 of 68 references.

Closest ancestors · 8

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025Eau De Q-Network: Adaptive Distillation of Neural Networks in Deep Reinforcement Learning3 Mar
  2. 2025Hyperspherical Normalization for Scalable Deep Reinforcement Learning21 Feb
  3. 2025Scaling Off-Policy Reinforcement Learning with Batch and Weight Normalization11 Feb
  4. 2024Streaming Deep Reinforcement Learning Finally Works18 Oct
  5. 2024Simplifying Deep Temporal Difference Learning5 Jul
  6. 2024Bigger, Regularized, Optimistic: scaling for compute and sample-efficient continuous control25 May
  7. 2024Iterated Q-Network: Beyond One-Step Bellman Updates in Deep Reinforcement Learning4 Mar
  8. 2024Mixtures of Experts Unlock Parameter Scaling for Deep RL13 Feb

Other references · 37

  1. 2015Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shiftcited by 7,005
  2. 2016Layer Normalizationcited by 5,669
  3. 2018Soft Actor-Critic: Off-Policy Maximum Entropy Deep Reinforcement Learning with a Stochastic Actorcited by 4,885
  4. 2020Conservative Q-Learning for Offline Reinforcement Learningcited by 1,809
  5. 2019Mastering Atari, Go, Chess and Shogi by Planning with a Learned Modelcited by 1,353
  6. 2021Offline Reinforcement Learning with Implicit Q-Learningcited by 1,293
  7. 2017Mixed Precision Trainingcited by 1,156
  8. 2018DeepMind Control Suitecited by 956
  9. 2018IMPALA: Scalable Distributed Deep-RL with Importance Weighted Actor-Learner Architecturescited by 883
  10. 2021Deep Reinforcement Learning at the Edge of the Statistical Precipicecited by 807
  11. 2016Deep Exploration via Bootstrapped DQNcited by 527
  12. 2019Quantifying the Carbon Emissions of Machine Learningcited by 521
25 more
  1. 2017Revisiting the Arcade Learning Environment: Evaluation Protocols and Open Problems for General Agentscited by 269
  2. 2018Deep Reinforcement Learning and the Deadly Triadcited by 174
  3. 2018Meta-Gradient Reinforcement Learningcited by 159
  4. 2023Bigger, Better, Faster: Human-level Atari with human-level efficiencycited by 147
  5. 2022Offline RL for Natural Language Generation with Implicit Language Q Learningcited by 138
  6. 2020Implicit Under-Parameterization Inhibits Data-Efficient Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 134
  7. 2018Dopamine: A Research Framework for Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 122
  8. 2019CrossQ: Batch Normalization in Deep Reinforcement Learning for Greater Sample Efficiency and Simplicitycited by 95
  9. 2022The State of Sparse Training in Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 61
  10. 2021The Difficulty of Passive Learning in Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 50
  11. 2023Multi-Task Reinforcement Learning with Mixture of Orthogonal Expertscited by 49
  12. 2021Breaking the Deadly Triad with a Target Networkcited by 47
  13. 2022The Phenomenon of Policy Churncited by 28
  14. 2021A Generalized Projected Bellman Error for Off-policy Value Estimation in Reinforcement Learningcited by 26
  15. 2020GRAC: Self-Guided and Self-Regularized Actor-Criticcited by 21
  16. 2024Deep Policy Gradient Methods Without Batch Updates, Target Networks, or Replay Bufferscited by 18
  17. 2021Functional Regularization for Reinforcement Learning via Learned Fourier Featurescited by 17
  18. 2020A Deep Reinforcement Learning Framework for Continuous Intraday Market Biddingcited by 15
  19. 2021Bridging the Gap Between Target Networks and Functional Regularizationcited by 7
  20. 2019Continuous Control for High-Dimensional State Spaces: An Interactive Learning Approachcited by 6
  21. 2020Stabilizing Q Learning Via Soft Mellowmax Operatorcited by 6
  22. 2025Optimistic critics can empower small actorscited by 4
  23. 2021Honey, I Shrunk The Actor: A Case Study on Preserving Performance with Smaller Actors in Actor-Critic RLcited by 3
  24. 2022Chaining Value Functions for Off-Policy Learningcited by 3
  25. 2023Parameterized Projected Bellman Operatorcited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 3.

4 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Deep Q-Learning with Gradient Target Tracking
  2. 2026The Role of Target Update Frequencies in Q-Learning
  3. 2024Learning the Target Network in Function Space
  4. 2026Target-Aligned Bellman Backup for Cross-domain Offline Reinforcement Learning
  5. 2026Geometrically Averaged Hard Target Updates for Linear Q-Learning
  6. 2026From Weak Data to Strong Policy: Q-Targets Enable Provable In-Context Reinforcement Learning
  7. 2025Towards General-Purpose Model-Free Reinforcement Learning
  8. 2026Target Updates May Stabilize Linear Q-Learning: Periodic and Soft Dynamics